Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mike Fleetwood b7c9b3e5a6 Add support for updating the exFAT UUID (!67)
Also with exfatprogs 1.1.0 [1], tune.exfat and exfatlabel gained the
capability to report and set the exFAT Volume Serial Number [2][3][4].
This is what blkid and therefore GParted reports as the UUID.

Report serial number:

    # tune.exfat -i /dev/sdb1
    exfatprogs version : 1.1.0
    volume serial : 0x772ffe5d
    # echo $?
    0

    # blkid /dev/sdb1
    /dev/sdb1: LABEL="test exfat" UUID="772F-FE5D" TYPE="exfat" PTTYPE="dos"

Set serial number:

    # tune.exfat -I 0xf96ef190 /dev/sdb1
    exfatprogs version : 1.1.0
    New volume serial : 0xf96ef190
    # echo $?
    0

tune.exfat exists in earlier releases of exfatprogs so check it has the
capability by searching for "Set volume serial" in the help output
before enabling this capability.

    # tune.exfat
    exfatprogs version : 1.1.0
    Usage: tune.exfat
            -l | --print-label                    Print volume label
            -L | --set-label=label                Set volume label
            -i | --print-serial                   Print volume serial
            -L | --set-serial=value               Set volume serial
            -V | --version                        Show version
            -v | --verbose                        Print debug
            -h | --help                           Show help

(Note the cut and paste error reporting the set volume serial flag as
'-L' rather than actually '-S').

[1] exfatprogs-1.1.0 version released
    http://github.com/exfaoprogs/exfatprogs/releases/tag/1.1.0

[2] [tools][feature request] Allow To Change Volume Serial Number ("ID")
    #138
    https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/issues/138

[3] exfatlabel:add get/set volume serial option
    b4d9c9eeb5

[4] exFAT file system specification, 3.1.11 VolumeSerialNumber Field
    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/exfat-specification#3111-volumeserialnumber-field

Closes !67 - Add support for reading exFAT usage and updating the UUID
2021-02-17 17:16:48 +00:00
Mike Fleetwood 57507e21e2 Add exFAT file system usage reporting (!67)
exfatprogs 1.1.0 released 2021-02-09 [1] has gained support for
reporting file system usage [2][3] so add that capability to GParted.
It works like this:

    # dump.exfat /dev/sdb1 | egrep 'Volume Length\(sectors\):|Sector Size Bits:|Sector per Cluster bits:|Free Clusters:'
    Volume Length(sectors):                 524288
    Sector Size Bits:                       9
    Sector per Cluster bits:                3
    Free Clusters:                          23585

Unfortunately dump.exfat returns a non-zero status on success so that
can't be used to check for failure:

    # dump.exfat /dev/sdb1
    exfatprogs version : 1.1.0
    -------------- Dump Boot sector region --------------
    Volume Length(sectors):                 524288
    ...
    # echo $?
    192

dump.exfat only writes errors to stderr, so use this to identify failure:

    # dump.exfat /dev/sdb1 1> /dev/null
    # echo $?
    192

    # dump.exfat /dev/zero 1> /dev/null
    invalid block device size(/dev/zero)
    bogus sector size bits : 0
    # echo $?
    234

[1] exfatprogs-1.1.0 version released
    http://github.com/exfaoprogs/exfatprogs/releases/tag/1.1.0

[2] [feature request] File system usage reporting
    https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/issues/139

[3] exfatprogs: add dump.exfat
    7ce9b2336b

Closes !67 - Add support for reading exFAT usage and updating the UUID
2021-02-17 17:16:48 +00:00
Mike Fleetwood bd386f445d Add exFAT support (!30)
With exfatprogs (https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs) installed the
following operations on exFAT file systems are supported:
- Creation
- Checking
- Labelling
As of the current exfatprogs 1.0.4 the following are not supported:
- Reading usage
- Resizing
- Updating the UUID

