Torch2.0 scaled_dot_product_attention processor (#2303)

* add sdpa processor

* don't use it by default

* add some checks and style

* typo

* support torch sdpa in dreambooth example

* use torch attn proc by default when available

* typo

* add attn mask

* fix naming

* being doc

* doc

* Apply suggestions from code review

* polish

* torctree

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Sayak Paul <spsayakpaul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Patrick von Platen <patrick.v.platen@gmail.com>

* better name

* style

* add benchamrk table

* Update docs/source/en/optimization/torch2.0.mdx

* up

* fix example

* check if processor is None

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <pedro@huggingface.co>

* add fp32 benchmakr

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Sayak Paul <spsayakpaul@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Sayak Paul <spsayakpaul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Patrick von Platen <patrick.v.platen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <pedro@huggingface.co>
This commit is contained in:
Suraj Patil 2023-02-17 14:22:26 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent c5fa13aa0d
commit 0c0bb085e1
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 250 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
- sections:
- local: optimization/fp16
title: Memory and Speed
- local: optimization/torch2.0
title: Torch2.0 support
- local: optimization/xformers
title: xFormers
- local: optimization/onnx

View File

@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
<!--Copyright 2023 The HuggingFace Team. All rights reserved.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on
an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.
-->
# Torch2.0 support in Diffusers
Starting from version `0.13.0`, Diffusers supports the latest optimization from the upcoming [PyTorch 2.0](https://pytorch.org/get-started/pytorch-2.0/) release. These include:
1. Support for native flash and memory-efficient attention without any extra dependencies.
2. [`torch.compile`](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/torch_compile_tutorial.html) support for compiling individual models for extra performance boost.
## Installation
To benefit from the native efficient attention and `torch.compile`, we will need to install the nightly version of PyTorch as the stable version is yet to be released. The first step is to install CUDA11.7 or CUDA11.8,
as torch2.0 does not support the previous versions. Once CUDA is installed, torch nightly can be installed using:
```bash
pip install --pre torch torchvision --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/nightly/cu117
```
## Using efficient attention and torch.compile.
1. **Efficient Attention**
Efficient attention is implemented via the [`torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention`](https://pytorch.org/docs/master/generated/torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention) function, which automatically enables flash/memory efficient attention, depending on the input and the GPU type. This is the same as the `memory_efficient_attention` from [xFormers](https://github.com/facebookresearch/xformers) but built natively into PyTorch.
Efficient attention will be enabled by default in Diffusers if torch2.0 is installed and if `torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention` is available. To use it, you can install torch2.0 as suggested above and use the pipeline. For example:
```Python
import torch
from diffusers import StableDiffusionPipeline
pipe = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5", torch_dtype=torch.float16)
pipe = pipe.to("cuda")
prompt = "a photo of an astronaut riding a horse on mars"
