Remove unused members: fraction and progress_text from the
OperationDetail class now that the ProgressBar class has superseded
their use. This also allows removal of timer_global member from the
copy_blocks class. Timer_global was only used to track the elapsed time
copying blocks and allow the remaining time to be estimated and written
into progress_text. The ProgressBar class also does this itself
internally.
Bug 760709 - Add progress bars to XFS and EXT2/3/4 file system specific
copy methods
1) Multiple progress bars
The OperationDetail class contains member fraction which is used to feed
data to the current operation progress bar shown in the Applying pending
operations dialog. Dialog_Progress::on_signal_update() gets called for
every updated OperationDetail object and depending on whether fraction
is > 0.0 or not, switches between showing a growing or pulsing progress
bar. This leads to the conclusion that every OperationDetail object
currently being updated is effectively driving the single on screen
progress bar with different data.
The Copy_Blocks code is careful to update text and faction in a single
OperationDetail object and everything is good. The on screen progress
bar is switched into growing mode and then grows to 100%.
Since external command output is updated in real time [1] there are two
OperationDetail objects, one for stdout and one for stderr, which are
updated whenever data is read from the relevant stream. Also now that
progress is interpreted from some external command output [2][3][4] a
separate OperationDetail object is getting updated with the progress
fraction. (Actually the grandparent OperationDetail of the ones
receiving stdout and stderr updates as used by the file system specific
*_progress() methods). In the normal case of an external command
which is reporting it's progress two OperationDetails are constantly
being updated together, the OperationDetail object tracking stdout and
it's grandparent receiving progress fraction updates. This causes the
the code in Dialog_Progress::on_signal_update() to constantly switch
between growing and pulsing progress bar mode. The only reason this
doesn't flash the progress bar is because the stdout OperationDetail
object is updated first and before the 100 ms timeout fires to pulse the
bar, it's grandparent is updated with the new fraction to keep growing
the bar instead.
2) Common code
The Copy_Blocks code currently tracks the progress of blocks copied
against target amount, which it has to do anyway. That information is
then used to generate the text and fraction to update into the
OperationDetail object and drive the on screen progress bar. This same
level of tracking is wanted for the XFS and ext2/3/4 file system
specific copy methods.
Conclusion and solution
Having multiple sources of progress bar data is a problem and makes it
clear that there must be only one source of progress data. Also some
code can be shared for tracking the amount of blocks copied and
generating the display.
Therefore have a single ProgressBar object which is used everywhere.
This commit
It just creates a single ProgressBar object which is available via all
OperationDetail objects and Copy_Blocks is updated accordingly. Note
that the ProgressBar still contains debugging and that the GUI progress
bar of the current operation is still driven via the fraction member in
any OperationDetail object.
Referenced commits:
[1] 52a2a9b00a
Reduce threading (#685740)
[2] ae434579e1
Display progress for e2fsck (#467925)
[3] baea186138
Display progress for mke2fs (#467925)
[4] 57b028bb8e
Display progress during resize (#467925)
Bug 760709 - Add progress bars to XFS and EXT2/3/4 file system specific
copy methods
Write a generic progress bar class. Has the following features:
* Has separate progress and target numbers, rather than a single
completion fraction, to enable the the next feature.
* Optionally generates text reporting the amount of data copied using
the progress and target numbers like this:
"1.00 MiB of 16.00 MiB copied"
* After running for 5 seconds, also add estimated remaining time.
(Waits to allow the data copying rate to settle down a little before
estimating the remaining time). Looks like this:
"1.00 MiB of 16.00 MiB copied (00:01:59) remaining)"
The ProgressBar class is not driving the visual progress bar yet. It
has just been added into the internal block copy algorithm and generates
debug messages showing the progress bar is operating correctly.
Debugging looks like this:
DEBUG: ProgressBar::start(target=2.0636e+09, text_mode=PROGRESSBAR_TEXT_COPY_BYTES)
DEBUG: ProgressBar::update(progress=1.30023e+08) m_fraction=0.0630081 m_text="124.00 MiB of 1.92 GiB copied"
DEBUG: ProgressBar::update(progress=2.67387e+08) m_fraction=0.129573 m_text="255.00 MiB of 1.92 GiB copied"
DEBUG: ProgressBar::update(progress=4.0475e+08) m_fraction=0.196138 m_text="386.00 MiB of 1.92 GiB copied"
...
DEBUG: ProgressBar::update(progress=1.13351e+09) m_fraction=0.549289 m_text="1.06 GiB of 1.92 GiB copied (00:00:04 remaining)"
DEBUG: ProgressBar::update(progress=1.26249e+09) m_fraction=0.611789 m_text="1.18 GiB of 1.92 GiB copied (00:00:04 remaining)"
DEBUG: ProgressBar::update(progress=1.39041e+09) m_fraction=0.67378 m_text="1.29 GiB of 1.92 GiB copied (00:00:03 remaining)"
...
DEBUG: ProgressBar::update(progress=1.97552e+09) m_fraction=0.957317 m_text="1.84 GiB of 1.92 GiB copied (00:00:00 remaining)"
DEBUG: ProgressBar::update(progress=2.0636e+09) m_fraction=1 m_text="1.92 GiB of 1.92 GiB copied"
DEBUG: ProgressBar::stop()
Bug 760709 - Add progress bars to XFS and EXT2/3/4 file system specific
copy methods
This is part of parent bug:
Bug #721455 - Obsolete info in license text on multiple modules
and GNOME Goal:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/Proposals
* verify all source files to make sure they have a license and a
copyright, and that both are up-to-date
Bug #721565 - License text contains obsolete FSF postal address
The read-only functionality is unused and the readonly parameter is
always false in copy_filesystem() and copy_blocks() methods. This has
been the case since the copy simulation was dropped by commit:
b9b4b2e55d
Remove simulation pass ( read test ) on move
Include guards need to be unique within GParted code and all included
library header files.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Include_guard#Difficulties
Use this model for all include guards:
#ifndef GPARTED_FILE_NAME_H
#define GPARTED_FILE_NAME_H
...
#endif /* GPARTED_FILE_NAME_H */
Closes Bug #539297 - Make include guards unique
The glibmm GSource wrappers have a bug where they do not do
reference counting properly, and have a race condition where
the background thread can try to touch the source after the
main thread has already processed and destroyed it. This
results in writes to freed memory and sometimes this causes
crashes or other erratic behavior. Avoid using the glibmm
wrappers and use glib directly. See bug #561885 for details
of the glibmm bug.
Bug #697727 - Segfault in livecd Gparted v 0.15.0-3 when copying partition
Interested operations can now connect a signal to their OperationDetail
to be notified of a cancelation request. The internal copy/move code
will now cleanly stop on cancelation, allowing the partition to be
rolled back to its previous state. This makes canceling a move
perfectly safe.
After clicking cancel, the button changes to "Force Cancel" and is
disabled for 5 seconds. Operations that are safe to cancel will do so
and those that are not will continue to run. Clicking force cancel
asks operations to cancel, even if doing so is unsafe. For the
internal copy/move algorithm, canceling is always safe because an
error results in a rollback operation. Canceling the rollback is
unsafe. For external commands, filesystem modules may indicate
that the command is safe to cancel or not. Canceled commands will
be terminated with SIGINT.
As a result of the new safe cancel vs force cancel distinction, the
scary warning about cancl causing corruption has been moved to
after clicking the force cancel button.
Part of Bug #601239 - Please allow 'Cancel after current operation'
Have the copy code create a background thread to do the actual copying so
that it won't block the main loop.
Part of Bug 685740 - Refactor to use asynchronous command execution
Mike Fleetwood