gitea/tests/integration/api_pull_test.go

353 lines
15 KiB
Go
Raw Permalink Normal View History

2017-06-30 10:50:57 -06:00
// Copyright 2017 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
2017-06-30 10:50:57 -06:00
package integration
2017-06-30 10:50:57 -06:00
import (
"fmt"
"io"
2017-06-30 10:50:57 -06:00
"net/http"
"testing"
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/forms"
issue_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/issue"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
2017-06-30 10:50:57 -06:00
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func TestAPIViewPulls(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
2017-06-30 10:50:57 -06:00
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 12:57:16 -06:00
ctx := NewAPITestContext(t, "user2", repo.Name, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadRepository)
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls?state=all", owner.Name, repo.Name).
AddTokenAuth(ctx.Token)
resp := ctx.Session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
2017-06-30 10:50:57 -06:00
var pulls []*api.PullRequest
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &pulls)
expectedLen := unittest.GetCount(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: repo.ID}, unittest.Cond("is_pull = ?", true))
2017-06-30 10:50:57 -06:00
assert.Len(t, pulls, expectedLen)
pull := pulls[0]
if assert.EqualValues(t, 5, pull.ID) {
resp = ctx.Session.MakeRequest(t, NewRequest(t, "GET", pull.DiffURL), http.StatusOK)
_, err := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
assert.NoError(t, err)
// TODO: use diff to generate stats to test against
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("APIGetPullFiles_%d", pull.ID),
doAPIGetPullFiles(ctx, pull, func(t *testing.T, files []*api.ChangedFile) {
if assert.Len(t, files, 1) {
assert.Equal(t, "File-WoW", files[0].Filename)
assert.Empty(t, files[0].PreviousFilename)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, files[0].Additions)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, files[0].Changes)
assert.EqualValues(t, 0, files[0].Deletions)
assert.Equal(t, "added", files[0].Status)
}
}))
}
2017-06-30 10:50:57 -06:00
}
func TestAPIViewPullsByBaseHead(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
ctx := NewAPITestContext(t, "user2", repo.Name, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadRepository)
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/master/branch2", owner.Name, repo.Name).
AddTokenAuth(ctx.Token)
resp := ctx.Session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
pull := &api.PullRequest{}
DecodeJSON(t, resp, pull)
assert.EqualValues(t, 3, pull.Index)
assert.EqualValues(t, 2, pull.ID)
req = NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/master/branch-not-exist", owner.Name, repo.Name).
AddTokenAuth(ctx.Token)
ctx.Session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
}
// TestAPIMergePullWIP ensures that we can't merge a WIP pull request
func TestAPIMergePullWIP(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
pr := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{Status: issues_model.PullRequestStatusMergeable}, unittest.Cond("has_merged = ?", false))
pr.LoadIssue(db.DefaultContext)
issue_service.ChangeTitle(db.DefaultContext, pr.Issue, owner, setting.Repository.PullRequest.WorkInProgressPrefixes[0]+" "+pr.Issue.Title)
// force reload
pr.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext)
assert.Contains(t, pr.Issue.Title, setting.Repository.PullRequest.WorkInProgressPrefixes[0])
session := loginUser(t, owner.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 12:57:16 -06:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/merge", owner.Name, repo.Name, pr.Index), &forms.MergePullRequestForm{
MergeMessageField: pr.Issue.Title,
Do: string(repo_model.MergeStyleMerge),
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusMethodNotAllowed)
}
func TestAPICreatePullSuccess(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 10})
// repo10 have code, pulls units.
repo11 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 11})
// repo11 only have code unit but should still create pulls
owner10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo10.OwnerID})
owner11 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo11.OwnerID})
session := loginUser(t, owner11.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 12:57:16 -06:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner10.Name, repo10.Name), &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
Head: fmt.Sprintf("%s:master", owner11.Name),
Base: "master",
Title: "create a failure pr",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity) // second request should fail
}
func TestAPICreatePullBasePermission(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 10})
// repo10 have code, pulls units.
repo11 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 11})
// repo11 only have code unit but should still create pulls
owner10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo10.OwnerID})
user4 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 4})
session := loginUser(t, user4.Name)
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
opts := &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
Head: fmt.Sprintf("%s:master", repo11.OwnerName),
Base: "master",
Title: "create a failure pr",
}
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner10.Name, repo10.Name), &opts).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// add user4 to be a collaborator to base repo
ctx := NewAPITestContext(t, repo10.OwnerName, repo10.Name, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
t.Run("AddUser4AsCollaborator", doAPIAddCollaborator(ctx, user4.Name, perm.AccessModeRead))
// create again
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner10.Name, repo10.Name), &opts).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
}
func TestAPICreatePullHeadPermission(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 10})
// repo10 have code, pulls units.