image = pipe(prompt).images[0]
```
If you want to enable it explicitly (which is not required), you can do so as shown below.
```Python
import torch
from diffusers import StableDiffusionPipeline
from diffusers.models.cross_attention import AttnProccesor2_0
pipe = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5", torch_dtype=torch.float16).to("cuda")
pipe.unet.set_attn_processor(AttnProccesor2_0())
prompt = "a photo of an astronaut riding a horse on mars"
image = pipe(prompt).images[0]
```
This should be as fast and memory efficient as `xFormers`.
2. **torch.compile**
To get an additional speedup, we can use the new `torch.compile` feature. To do so, we wrap our `unet` with `torch.compile`. For more information and different options, refer to the
[torch compile docs](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/intermediate/torch_compile_tutorial.html).
```python
import torch
from diffusers import StableDiffusionPipeline
pipe = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5", torch_dtype=torch.float16).to(
"cuda"
)
pipe.unet = torch.compile(pipe.unet)
batch_size = 10
prompt = "A photo of an astronaut riding a horse on marse."
images = pipe(prompt, num_inference_steps=steps, num_images_per_prompt=batch_size).images
```
Depending on the type of GPU it can give between 2-9% speed-up over efficient attention. But note that as of now the speed-up is mostly noticeable on the more recent GPU architectures, such as in the A100.
Note that compilation will also take some time to complete, so it is best suited for situations where you need to prepare your pipeline once and then perform the same type of inference operations multiple times.
## Benchmark
We conducted a simple benchmark on different GPUs to compare vanilla attention, xFormers, `torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention` and `torch.compile+torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention`.
For the benchmark we used the the [stable-diffusion-v1-4](https://huggingface.co/CompVis/stable-diffusion-v1-4) model with 50 steps. `xFormers` benchmark is done using the `torch==1.13.1` version. The table below summarizes the result that we got.
The `Speed over xformers` columns denotes the speed-up gained over `xFormers` using the `torch.compile+torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention`.
### FP16 benchmark
The table below shows the benchmark results for inference using `fp16`. As we can see, `torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention` is as fast as `xFormers` (sometimes slightly faster/slower) on all the GPUs we tested.
And using `torch.compile` gives further speed-up up to 10% over `xFormers`, but it's mostly noticeable on the A100 GPU.
___The time reported is in seconds.___
| GPU | Batch Size | Vanilla Attention | xFormers | PyTorch2.0 SDPA | SDPA + torch.compile | Speed over xformers (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A100 | 10 | 12.02 | 8.7 | 8.79 | 7.89 | 9.31 |
| A100 | 16 | 18.95 | 13.57 | 13.67 | 12.25 | 9.73 |
| A100 | 32 (1) | OOM | 26.56 | 26.68 | 24.08 | 9.34 |
| A100 | 64(2) | | 52.51 | 53.03 | 47.81 | 8.95 |
| | | | | | | |
| T4 | 4 | 38.81 | 30.09 | 29.74 | 27.55 | 8.44 |
| T4 | 8 | OOM | 55.71 | 55.99 | 53.85 | 3.34 |
| T4 | 10 | OOM | 68.96 | 69.86 | 65.35 | 5.23 |
| T4 | 16 | OOM | 111.47 | 113.26 | 106.93 | 4.07 |
| | | | | | | |
| V100 | 4 | 9.84 | 8.16 | 8.09 | 7.65 | 6.25 |
| V100 | 8 | OOM | 15.62 | 15.44 | 14.59 | 6.59 |
| V100 | 10 | OOM | 19.52 | 19.28 | 18.18 | 6.86 |
| V100 | 16 | OOM | 30.29 | 29.84 | 28.22 | 6.83 |
| | | | | | | |
| A10 | 4 | 13.94 | 9.81 | 10.01 | 9.35 | 4.69 |
| A10 | 8 | 27.09 | 19 | 19.53 | 18.33 | 3.53 |
| A10 | 10 | 33.69 | 23.53 | 24.19 | 22.52 | 4.29 |
| A10 | 16 | OOM | 37.55 | 38.31 | 36.81 | 1.97 |
