Now that reading btrfs usage, UUID and label can be performed on a file
system image remove the need for a loop device for the relevant unit
tests.
Closes!105 - Update used btrfs file system commands, new minimum is
btrfs-progs 4.5
For FAT16/32 and XFS file systems clearing the label uses different
command options and code path in file system specific ::write_label()
method. Therefore extend this unit test to also test clearing the
label.
During review and testing of this patchset it was discovered that using
GParted to set a new UUID on a FAT16 or FAT32 file system that there was
a new unwanted side effect of clearing the label.
Add unit test to cover this error scenario. It does the following:
1. Creates a file system with a known label;
2. Writes a new UUID;
3. Reads the label and confirms it matches the initial label.
This new unit test captures the fault like this:
$ ./test_SupportedFileSystems --gtest_filter='*CreateAndWriteUUIDAndReadLabel*'
...
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUIDAndReadLabel/fat16
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:645: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
fs_label
Which is: "TEST_LABEL"
m_partition.get_filesystem_label().c_str()
Which is: ""
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUIDAndReadLabel/fat16, where GetParam() = 13 (21 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUIDAndReadLabel/fat32
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:645: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
fs_label
Which is: "TEST_LABEL"
m_partition.get_filesystem_label().c_str()
Which is: ""
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUIDAndReadLabel/fat32, where GetParam() = 14 (22 ms)
Don't forget to exclude this unit test for file systems which need a
loop device but which fails to be created inside the docker CI image.
Reference:
39fdfe51da
Exclude unit tests needing losetup in Docker CI image (!59)
Closes!104 - Add Alpine Linux CI jobs and resolve label and UUID issues
with FAT16/32
The GitLab CI ubuntu_test job has occasionally been failing like this,
perhaps once every few weeks or so.
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/reiser4
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:569: Failure
Expected: (m_partition.uuid.size()) >= (9U), actual: 0 vs 9
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/reiser4, where GetParam() = 24 (17 ms)
[----------] 1 test from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest (17 ms total)
Turns out there are 2 bugs in resier4progs. One causes debugfs.reiser4
to report a null UUID if the first byte of the UUID happens to be zero
[1], and the other cases mkfs.resier4 to write a corrupted UUID,
sometimes a null (all zeros) UUID [2].
There is a 1 in 256 chance of getting a null UUID [2] when creating and
reading a reiser4 file system, hence the occasional failure of the CI
job. The centos_test job isn't affected because CentOS doesn't have the
reiser4progs package.
Fix this by detecting when reiser4 reports a null UUID and assign a
dummy UUID to make the test pass. This does mean that there is a 1 in
256 chance of not detecting a true failure. However that still means
there is a 255 in 256 chance of detecting a true failure. That's good
odds. When a null UUID is detected for a reiser4 file system the test
output looks like this:
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/reiser4
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:580: Ignore test failure of a null UUID.
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/reiser4 (46 ms)
[1] 4802cdb18a
Fix up repair_master_print()
[2] 44cc024f39
Stop occasionally making file systems with null UUIDs
Closes#145 - Sporadic failure of test case
My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/reiser4
So far the read file system usage figures, read via the file system
interface classes using file system specific tools, have been checked to
the exact sector for:
0 <= used <= size
0 <= unused <= size
unallocated = 0
used + unused = size
However for JFS and NTFS this fails like this:
# ./test_SupportedFileSystems --gtest_filter='*ReadUsage/*' | fgrep ' ms'
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/btrfs (335 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/exfat (0 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/ext2 (38 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/ext3 (131 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/ext4 (32 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/f2fs (47 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/fat16 (19 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/fat32 (48 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/hfs (0 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/hfsplus (0 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/jfs, where GetParam() = 17 (73 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/linuxswap (20 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/luks (0 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/lvm2pv (410 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/minix (0 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/nilfs2 (226 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/ntfs, where GetParam() = 23 (56 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/reiser4 (49 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/reiserfs (139 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/udf (34 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/xfs (67 ms)
[----------] 21 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest (1726 ms total)
[==========] 21 tests from 1 test case ran. (1726 ms total)
# ./test_SupportedFileSystems --gtest_filter='*ReadUsage/jfs:*ReadUsage/ntfs'
Running main() from test_SupportedFileSystems.cc
Note: Google Test filter = *ReadUsage/jfs:*ReadUsage/ntfs
[==========] Running 2 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 2 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/jfs
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:465: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
m_partition.sectors_unallocated
Which is: 2472
0
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:517: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
m_partition.sectors_used + m_partition.sectors_unused
Which is: 521816
m_partition.get_sector_length()
Which is: 524288
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/jfs, where GetParam() = 17 (36 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/ntfs
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:465: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
m_partition.sectors_unallocated
Which is: 8
0
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:517: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
m_partition.sectors_used + m_partition.sectors_unused
Which is: 524280
m_partition.get_sector_length()
Which is: 524288
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/ntfs, where GetParam() = 23 (35 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest (71 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 2 tests from 1 test case ran. (72 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 0 tests.
