Commit Graph

569 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tim de2ad2e1b1
Make admins adhere to branch protection rules (#32248)
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.

Fixes #17131

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-10-23 12:39:43 +08:00
yp05327 70b7df0e5e
Support repo license (#24872)
Close #278
Close #24076

## Solutions:
- Use
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/)
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[go-license-detector](https://github.com/go-enry/go-license-detector):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1576092178
- Generate License Convert Name List to avoid import license templates
with same contents
Gitea automatically get latest license data from[
spdx/license-list-data](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data).
But unfortunately, some license templates have same contents. #20915
[click here to see the
list](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1584141684)
So we will generate a list of these license templates with same contents
and create a new file to save the result when using `make
generate-license`. (Need to decide the save path)
- Save License info into a new table `repo_license`
Can easily support searching repo by license in the future.

## Screen shot
Single License:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/41260bd7-0b4c-4038-8592-508706cffa9f)

Multiple Licenses:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/34ce2f73-7e18-446b-9b96-ecc4fb61bd70)

Triggers:
- [x] Push commit to default branch
- [x] Create repo
- [x] Mirror repo
- [x] When Default Branch is changed, licenses should be updated

Todo:
- [x] Save Licenses info in to DB when there's a change to license file
in the commit
- [x] DB Migration
- [x] A nominal test?
- [x] Select which library to
use(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167)
- [x] API Support
- [x] Add repo license table
- ~Select license in settings if there are several licenses(Not
recommended)~
- License board(later, not in this PR)

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/2c3c3bf8-bcc2-4c6d-8ce0-81d1a9733878)

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
2024-10-01 15:25:08 -04:00
techknowlogick d9a7748cdc
bump to go 1.23 (#31855) 2024-09-10 02:23:07 +00:00
Lunny Xiao ccf7366db0
Add tag name in the commits list (#31082)
Fix #10036

This PR adds some labels for tags of this commit after the commit
message on the commits table. The tag template is share as commit
graph's.

Desktop:
<img width="1302" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/ba94e1e6-2a3d-44f3-85a3-575fb5667c97">

Mobile:
<img width="370" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/e3eb1f44-3686-4012-aa9d-52cd88b22c0e">
2024-08-19 17:04:06 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 791d7fc76a
Add issue comment when moving issues from one column to another of the project (#29311)
Fix #27278
Replace #27816

This PR adds a meta-comment for an issue when dragging an issue from one
column to another of a project.

<img width="600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/5fc1d954-430e-4db0-aaee-a00006fa91f5">

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
2024-08-09 01:29:02 +00:00
Jason Song 687c118248
Clear up old Actions logs (#31735)
Part of #24256.

Clear up old action logs to free up storage space.

Users will see a message indicating that the log has been cleared if
they view old tasks.

<img width="1361" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9f0f3a3a-bc5a-402f-90ca-49282d196c22">

Docs: https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/40

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2024-08-02 00:42:08 +00:00
Denys Konovalov a8d0c879c3
add skip secondary authorization option for public oauth2 clients (#31454) 2024-07-19 14:28:30 -04:00
Lunny Xiao 0d08bb6112
Upgrade xorm to v1.3.9 and improve some migrations Sync (#29899)
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2024-07-14 17:15:59 -04:00
Henry Goodman 12cb1d2998
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086)
Fixes #22722 

### Problem
Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).

The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.

### Solution
Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.

It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.

This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)

This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`

### Updated Branch Protection UI:

<img width="943" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">

### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source
branch `test` being a protected branch:


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc)
<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-07-05 18:21:56 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 98a61040b1
Fix the possible migration failure on 286 with postgres 16 (#31209)
Try to fix #31205
2024-06-02 03:01:08 +00:00
metiftikci aa92b13164
Prevent simultaneous editing of comments and issues (#31053)
fixes #22907 

Tested:
- [x] issue content edit
- [x] issue content change tasklist
- [x] pull request content edit
- [x] pull request change tasklist

![issue-content-edit](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/29250154/a0828889-fb96-4bc4-8600-da92e3205812)
2024-05-27 15:34:18 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 98751108b1
Rename project board -> column to make the UI less confusing (#30170)
This PR split the `Board` into two parts. One is the struct has been
renamed to `Column` and the second we have a `Template Type`.

