Commit Graph

83 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
charles-plutohealth 7c6edf1ba0
Fix `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/files` endpoint not populating `previous_filename` (#32017)
---
`status == "rename"` should have read `status == "renamed"`. The typo
means that file.PreviousFilename would never be populated, which e.g.
breaks usage of the Github Action at
https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter.
2024-09-12 01:29:27 +08:00
Zettat123 def1c9670b
Support migration from AWS CodeCommit (#31981)
This PR adds support for migrating repos from [AWS
CodeCommit](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/welcome.html).

The access key ID and secret access key are required to get repository
information and pull requests. And [HTTPS Git
credentials](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/setting-up-gc.html)
are required to clone the repository.

<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82ecb2d0-8d43-42b0-b5af-f5347a13b9d0"
width="680" />

The AWS CodeCommit icon is from [AWS Architecture
Icons](https://aws.amazon.com/architecture/icons/).

<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c44d21f-d753-40f5-9eae-5d3589e0d50d"
width="320" />
2024-09-11 07:49:42 +08:00
Edip Emre Bodur 94cca8846e
Fix null requested_reviewer from API (#31773)
If the assign the pull request review to a team, it did not show the
members of the team in the "requested_reviewers" field, so the field was
null. As a solution, I added the team members to the array.

fix #31764
2024-08-05 10:59:53 +00:00
Denys Konovalov a8d0c879c3
add skip secondary authorization option for public oauth2 clients (#31454) 2024-07-19 14:28:30 -04:00
wxiaoguang 72b6bc8caf
Refactor webhook (#31587)
A more complete fix for #31588

1. Make "generic" code more readable
2. Clarify HTML or Markdown for the payload content
2024-07-10 11:37:16 +00:00
Henry Goodman 12cb1d2998
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086)
Fixes #22722 

### Problem
Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).

The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.

### Solution
Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.

It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.

This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)

This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`

### Updated Branch Protection UI:

<img width="943" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">

### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source
branch `test` being a protected branch:


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc)
<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-07-05 18:21:56 +00:00
mzroot d4e4226c3c
Add tag protection via rest api #17862 (#31295)
Add tag protection manage via rest API.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alexander Kogay <kogay.a@citilink.ru>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-06-14 18:56:10 +02:00
Lunny Xiao 352a2cae24
Performance improvements for pull request list API (#30490)
Fix #30483

---------

Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-05-31 12:10:11 +00:00
Lunny Xiao de4616690f
Add topics for repository API (#31127)
Fix ##31100
2024-05-28 10:03:54 +00:00
Lunny Xiao cd7d1314fc
Fix API repository object format missed (#31118)
Fix #31117
2024-05-28 02:43:13 +00:00
André Rosenhammer 14f6105ce0
Make gitea webhooks openproject compatible (#28435)
This PR adds some fields to the gitea webhook payload that
[openproject](https://www.openproject.org/) expects to exists in order
to process the webhooks.
These fields do exists in Github's webhook payload so adding them makes
Gitea's native webhook more compatible towards Github's.
2024-05-26 04:08:13 +00:00
Chester 6709e28da7
Add API endpoints for getting action jobs status (#26673)
Sample of response, it is similar to Github actions

ref
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/workflow-runs?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository

``` json
{
    "workflow_runs": [
        {
            "id": 3,
            "name": "Explore-Gitea-Actions",
            "head_branch": "main",
            "head_sha": "6d8d29a9f7a01ded8f8aeb64341cb31ee1ab5f19",
            "run_number": 3,
            "event": "push",
            "display_title": "More job",
            "status": "success",
            "workflow_id": "demo2.yaml",
            "url": "/chester/test/actions/runs/3",
            "created_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:33-04:00",
            "updated_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:37-04:00",
            "run_started_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:33-04:00"
        },
        {
            "id": 2,
            "name": "Explore-Gitea-Actions",
            "head_branch": "main",
            "head_sha": "6d8d29a9f7a01ded8f8aeb64341cb31ee1ab5f19",
            "run_number": 2,
            "event": "push",
            "display_title": "More job",
            "status": "success",
            "workflow_id": "demo.yaml",
            "url": "/chester/test/actions/runs/2",
            "created_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:30-04:00",
            "updated_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:33-04:00",
            "run_started_at": "2023-08-22T13:41:30-04:00"
        },
        {
            "id": 1,
            "name": "Explore-Gitea-Actions",
            "head_branch": "main",
            "head_sha": "e5369ab054cae79899ba36e45ee82811a6e0acd5",
            "run_number": 1,
            "event": "push",
            "display_title": "Add job",
            "status": "failure",
            "workflow_id": "demo.yaml",
            "url": "/chester/test/actions/runs/1",
            "created_at": "2023-08-22T13:15:21-04:00",
            "updated_at": "2023-08-22T13:18:10-04:00",
            "run_started_at": "2023-08-22T13:15:21-04:00"
        }
    ],
    "total_count": 3
}
```