| A10 | 32 (1) | | 77.19 | 78.43 | 76.64 | 0.71 |
| A10 | 64 (1) | | 173.59 | 158.99 | 155.14 | 10.63 |
| | | | | | | |
| 3090 | 4 | 10.04 | 7.82 | 7.89 | 7.47 | 4.48 |
| 3090 | 8 | 19.27 | 14.97 | 15.04 | 14.22 | 5.01 |
| 3090 | 10| 24.08 | 18.7 | 18.7 | 17.69 | 5.40 |
| 3090 | 16 | OOM | 29.06 | 29.06 | 28.2 | 2.96 |
| 3090 | 32 (1) | | 58.05 | 58 | 54.88 | 5.46 |
| 3090 | 64 (1) | | 126.54 | 126.03 | 117.33 | 7.28 |
| | | | | | | |
| 3090 Ti | 4 | 9.07 | 7.14 | 7.15 | 6.81 | 4.62 |
| 3090 Ti | 8 | 17.51 | 13.65 | 13.72 | 12.99 | 4.84 |
| 3090 Ti | 10 (2) | 21.79 | 16.85 | 16.93 | 16.02 | 4.93 |
| 3090 Ti | 16 | OOM | 26.1 | 26.28 | 25.46 | 2.45 |
| 3090 Ti | 32 (1) | | 51.78 | 52.04 | 49.15 | 5.08 |
| 3090 Ti | 64 (1) | | 112.02 | 112.33 | 103.91 | 7.24 |
### FP32 benchmark
The table below shows the benchmark results for inference using `fp32`. As we can see, `torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention` is as fast as `xFormers` (sometimes slightly faster/slower) on all the GPUs we tested.
Using `torch.compile` with efficient attention gives up to 18% performance improvement over `xFormers` in Ampere cards, and up to 20% over vanilla attention.
| GPU | Batch Size | Vanilla Attention | xFormers | PyTorch2.0 SDPA | SDPA + torch.compile | Speed over xformers (%) | Speed over vanilla (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A100 | 4 | 16.56 | 12.42 | 12.2 | 11.84 | 4.67 | 28.50 |
| A100 | 10 | OOM | 29.93 | 29.44 | 28.5 | 4.78 | |
| A100 | 16 | | 47.08 | 46.27 | 44.8 | 4.84 | |
| A100 | 32 | | 92.89 | 91.34 | 88.35 | 4.89 | |
| A100 | 64 | | 185.3 | 182.71 | 176.48 | 4.76 | |
| | | | | | | |
| T4 | 1 | 28.2 | 24.49 | 23.93 | 23.56 | 3.80 | 16.45 |
| T4 | 2 | 52.77 | 45.7 | 45.88 | 45.06 | 1.40 | 14.61 |
| T4 | 4 | OOM | 85.72 | 85.78 | 84.48 | 1.45 | |
| T4 | 8 | | 149.64 | 150.75 | 148.4 | 0.83 | |
| | | | | | | |
| V100 | 1 | 7.4 | 6.84 | 6.8 | 6.66 | 2.63 | 10.00 |
| V100 | 2 | 13.85 | 12.81 | 12.66 | 12.35 | 3.59 | 10.83 |
| V100 | 4 | OOM | 25.73 | 25.31 | 24.78 | 3.69 | |
| V100 | 8 | | 43.95 | 43.37 | 42.25 | 3.87 | |
| V100 | 16 | | 84.99 | 84.73 | 82.55 | 2.87 | |
| | | | | | | |
| 3090 | 1 | 7.09 | 6.78 | 6.11 | 6.03 | 11.06 | 14.95 |
| 3090 | 4 | 22.69 | 21.45 | 18.67 | 18.09 | 15.66 | 20.27 |
| 3090 | 8 (2) | | 42.59 | 36.75 | 35.59 | 16.44 | |
| 3090 | 16 | | 85.35 | 72.37 | 70.25 | 17.69 | |
| 3090 | 32 (1) | | 162.05 | 138.99 | 134.53 | 16.98 | |
| 3090 | 48 | | 241.91 | 207.75 | | 14.12 | |
| | | | | | | |
| 3090 Ti | 1 | 6.45 | 6.19 | 5.64 | 5.49 | 11.31 | 14.88 |
| 3090 Ti | 4 | 20.32 | 19.31 | 16.9 | 16.37 | 15.23 | 19.44 |
| 3090 Ti | 8 (2) | | 37.93 | 33.05 | 31.99 | 15.66 | |
| 3090 Ti | 16 | | 75.37 | 65.25 | 64.32 | 14.66 | |
| 3090 Ti | 32 (1) | | 142.55 | 124.44 | 120.74 | 15.30 | |
| 3090 Ti | 48 | | 213.19 | 186.55 | | 12.50 | |
| | | | | | | |
| 4090 | 1 | 5.54 | 4.99 | | | | |
| 4090 | 4 | 13.67 | 11.4 | | | | |
| 4090 | 8 (2) | | 19.79 | | | | |
| 4090 | 16 | | 38.62 | | | | |
| 4090 | 32 (1) | | 76.57 | | | | |
| 4090 | 48 | | 114.44 | | | 13.68 | |
| | | | | | | |
| A10 | 1 | 10.59 | 8.81 | 7.51 | 7.35 | 16.57 | 30.59 |
| A10 | 4 | 34.77 | 27.63 | 22.77 | 22.07 | 20.12 | 36.53 |
| A10 | 8 | | 56.19 | 43.53 | 43.86 | 21.94 | |
| A10 | 16 | | 116.49 | 88.56 | 86.64 | 25.62 | |
| A10 | 32 | | 221.95 | 175.74 | 168.18 | 24.23 | |
| A10 | 48 | | 333.23 | 264.84 | | 20.52 | |
| | | | | | | |
(1) Batch Size >= 32 requires enable_vae_slicing() because of https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/81665
This is required for PyTorch 1.13.1, and also for PyTorch 2.0 and batch size of 64
For more details about how this benchmark was run, please refer to [this PR](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/2303).