But to make it easier to review, this PR will not change the database
schemas, they are just renames. The database schema changes could be in
future PRs.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
2024-05-27 08:59:54 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 40de54ece8
Remove If Exist check on migration for mssql because that syntax required SQL server 2016 (#30894)
Fix #30872

We will assume the database is consistent before executing the
migration. So the indexes should exist. Removing `IF EXIST` then is safe
enough.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2024-05-11 22:16:09 +08:00
wxiaoguang 6d2a307ad8
Rename migration package name for 1.22-rc1 (#30730)
Ref: Propose to restart 1.22 release #30501
2024-04-27 14:02:07 +00:00
silverwind 9b2536b78f
Update misspell to 0.5.1 and add `misspellings.csv` (#30573)
Misspell 0.5.0 supports passing a csv file to extend the list of
misspellings, so I added some common ones from the codebase. There is at
least one typo in a API response so we need to decided whether to revert
that and then likely remove the dict entry.
2024-04-27 08:03:49 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 2ad9ef4984
Fix some bug on migrations (#30647)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23894#discussion_r1573718690
2024-04-24 01:58:24 +00:00
Lunny Xiao e94864e86c
Fix wrong table name (#30557)
The table name should be `oauth2_application` but `o_auth2_application`

Caused by
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21316/files#diff-9610efbc608a41f1f2eaff5790423f0a187906f6ff0beb23a5e8d18366cc2ccfR38
2024-04-23 03:00:57 +00:00
silverwind 74f0c84fa4
Enable more `revive` linter rules (#30608)
Noteable additions:

- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches

Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.
2024-04-22 11:48:42 +00:00
wxiaoguang 3feba9f1f4
Allow everyone to read or write a wiki by a repo unit setting (#30495)
Replace #6312
Help #5833
Wiki solution for #639
2024-04-17 15:58:37 +00:00
Lunny Xiao e20428d8f6
Fix commitstatus summary (#30431)
The target_url is necessary for the UI, but missed in
commit_status_summary table. This PR fix it.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-04-14 14:16:54 +02:00
Lunny Xiao fc34481d05
Add commit status summary table to reduce query from commit status table (#30223)
This PR adds a new table named commit status summary to reduce queries
from the commit status table. After this change, commit status summary
table will be used for the final result, commit status table will be for
details.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2024-04-12 09:41:50 +08:00
Lunny Xiao b482567059
Add unique index for project_issue to prevent duplicate data (#30190)
Fix #27639
2024-04-02 16:02:05 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 40cdc84b36
Fix migration v292 (#30153)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29874#discussion_r1542227686

- The migration of v292 will miss many projects. These projects will
have no default board. This PR introduced a new migration number and
removed v292 migration.

- This PR also added the missed transactions on project-related
operations.

- Only `SetDefaultBoard` will remove duplicated defaults but not in
`GetDefaultBoard`
2024-03-28 16:14:30 +00:00
Denys Konovalov e5160185ed
Add default board to new projects, remove uncategorized pseudo-board (#29874)
On creation of an empty project (no template) a default board will be
created instead of falling back to the uneditable pseudo-board.

Every project now has to have exactly one default boards. As a
consequence, you cannot unset a board as default, instead you have to
set another board as default. Existing projects will be modified using a
cron job, additionally this check will run every midnight by default.

Deleting the default board is not allowed, you have to set another board
as default to do it.

Fixes #29873
Fixes #14679 along the way
Fixes #29853

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-03-27 20:54:32 +00:00
Lunny Xiao d8bd6f34f0
Do some performance optimize for issues list and view issue/pull (#29515)
This PR do some performance optimzations.

- [x] Add `index` for the column `comment_id` of `Attachment` table to
accelerate query from the database.
- [x] Remove unnecessary database queries when viewing issues. Before
some conditions which id = 0 will be sent to the database
- [x] Remove duplicated load posters 
- [x] Batch loading attachements, isread of comments on viewing issue

---------

Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
2024-03-12 07:23:44 +00:00
oliverpool 26653b196b
Store webhook event in database (#29145)
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.

---

## Current webhook flow

1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request

This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.

Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request

So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.

## Consequences of the refactor

- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)

So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).

Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.

As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go` 
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)
2024-03-07 23:18:38 +01:00
Lunny Xiao 45277486c2
Fix bug hidden on CI and make ci failed if tests failure (#29254)
The tests on migration tests failed but CI reports successfully


https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/actions/runs/7364373807/job/20044685969#step:8:141

This PR will fix the bug on migration v283 and also the CI hidden
behaviour.

The reason is on the Makefile

`GITEA_ROOT="$(CURDIR)" GITEA_CONF=tests/mysql.ini $(GO) test
$(GOTESTFLAGS) -tags='$(TEST_TAGS)' $(MIGRATE_TEST_PACKAGES)` will
return the error exit code.

But 

`for pkg in $(shell $(GO) list
code.gitea.io/gitea/models/migrations/...); do \
GITEA_ROOT="$(CURDIR)" GITEA_CONF=tests/mysql.ini $(GO) test
$(GOTESTFLAGS) -tags '$(TEST_TAGS)' $$pkg; \
	done`

will not work.