[ FAILED ] 2 tests, listed below:
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/jfs, where GetParam() = 17
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/ntfs, where GetParam() = 23
2 FAILED TESTS
So JFS is reporting 2472 unallocated sectors in a size of 524288 sectors
and NTFS is reporting 8 unallocated sectors in the same size. This
exact issue is already solved for GParted so that it doesn't show a
small amount of unallocated space by commits [1][2] from Bug 499202 [3].
Fix the same way, use the accessors to the file system usage figures
which don't show unallocated space when it is below the significant
threshold.
[1] b5c80f18a9
Enhance calculation of significant unallocated space (#499202)
[2] 7ebedc4bb3
Don't show intrinsic unallocated space (#499202)
[3] Bug 499202 - gparted does not see the difference if partition size
differs from filesystem size
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499202Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
Checking a MINIX V3 file system fails like this:
$ ./test_SupportedFileSystems --gtest_filter='*Check/minix'
...
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/minix
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:554: Failure
Value of: m_fs_object->check_repair(m_partition, m_operation_detail)
Actual: false
Expected: true
Operation details:
mkfs.minix -3 '/home/centos/programming/c/gparted/tests/test_SupportedFileSystems.img' 00:00:00 (SUCCESS)
87392 inodes
262144 blocks
Firstdatazone=5507 (5507)
Zonesize=1024
Maxsize=2147483647
fsck.minix '/home/centos/programming/c/gparted/tests/test_SupportedFileSystems.img' 00:00:00 (ERROR)
fsck.minix from util-linux 2.23.2
bad magic number in super-block
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/minix, where GetParam() = 21 (182 ms)
fsck.minix doesn't support checking MINIX V3 file systems until this
commit, first included in util-linux 2.27 released 2015-09-07.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=86a9f3dad58addb50eca9daa9d233827a005dad7
fsck.minix: add minix v3 support
CentOS 7 only includes util-linux 2.23.2 so is affected by this, however
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS includes util-linux 2.31.1 so is not affected.
Just always skip this test for now. Plan to re-enable later when the
oldest supported distributions and GitLab CI images include the needed
util-linux release.
Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
The tests were failing like this:
$ ./test_SupportedFileSystems --gtest_filter='*CreateAndReadUUID/fat16'
....
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/fat16
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:552: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
m_partition.uuid.size()
Which is: 9
36U
Which is: 36
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/fat16, where GetParam() = 13 (45 ms)
This is because the test was expecting a full 36 character UUID as used
by Linux file systems. Also accept shorter 9 character "UUID"s as used
by FAT16/32 file systems.
Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
For NILFS2 the read and write tests which use nilfs-tune all fail using
an image file, even when run as root, however the other tests succeed.
Selected output from the test program:
# ./test_SupportedFileSystems --gtest_filter='*/nilfs2' | fgrep ' ms'
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/nilfs2 (22 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22 (31 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadLabel/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22 (30 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22 (30 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteLabel/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22 (37 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUID/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22 (39 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/nilfs2 (0 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndRemove/nilfs2 (0 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndGrow/nilfs2 (386 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndShrink/nilfs2 (345 ms)
[----------] 10 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest (920 ms total)
[==========] 10 tests from 1 test case ran. (920 ms total)
nilfs-tune fails like this when given an image file:
# truncate -s 256M test.img
# mkfs.nilfs2 test.img
mkfs.nilfs2 (nilfs-utils 2.2.7)
Start writing file system initial data to the device
Blocksize:4096 Device:test.img Device Size:268435456
File system initialization succeeded !!
# nilfs-tune -l test.img
nilfs-tune 2.2.7
nilfs-tune: test.img: cannot open NILFS
# echo $?
1
However using nilfs-tune via a loop device works:
# losetup --show --find /dev/loop0
/dev/loop0
# nilfs-tune -l /dev/loop0
nilfs-tune 2.2.7
Filesystem volume name: (none)
Filesystem UUID: fc49912c-4d39-4672-8610-1e1185d0db5f
Filesystem magic number: 0x3434
Filesystem revision #: 2.0
Filesystem features: (none)
Filesystem state: valid
Filesystem OS type: Linux
Block size: 4096
...