Closes !30 - Add exFAT support
2021-01-15 19:55:17 +00:00
Mike Fleetwood 8979913a3f Remove "../include/" from GParted header #includes
It made the code look a little messy, is easily resolved in the build
system and made the dependencies more complicated than needed.  Each
GParted header was tracked via multiple different names (different
numbers of "../include/" prefixes).  For example just looking at how
DialogFeatures.o depends on Utils.h:

    $ cd src
    $ make DialogFeatures.o
    $ egrep ' [^ ]*Utils.h' .deps/DialogFeatures.Po
     ../include/DialogFeatures.h ../include/../include/Utils.h \
     ../include/../include/../include/../include/../include/../include/Utils.h \
     ../include/../include/../include/Utils.h \

After removing "../include/" from the GParted header #includes, just
need to add "-I../include" to the compile command via the AM_CPPFLAGS in
src/Makefile.am.  Now the dependencies on GParted header files are
tracked under a single name (with a single "../include/" prefix).  Now
DialogFeatures.o only depends on a single name to Utils.h:

    $ make DialogFeatures.o
    $ egrep ' [^ ]*Utils.h' .deps/DialogFeatures.Po
     ../include/DialogFeatures.h ../include/Utils.h ../include/i18n.h \
2016-12-12 13:15:34 -07:00
Daniel Mustieles 3861b9257b Replace obsolete FSF postal address in copyright notices (#721565)
This is part of parent bug:
    Bug #721455 - Obsolete info in license text on multiple modules

and GNOME Goal:
    https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/Proposals

    * verify all source files to make sure they have a license and a
      copyright, and that both are up-to-date

Bug #721565 -  License text contains obsolete FSF postal address
2014-01-26 10:53:23 +00:00
Mike Fleetwood 2b51d87147 Make include guards unique (#539297)
Include guards need to be unique within GParted code and all included
library header files.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Include_guard#Difficulties

Use this model for all include guards:
    #ifndef GPARTED_FILE_NAME_H
    #define GPARTED_FILE_NAME_H
    ...
    #endif /* GPARTED_FILE_NAME_H */

Closes Bug #539297 - Make include guards unique
2013-06-05 10:57:39 -06:00
Phillip Susi e4210ba08d Cleanup duplicate fs code
Many filesystems do not implement some of their methods, but had to provide
dummy implementations.  Remove all of the dummy implementations and instead
just provide one in the base FileSystem class.
2013-03-11 18:40:31 -06:00
Mike Fleetwood 795a92f5b2 Add file system specific remove() methods (#670171)
This commit only adds a remove() method to every file system and an
optional call to it in the relevant operations.  All remove() methods
are no operations and not enabled.

The remove() method provides explicit controlled removal of a file
system before the partition is deleted or overwritten by being formatted
or pasted into.  When implemented, it appears as an extra step in the
relevant operation.  The file system specific remove() method is
explicitly allowed to fail and stop the operations currently being
applied.

This is different to the existing erase_filesystem_signatures() which
wipes any previous file system signatures immediately before a new file
system is written to ensure there is no possibility of the partition
containing two or more different file system signatures.  It never fails
or reports anything to the user.

NOTE:
Most file systems should NOT implement a remove() method as it will
prevent recovery from accidental partition deletion.

Bug #670171 - Add LVM PV read-write support
2012-08-30 13:47:45 -06:00
Rogier Goossens 9e96159bb2 Add support for setting UUID (#667278)
Add the ability to set a new random UUID on file systems that provide
the appropriate tools to perform this action.

Update the help manual to include this new functionality.  Also add
reference links to "setting a partition label" and "changing a
partition UUID" in the "copying and pasting a partition" section.

This patch does not include setting the UUID on an NTFS file system.

Bug #667278 - Add support for setting UUID

Bug #608308 - fix documentation - Copying and Pasting a Partition
2012-01-23 12:32:27 -07:00
Curtis Gedak 7cbc125a2e Add detection of exfat file systems (#639760)
Note that util-linux v2.18 or higher is required to detect exfat file
systems.

Part of Bug #639760 - exfat / fat64 support
2011-10-22 11:54:54 -06:00