This also fix #29602
2024-03-07 17:43:32 +01:00
wxiaoguang 5cddab4f74
Make wiki default branch name changable (#29603)
Fix #29000
Fix #28685
Fix #18568

Related: #27497

And by the way fix #24036, add a Cancel button there (one line)
2024-03-06 14:26:32 +08:00
KN4CK3R c337ff0ec7
Add user blocking (#29028)
Fixes #17453

This PR adds the abbility to block a user from a personal account or
organization to restrict how the blocked user can interact with the
blocker. The docs explain what's the consequence of blocking a user.

Screenshots:


![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/4ed884f3-e06a-4862-afd3-3b8aa2488dc6)


![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/ae6d4981-f252-4f50-a429-04f0f9f1cdf1)


![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/ca153599-5b0f-4b4a-90fe-18bdfd6f0b6b)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2024-03-04 08:16:03 +00:00
techknowlogick cb52b17f92
Add admin API route for managing user's badges (#23106)
Fix #22785

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2024-03-01 03:23:28 -05:00
KN4CK3R f79c9e817a
Use `crypto/sha256` (#29386)
Go 1.21 improved the performance of `crypto/sha256`. It's now similar to
`minio/sha256-simd`, so we should just use the standard libs.

https://go.dev/doc/go1.21#crypto/sha256
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/408795
https://github.com/multiformats/go-multihash/pull/173
2024-02-25 13:32:13 +00:00
Adam Majer d68a613ba8
Add support for sha256 repositories (#23894)
Currently only SHA1 repositories are supported by Gitea. This adds
support for alternate SHA256 with the additional aim of easier support
for additional hash types in the future.

Fixes: #13794
Limited by: https://github.com/go-git/go-git/issues/899
Depend on: #28138

<img width="776" alt="图片" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/5448c9a7-608e-4341-a149-5dd0069c9447">

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2024-01-19 17:05:02 +01:00
yp05327 07ba4d9f87
Fix incorrect action duration time when rerun the job before executed once (#28364)
Fix #28323
Reason was mentioned here:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28323#issuecomment-1841867298

### Changes: (maybe breaking)
We can rerun jobs in Gitea, so there will be some problems in
calculating duration time.
In this PR, I use the exist `Started` and `Stopped` column to record the
last run time instead of the total time,
and add a new `PreviousDuration` column to record the previous duration
time.
You can also check the cost time of last run:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/2ca39145-2c92-401a-b78b-43164f7ae061)
2024-01-19 14:05:49 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 2bdab948cb
Add missing migration (#28827)
Missed from #28498
2024-01-17 17:26:45 +08:00
Jimmy Praet 5d3fdd1212
Add branch protection setting for ignoring stale approvals (#28498)
Fixes #27114.

* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.

For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.

So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 07:20:01 +00:00
Lunny Xiao cb10f2767c
Fix migration test (#28659) 2023-12-30 21:54:48 +08:00
sebastian-sauer e08f1a9cbd
Add combined index for issue_user.uid and issue_id (#28080)
fixes #27877

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-12-14 09:26:59 +00:00
Nate Levesque f891172ef4
handle repository.size column being NULL in migration v263 (#28336)
This resolves a problem I encountered while updating gitea from 1.20.4
to 1.21. For some reason (correct or otherwise) there are some values in
`repository.size` that are NULL in my gitea database which cause this
migration to fail due to the NOT NULL constraints.

Log snippet (excuse the escape characters)
```
ESC[36mgitea                |ESC[0m 2023-12-04T03:52:28.573122395Z 2023/12/04 03:52:28 ...ations/migrations.go:641:Migrate() [I] Migration[263]: Add git_size and lfs_size columns to repository table
ESC[36mgitea                |ESC[0m 2023-12-04T03:52:28.608705544Z 2023/12/04 03:52:28 routers/common/db.go:36:InitDBEngine() [E] ORM engine initialization attempt #3/10 failed. Error: migrate: migration[263]: Add git_size and lfs_size columns to repository table failed: NOT NULL constraint failed: repository.git_size
```

I assume this should be reasonably safe since `repository.git_size` has
a default value of 0 but I don't know if that value being 0 in the odd
situation where `repository.size == NULL` has any problematic
consequences.
2023-12-05 14:31:13 +00:00
JakobDev c8602a8dfa
Add Index to pull_auto_merge.doer_id (#27811)
Reported at https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1677

This column is used by
[deleteUser](f089be91da/services/user/delete.go (L90)).

Note: This PR contains a Migration, so we can't backport it to 1.21.
2023-10-30 08:39:29 +00:00
KN4CK3R c6c829fe3f
Enhanced auth token / remember me (#27606)
Closes #27455

> The mechanism responsible for long-term authentication (the 'remember
me' cookie) uses a weak construction technique. It will hash the user's
hashed password and the rands value; it will then call the secure cookie
code, which will encrypt the user's name with the computed hash. If one
were able to dump the database, they could extract those two values to
rebuild that cookie and impersonate a user. That vulnerability exists
from the date the dump was obtained until a user changed their password.
> 
> To fix this security issue, the cookie could be created and verified
using a different technique such as the one explained at
https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies.