---------

Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: puni9869 <80308335+puni9869@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-05-01 09:40:23 +08:00
silverwind 610802df85
Fix tautological conditions (#30735)
As discovered by https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30729.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-04-30 14:34:40 +02:00
silverwind 9b2536b78f
Update misspell to 0.5.1 and add `misspellings.csv` (#30573)
Misspell 0.5.0 supports passing a csv file to extend the list of
misspellings, so I added some common ones from the codebase. There is at
least one typo in a API response so we need to decided whether to revert
that and then likely remove the dict entry.
2024-04-27 08:03:49 +00:00
wxiaoguang 48d4580dd5
Clarify permission "HasAccess" behavior (#30585)
Follow #30495

"HasAccess" behavior wasn't clear, to make it clear:

* Use a new name `HasAnyUnitAccess`, it will be easier to review related
code and permission problems.
* Separate everyone access mode to a separate field, then all calls to
HasAccess are reverted to old behavior before #30495.
* Add new tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-04-20 03:15:04 +00:00
wxiaoguang 3feba9f1f4
Allow everyone to read or write a wiki by a repo unit setting (#30495)
Replace #6312
Help #5833
Wiki solution for #639
2024-04-17 15:58:37 +00:00
Edward Zhang 02e183bf3f
Fix branch_protection api shows users/teams who has no readAccess (#30291)
Add some logic in `convert.ToBranchProtection` to return only the names
associated with readAccess instead of returning all names. This will
ensure consistency in behavior between the frontend and backend.
Fixes: #27694

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: wenzhuo.zhang <wenzhuo.zhang@geely.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-04-17 15:24:07 +02:00
Tobias Balle-Petersen 58b204b813
Update API to return 'source_id' for users (#29718)
Using the API, a user's _source_id_ can be set in the _CreateUserOption_
model, but the field is not returned in the _User_ model.

This PR updates the _User_ model to include the field _source_id_ (The
ID of the Authentication Source).
2024-04-16 06:08:48 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 908426aa0f
Fix missed doer (#30231)
Fix #29879

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-04-08 21:26:41 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 62f8174aa2
Performance improvements for pull request list page (#29900)
This PR will avoid load pullrequest.Issue twice in pull request list
page. It will reduce x times database queries for those WIP pull
requests.

Partially fix #29585

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-03-21 14:13:08 +01:00
Lunny Xiao 83ba882bab
Fix possible NPE in ToPullReviewList (#29759)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-03-13 19:46:15 +00:00
Denys Konovalov fe6792dff3
Enable/disable owner and repo projects independently (#28805)
Part of #23318 

Add menu in repo settings to allow for repo admin to decide not just if
projects are enabled or disabled per repo, but also which kind of
projects (repo-level/owner-level) are enabled. If repo projects
disabled, don't show the projects tab.


![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b9b43fb4-824b-47f9-b8e2-12004313647c)

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-03-04 02:56:52 +00:00
wxiaoguang bf6502a8f7
Fix incorrect relative/absolute URL usages (#29531)
Add two "HTMLURL" methods for PackageDescriptor. 
And rename "FullWebLink" to "VersionWebLink"
2024-03-02 17:38:38 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 29f149bd9f
Move context from modules to services (#29440)
Since `modules/context` has to depend on `models` and many other
packages, it should be moved from `modules/context` to
`services/context` according to design principles. There is no logic
code change on this PR, only move packages.

- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/context` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context`
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/contexttest` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/contexttest` because of depending on
context
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/upload` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context/upload` because of depending on
context
2024-02-27 08:12:22 +01:00
Chris Copeland 47b5965862
Add merge style `fast-forward-only` (#28954)
With this option, it is possible to require a linear commit history with
the following benefits over the next best option `Rebase+fast-forward`:
The original commits continue existing, with the original signatures
continuing to stay valid instead of being rewritten, there is no merge
commit, and reverting commits becomes easier.

Closes #24906
2024-02-12 23:37:23 +01:00
Bram Hagens 50f55f11c4
Show whether a PR is WIP inside popups (#28975)
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2257

Draft status of a PR is currently not exposed by the API. This PR adds a
'draft' field to pull requests in the API, which is used to correctly
set the PR color/icon in a ContextPopup.

---

Before:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/5541521/72cbd30e-1175-4338-aa97-ac99c46c5118)

After:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/5541521/111c9eba-460e-4d57-bcca-23a151c3a4f1)
2024-02-04 22:37:45 +00:00
Zettat123 adc3598a75
Fix an actions schedule bug (#28942)
In #28691, schedule plans will be deleted when a repo's actions unit is
disabled. But when the unit is enabled, the schedule plans won't be
created again.

This PR fixes the bug. The schedule plans will be created again when the
actions unit is re-enabled
2024-01-31 14:55:12 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 5f82ead13c
Simplify how git repositories are opened (#28937)
## Purpose
This is a refactor toward building an abstraction over managing git
repositories.
Afterwards, it does not matter anymore if they are stored on the local
disk or somewhere remote.

## What this PR changes
We used `git.OpenRepository` everywhere previously.
Now, we should split them into two distinct functions:

Firstly, there are temporary repositories which do not change:

```go
git.OpenRepository(ctx, diskPath)
```

Gitea managed repositories having a record in the database in the
`repository` table are moved into the new package `gitrepo`:

```go
gitrepo.OpenRepository(ctx, repo_model.Repo)
```

Why is `repo_model.Repository` the second parameter instead of file
path?
Because then we can easily adapt our repository storage strategy.
The repositories can be stored locally, however, they could just as well
be stored on a remote server.