So nilfs-tune only works with block devices. Fix by making these tests
require a loop device and therefore make them root only. Now these
tests are skipped as non-root user and pass as root.
Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
File systems BTRFS, JFS, NILFS2 and XFS can only be resized while
mounted, but only root can mount file systems. Therefore these tests
fail. Also BTRFS resize uses 'btrfs filesystem show' to discover the
devid, which also fails as described in the previous commit message.
Note that root can mount a file system image directly, but that it
implicitly creates loop device:
# truncate -s 256M test.img
# mkfs.xfs test.img
# mount test.img /mnt/1
# fgrep /mnt/1 /proc/mounts
/dev/loop0 /mnt/1 xfs rw,seclabel,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
# losetup -a
/dev/loop0: [64768]:35826659 (/root/test.img)
Therefore make these tests root only and require an explicit loop
device. Now these file system resize tests succeed as root and are
skipped as non-root.
Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
For BTRFS the read (and resize) tests fail when using an image file,
however the create, write and check tests pass. Selected output from
the test program:
$ ./test_SupportedFileSystems --gtest_filter='*/btrfs' | fgrep ' ms'
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/btrfs (43 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7 (95 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadLabel/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7 (158 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7 (164 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteLabel/btrfs (164 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUID/btrfs (132 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/btrfs (129 ms)
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndRemove/btrfs (0 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndGrow/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7 (155 ms)
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndShrink/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7 (97 ms)
[----------] 10 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest (1137 ms total)
[==========] 10 tests from 1 test case ran. (1137 ms total)
The read operations fail because 'btrfs filesystem show' doesn't work on
am image file:
$ truncate -s 256M test.img
$ mkfs.btrfs test.img
btrfs-progs v4.9.1
See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information.
Label: (null)
UUID: de1624ae-39bb-4796-aee4-7ee1fa24c06a
Node side: 16384
Sector size: 4096
Filesystem size: 256.00MiB
Block group profiles:
Data: single
Metadata: DUP
System: DUP
SSD detected: no
Incompat features: extref, skinny-metadata
Number of devices: 1
Devices:
ID SIZE PATH
1 256.00MiB test.img
$ btrfs filesystem show test.img
ERROR: not a valid btrfs filesystem: /home/centos/programming/c/gparted/tests/test.img
$ echo $1
1
Querying a BTRFS image file also fails as root:
$ su
Password:
# btrfs filesystem show test.img
ERROR: not a valid btrfs filesystem: /home/centos/programming/c/gparted/tests/test.img
# echo $1
1
However querying the BTRFS via a loop device succeeds:
# losetup --show --find test.img
/dev/loop0
# btrfs filesystem show /dev/loop0
Label: none uuid: de1624ae-39bb-4796-aee4-7ee1fa24c06a
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 112.00KiB
devid 1 size 256.00MiB used 88.00MiB path /root/test.img
There must be some kernel level BTRFS file system device discovery
happening because now after creating a loop device for the image file,
the BTRFS can be shown via the image file directly:
# btrfs filesystem show test.img
Label: none uuid: de1624ae-39bb-4796-aee4-7ee1fa24c06a
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 112.00KiB
devid 1 size 256.00MiB used 88.00MiB path /root/test.img
Anyway for the BTRFS reading tests make them required a loop device and
therefore root only. Now these tests are skipped as non-root user and
pass as root.
Addressing BTRFS resizing test failures will be handled in a following
commit.
Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
Creating an LVM2 PV as a non-root user on an image file fails like this:
$ truncate -s 256M test.img
$ lvm pvcreate `pwd`/test.img
WARNING: Running as a non-root user. Functionality may be unavailable.
/run/lvm/lvmetad.socket: access failed: Permission denied
WARNING: Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to device scanning.
/run/lock/lvm/P_orphans:aux: open failed: Permission denied
Can't get lock for orphan PVs.
$ echo $?
5
Trying the same as root also fails:
# truncate -s 256M test.img
# lvm pvcreate `pwd`/test.img
Device /root/test.img not found.
# echo $?
5
LVM seems strongly predicated on only using block devices [1]. LVM can
use loop devices though, but loop devices can only be created by root.
# truncate -s 256M test.img
# losetup -f --show `pwd`/test.img
/dev/loop0
# lvm pvcreate /dev/loop0
Physical volume "/dev/loop0" successfully created.
# echo $?
0
Make the LVM2 PV tests require user root and use loop device over the
test image. Tests for the other file system types still directly uses
the image file. This makes the LVM2 PV tests pass when run as root, or
successfully skipped when run as non-root.
[1] lvmconfig --typeconfig default --withcomments --withspace | less
From the "devices" section of the commented default configuration,
LVM uses block devices found below /dev, devices provided by udev
and/or found in sysfs.
Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
Extend testing to all fully supported file systems, those with an
implemented FileSystem derived class.
Note that in main() GParted threading needs to now be initialised before
InitGoogleTest() because it calls INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P() which in
turn calls get_supported_fstypes() which eventually constructs all the
individual file system interface objects and discovers available
support, some of which use execute_command(). Example call chain:
InitGoogleTest()
INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P()
get_supported_fstypes()
setup_supported_filesystems()
{SupportedFileSystems}->find_supported_filesystems()
{btrfs}->get_filesystem_support()
Utils::execute_command()
In the CentOS 7 GitLab CI image the EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise
Linux) repository is added to provide f2fs-tools and ntfsprogs.
23 of 210 tests fail on CentOS 7 and 22 on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. The
following commits will resolve these test failures.
$ ./test_SupportedFileSystems
Running main() from test_SupportedFileSystems.cc
[==========] Running 210 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 210 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest
...
[----------] 210 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest (11066 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 210 tests from 1 test case ran. (11067 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 187 tests.
[ FAILED ] 23 tests, listed below:
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/lvm2pv, where GetParam() = 20
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/jfs, where GetParam() = 17
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/lvm2pv, where GetParam() = 20
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/ntfs, where GetParam() = 23
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadLabel/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadLabel/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/fat16, where GetParam() = 13
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/fat32, where GetParam() = 14
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/jfs, where GetParam() = 17
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteLabel/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUID/nilfs2, where GetParam() = 22
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/lvm2pv, where GetParam() = 20
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/minix, where GetParam() = 21
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndRemove/lvm2pv, where GetParam() = 20
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndGrow/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndGrow/lvm2pv, where GetParam() = 20
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndGrow/xfs, where GetParam() = 27
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndShrink/btrfs, where GetParam() = 7
[ FAILED ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndShrink/lvm2pv, where GetParam() = 20
23 FAILED TESTS
Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
Until now the parameterised test values are printed as part of the test
names as just 0, 1, etc. like this:
$ ./test_SupportedFileSystems
Running main() from test_SupportedFileSystems.cc
[==========] Running 20 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 20 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/0 (48 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/1
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/1 (11 ms)
Provide the file system types as the names for the parameterised test
values [1]. Now the test names are printed like this:
$ ./test_SupportedFileSystems
Running main() from test_SupportedFileSystems.cc
[==========] Running 20 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 20 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/ext2
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/ext2 (51 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/linuxswap
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/linuxswap (11 ms)
Also use these Google Test name friendly ASCII alphanumeric only names
everywhere the file system type needs to be reported in this test
program.
[1] Specifying Names for Value-Parameterized Test Parameters
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/v1.8.x/googletest/docs/advanced.md#specifying-names-for-value-parameterized-test-parametersCloses!49 - Add file system interface tests
Use Google Test Value-Parameterised to call every test for both ext2
and linux-swap.
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/v1.8.x/googletest/docs/advanced.md#value-parameterized-tests
Running the test now looks like this:
$ ./test_SupportedFileSystems
Running main() from test_SupportedFileSystems.cc
[==========] Running 20 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 20 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/0 (97 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/1
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.Create/1 (15 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/0 (106 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/1
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUsage/1 (14 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadLabel/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadLabel/0 (95 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadLabel/1
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadLabel/1 (23 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/0 (99 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/1
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndReadUUID/1 (22 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteLabel/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteLabel/0 (102 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteLabel/1
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteLabel/1 (22 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUID/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUID/0 (101 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUID/1
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndWriteUUID/1 (21 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/0 (153 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/1
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:424: Skip test. check not supported or support not found
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndCheck/1 (0 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndRemove/0
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:437: Skip test. remove not supported or support not found
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndRemove/0 (0 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndRemove/1
test_SupportedFileSystems.cc:437: Skip test. remove not supported or support not found
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndRemove/1 (0 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndGrow/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndGrow/0 (266 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndGrow/1
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndGrow/1 (32 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndShrink/0
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndShrink/0 (111 ms)
[ RUN ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndShrink/1
[ OK ] My/SupportedFileSystemsTest.CreateAndShrink/1 (28 ms)
[----------] 20 tests from My/SupportedFileSystemsTest (1311 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 20 tests from 1 test case ran. (1342 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 20 tests.
Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
Replace directly using ext2 derived FileSystem interface class with
using the SupportedFileSystems class. This is a step in getting ready
for testing all the GParted file system interface classes in one go.
Closes!49 - Add file system interface tests
Mike Fleetwood