The PR removes the now obsolete setting `COOKIE_USERNAME`.
2023-10-14 00:56:41 +00:00
silverwind 5bf367f904
Restore warning commit status (#27504)
Partial revert of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25839. This
commit status is used by a number of external integrations, so I think
we should not remove it (See
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25839#issuecomment-1729002077).
This is a rare case where an existing migration needed to be alterted to
avoid data loss.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-10-08 22:16:06 +00:00
silverwind 023e937141
Rename the default themes to gitea-light, gitea-dark, gitea-auto (#27419)
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27097:

- `gitea` theme is renamed to `gitea-light`
- `arc-green` theme is renamed to `gitea-dark`
- `auto` theme is renamed to `gitea-auto`

I put both themes in separate CSS files, removing all colors from the
base CSS. Existing users will be migrated to the new theme names. The
dark theme recolor will follow in a separate PR.

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

1. If there are existing custom themes with the names `gitea-light` or
`gitea-dark`, rename them before this upgrade and update the `theme`
column in the `user` table for each affected user.
2. The theme in `<html>` has moved from `class="theme-name"` to
`data-theme="name"`, existing customizations that depend on should be
updated.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-10-06 09:46:36 +02:00
wxiaoguang 9f8d59858a
Refactor system setting (#27000)
This PR reduces the complexity of the system setting system.

It only needs one line to introduce a new option, and the option can be
used anywhere out-of-box.

It is still high-performant (and more performant) because the config
values are cached in the config system.
2023-10-05 09:08:19 +08:00
JakobDev 4636f56e7b
Add Index to `action.user_id` (#27403)
Another Column that needs a Index. Found at
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/61#issuecomment-1258744.

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-10-03 21:41:25 -04:00
JakobDev 9d9cebc5e7
Add Index to `comment.dependent_issue_id` (#27325)
This Column is missing index. It is used by
[issue_service.deleteIssue](7ea2a910ce/services/issue/issue.go (L300)).

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-09-28 22:58:35 +02:00
Lunny Xiao eab20cb6bd
Fix more yaml lint errors (#27284)
Fix #27268
2023-09-26 12:56:42 -04:00
JakobDev 14731a34ff
Add index to `issue_user.issue_id` (#27154)
This fixes a performance bottleneck. It was discovered by Codeberg.
Every where query on that table (which has grown big over time) uses
this column, but there is no index on it.

See this part of the log which was posted on Matrix:
```
2023/09/10 00:52:01 ...rs/web/repo/issue.go:1446:ViewIssue() [W] [Slow SQL Query] UPDATE `issue_user` SET is_read=? WHERE uid=? AND issue_id=? [true x y] - 51.395434887s
2023/09/10 00:52:01 ...rs/web/repo/issue.go:1447:ViewIssue() [E] ReadBy: Error 1205 (HY000): Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction
2023/09/10 00:52:01 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET /Codeberg/Community/issues/1201 for [::ffff:xxx]:0, 500 Internal Server Error in 52384.2ms @ repo/issue.go:1256(repo.ViewIssue)
```
2023-09-21 01:30:48 +00:00
Lunny Xiao e644cc9448
Fix wrong xorm get usage on migration (#27111)
Fix the bug on try.gitea.io

```log
2023/09/18 01:48:41 ...ations/migrations.go:635:Migrate() [I] Migration[276]: Add RemoteAddress to mirrors
2023/09/18 01:48:41 routers/common/db.go:34:InitDBEngine() [E] ORM engine initialization attempt #7/10 failed. Error: migrate: migration[276]: Add RemoteAddress to mirrors failed: exit status 128 - fatal: not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /)
Stopping at filesystem boundary (GIT_DISCOVERY_ACROSS_FILESYSTEM not set).
 - fatal: not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /)
Stopping at filesystem boundary (GIT_DISCOVERY_ACROSS_FILESYSTEM not set).
```

Caused by #26952

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-09-18 22:59:19 +03:00
Lunny Xiao dcf4b9e314
Fix wrong migration for email address (#27106)
On Iterate, `sess` should not be used in the closure function body.

Caused by #26952
2023-09-17 11:15:04 +08:00
KN4CK3R c766140dad
Add `RemoteAddress` to mirrors (#26952)
This PR adds a new field `RemoteAddress` to both mirror types which
contains the sanitized remote address for easier (database) access to
that information. Will be used in the audit PR if merged.
2023-09-16 16:03:02 +00:00