View File

@ -99,7 +99,10 @@ class CrossAttention(nn.Module):
self.to_out.append(nn.Dropout(dropout))
# set attention processor
processor = processor if processor is not None else CrossAttnProcessor()
# We use the AttnProccesor2_0 by default when torch2.x is used which uses
# torch.nn.functional.scaled_dot_product_attention for native Flash/memory_efficient_attention
if processor is None:
processor = AttnProccesor2_0() if hasattr(F, "scaled_dot_product_attention") else CrossAttnProcessor()
self.set_processor(processor)
def set_use_memory_efficient_attention_xformers(
@ -463,6 +466,50 @@ class XFormersCrossAttnProcessor:
return hidden_states
class AttnProccesor2_0:
def __init__(self):
if not hasattr(F, "scaled_dot_product_attention"):
raise ImportError("AttnProccesor2_0 requires PyTorch 2.0, to use it, please upgrade PyTorch to 2.0.")
def __call__(self, attn: CrossAttention, hidden_states, encoder_hidden_states=None, attention_mask=None):
batch_size, sequence_length, inner_dim = hidden_states.shape
if attention_mask is not None:
attention_mask = attn.prepare_attention_mask(attention_mask, sequence_length, batch_size)
# scaled_dot_product_attention expects attention_mask shape to be
# (batch, heads, source_length, target_length)
attention_mask = attention_mask.view(batch_size, attn.heads, -1, attention_mask.shape[-1])
query = attn.to_q(hidden_states)
if encoder_hidden_states is None:
encoder_hidden_states = hidden_states
elif attn.cross_attention_norm:
encoder_hidden_states = attn.norm_cross(encoder_hidden_states)
key = attn.to_k(encoder_hidden_states)
value = attn.to_v(encoder_hidden_states)
head_dim = inner_dim // attn.heads
query = query.view(batch_size, -1, attn.heads, head_dim).transpose(1, 2)
key = key.view(batch_size, -1, attn.heads, head_dim).transpose(1, 2)
value = value.view(batch_size, -1, attn.heads, head_dim).transpose(1, 2)
# the output of sdp = (batch, num_heads, seq_len, head_dim)
hidden_states = F.scaled_dot_product_attention(
query, key, value, attn_mask=attention_mask, dropout_p=0.0, is_causal=False
)
hidden_states = hidden_states.transpose(1, 2).reshape(batch_size, -1, attn.heads * head_dim)
hidden_states = hidden_states.to(query.dtype)
# linear proj
hidden_states = attn.to_out[0](hidden_states)
# dropout
hidden_states = attn.to_out[1](hidden_states)
return hidden_states
class LoRAXFormersCrossAttnProcessor(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, hidden_size, cross_attention_dim, rank=4, attention_op: Optional[Callable] = None):
super().__init__()