## Further changes in other PRs
- A Git Command wrapper on package `gitrepo` could be created. i.e.
`NewCommand(ctx, repo_model.Repository, commands...)`. `git.RunOpts{Dir:
repo.RepoPath()}`, the directory should be empty before invoking this
method and it can be filled in the function only. #28940
- Remove the `RepoPath()`/`WikiPath()` functions to reduce the
possibility of mistakes.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-27 21:09:51 +01:00
Jimmy Praet 5d3fdd1212
Add branch protection setting for ignoring stale approvals (#28498)
Fixes #27114.

* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.

For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.

So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 07:20:01 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 70c4aad8e1
Move more functions to db.Find (#28419)
Following #28220

This PR move more functions to use `db.Find`.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 02:19:25 +00:00
KN4CK3R 595a9291b6
Fix `convert.ToTeams` on empty input (#28426)
Fixes #28420

Don't return `nil` if the input was empty.
2024-01-11 22:12:08 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 408a484224
Adjust object format interface (#28469)
- Remove `ObjectFormatID`
- Remove function `ObjectFormatFromID`.
- Use `Sha1ObjectFormat` directly but not a pointer because it's an
empty struct.
- Store `ObjectFormatName` in `repository` struct
2023-12-17 11:56:08 +00:00
Adam Majer cbf923e87b
Abstract hash function usage (#28138)
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.

This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
2023-12-13 21:02:00 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 16d15ce087
Fix package webhook (#27839)
Fix #23742

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-10-31 04:43:38 +00:00
JakobDev 76a85a4ce9
Final round of `db.DefaultContext` refactor (#27587)
Last part of #27065
2023-10-14 08:37:24 +00:00
JakobDev ebe803e514
Penultimate round of `db.DefaultContext` refactor (#27414)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-11 04:24:07 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 5c9fbcca00
Fix attachment download bug (#27486) 2023-10-10 15:33:56 +00:00
JakobDev cc5df26680
Even more `db.DefaultContext` refactor (#27352)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-10-03 10:30:41 +00:00
JakobDev cf0df023be
More `db.DefaultContext` refactor (#27265)
Part of #27065

This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
2023-09-29 12:12:54 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 673cf6af76
make writing main test easier (#27270)
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-28 01:38:53 +00:00
JakobDev 7047df36d4
Another round of `db.DefaultContext` refactor (#27103)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-09-25 13:17:37 +00:00
Nabapadma-sarker 8e23524b18
Fix PushEvent NullPointerException jenkinsci/github-plugin (#27203)
Fixes #27202
2023-09-24 19:02:47 +00:00
Daniel Kilimnik 0ee7cbf725
Fix push mirror, wrong timestamp format (#27153)
I noticed, that the push mirrors endpoint, is the only endpoint which
returns the times in long format rather than as time.Time().

I think the behavior should be consistent across the project.

----

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

This PR changes the time format used in API responses for all
push_mirror endpoints which return a push mirror.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-09-23 12:15:05 +00:00
KN4CK3R c766140dad
Add `RemoteAddress` to mirrors (#26952)
This PR adds a new field `RemoteAddress` to both mirror types which
contains the sanitized remote address for easier (database) access to
that information. Will be used in the audit PR if merged.
2023-09-16 16:03:02 +00:00
JakobDev 76659b1114
Reduce usage of `db.DefaultContext` (#27073)
Part of #27065

This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.

Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-14 17:09:32 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 4f32abaf94
move repository deletion to service layer (#26948)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-08 04:51:15 +00:00
Earl Warren a9ce570298
add Upload URL to release API (#26663)
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/580
- Return a `upload_field` to any release API response, which points to
the API URL for uploading new assets.
- Adds unit test.
- Adds integration testing to verify URL is returned correctly and that
upload endpoint actually works

---------

Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
2023-08-24 10:36:10 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu 23addde28e
feat: implement organization secret creation API (#26566)
- Add a new `CreateSecretOption` struct for creating secrets
- Implement a `CreateOrgSecret` function to create a secret in an
organization
- Add a new route in `api.go` to handle the creation of organization
secrets
- Update the Swagger template to include the new `CreateOrgSecret` API
endpoint

---------

Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-22 11:20:34 +08:00
puni9869 cafce3b4b5
Allow to archive labels (#26478)
## Archived labels 

This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.

## Changes

1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB

## Outsourced for the future

There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.

## Screenshots

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/208f95cd-42e4-4ed7-9a1f-cd2050a645d4)

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/746428e0-40bb-45b3-b992-85602feb371d)

Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-08-14 11:56:14 +02:00
JakobDev ea385f5d39
Fix API leaking Usermail if not logged in (#25097)
The API should only return the real Mail of a User, if the caller is
logged in. The check do to this don't work. This PR fixes this. This not
really a security issue, but can lead to Spam.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-07-31 01:18:38 +00:00