repo11 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 11})
// repo11 only have code unit but should still create pulls
owner10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo10.OwnerID})
user4 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 4})
session := loginUser(t, user4.Name)
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
opts := &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
Head: fmt.Sprintf("%s:master", repo11.OwnerName),
Base: "master",
Title: "create a failure pr",
}
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner10.Name, repo10.Name), &opts).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// add user4 to be a collaborator to head repo with read permission
ctx := NewAPITestContext(t, repo11.OwnerName, repo11.Name, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
t.Run("AddUser4AsCollaboratorWithRead", doAPIAddCollaborator(ctx, user4.Name, perm.AccessModeRead))
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner10.Name, repo10.Name), &opts).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// add user4 to be a collaborator to head repo with write permission
t.Run("AddUser4AsCollaboratorWithWrite", doAPIAddCollaborator(ctx, user4.Name, perm.AccessModeWrite))
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner10.Name, repo10.Name), &opts).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
}
func TestAPICreatePullSameRepoSuccess(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
session := loginUser(t, owner.Name)
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner.Name, repo.Name), &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
Head: fmt.Sprintf("%s:pr-to-update", owner.Name),
Base: "master",
Title: "successfully create a PR between branches of the same repository",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity) // second request should fail
}
func TestAPICreatePullWithFieldsSuccess(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
// repo10 have code, pulls units.
repo10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 10})
owner10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo10.OwnerID})
// repo11 only have code unit but should still create pulls
repo11 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 11})
owner11 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo11.OwnerID})
session := loginUser(t, owner11.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 12:57:16 -06:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
opts := &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
Head: fmt.Sprintf("%s:master", owner11.Name),
Base: "master",
Title: "create a failure pr",
Body: "foobaaar",
Milestone: 5,
Assignees: []string{owner10.Name},
Labels: []int64{5},
}
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner10.Name, repo10.Name), opts).
AddTokenAuth(token)
res := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
pull := new(api.PullRequest)
DecodeJSON(t, res, pull)
assert.NotNil(t, pull.Milestone)
assert.EqualValues(t, opts.Milestone, pull.Milestone.ID)
if assert.Len(t, pull.Assignees, 1) {
assert.EqualValues(t, opts.Assignees[0], owner10.Name)
}
assert.NotNil(t, pull.Labels)
assert.EqualValues(t, opts.Labels[0], pull.Labels[0].ID)
}
func TestAPICreatePullWithFieldsFailure(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
// repo10 have code, pulls units.
repo10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 10})
owner10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo10.OwnerID})
// repo11 only have code unit but should still create pulls
repo11 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 11})
owner11 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo11.OwnerID})
session := loginUser(t, owner11.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 12:57:16 -06:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
opts := &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
Head: fmt.Sprintf("%s:master", owner11.Name),
Base: "master",
}
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner10.Name, repo10.Name), opts).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
opts.Title = "is required"
opts.Milestone = 666
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
opts.Milestone = 5
opts.Assignees = []string{"qweruqweroiuyqweoiruywqer"}
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
opts.Assignees = []string{owner10.LoginName}
opts.Labels = []int64{55555}
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
opts.Labels = []int64{5}
}
func TestAPIEditPull(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 10})
owner10 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo10.OwnerID})
session := loginUser(t, owner10.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 12:57:16 -06:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
title := "create a success pr"
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls", owner10.Name, repo10.Name), &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
Head: "develop",
Base: "master",
Title: title,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
apiPull := new(api.PullRequest)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, apiPull)
assert.EqualValues(t, "master", apiPull.Base.Name)
newTitle := "edit a this pr"
newBody := "edited body"
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPatch, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d", owner10.Name, repo10.Name, apiPull.Index), &api.EditPullRequestOption{
Base: "feature/1",
Title: newTitle,
Body: &newBody,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, apiPull)
assert.EqualValues(t, "feature/1", apiPull.Base.Name)
// check comment history
pull := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: apiPull.ID})
err := pull.LoadIssue(db.DefaultContext)
assert.NoError(t, err)
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Comment{IssueID: pull.Issue.ID, OldTitle: title, NewTitle: newTitle})
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.ContentHistory{IssueID: pull.Issue.ID, ContentText: newBody, IsFirstCreated: false})
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPatch, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d", owner10.Name, repo10.Name, pull.Index), &api.EditPullRequestOption{
Base: "not-exist",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
}
func doAPIGetPullFiles(ctx APITestContext, pr *api.PullRequest, callback func(*testing.T, []*api.ChangedFile)) func(*testing.T) {
return func(t *testing.T) {
req := NewRequest(t, http.MethodGet, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/files", ctx.Username, ctx.Reponame, pr.Index)).
AddTokenAuth(ctx.Token)
if ctx.ExpectedCode == 0 {
ctx.ExpectedCode = http.StatusOK
}
resp := ctx.Session.MakeRequest(t, req, ctx.ExpectedCode)
files := make([]*api.ChangedFile, 0, 1)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &files)
if callback != nil {
callback(t, files)
}
}
}
func TestAPICommitPullRequest(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
ctx := NewAPITestContext(t, "user2", repo.Name, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadRepository)
mergedCommitSHA := "1a8823cd1a9549fde083f992f6b9b87a7ab74fb3"
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/commits/%s/pull", owner.Name, repo.Name, mergedCommitSHA).AddTokenAuth(ctx.Token)
ctx.Session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
invalidCommitSHA := "abcd1234abcd1234abcd1234abcd1234abcd1234"
req = NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/commits/%s/pull", owner.Name, repo.Name, invalidCommitSHA).AddTokenAuth(ctx.Token)
ctx.Session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
}