This was still using the old transaction creation algorithm,
coupled with a deterministic output selection scheme, which
made it ill suited to the job, since it'd loop indefinitely
in case the fee increased between the test tx and adding the
fee.
714ee99 Fix description for locked_transfer (Oyvind Kvanes)
71538f3 Rename to lockblocks and add max value (Oyvind Kvanes)
68ac060 Fix locked_transfer (Oyvind Kvanes)
7d020bd Add locked_transfer (Oyvind Kvanes)
d5f918a Revert transfer_main in simplewallet (Oyvind Kvanes)
3451963 Add motifications to test out locked_transfer (Oyvind Kvanes)
e5e6d88 Add more information to transaction in wallet (Oyvind Kvanes)
9b8a062 Make a small test change (Oyvind Kvanes)
10be903 Brackets to prevent premature return (NanoAkron)
fb1785a Brackets to ensure doesn't function prematurely return (NanoAkron)
8ed0d72 Moved logging to target functions rather than caller (NanoAkron)
442bfd1 Added messages at log level 2 to reflect deactivation procedure (NanoAkron)
8b20cbf libwallet_api: do not use fast-refresh on recovery (Ilya Kitaev)
10fe626 libwallet_api: fast-refresh in case of opening non-synced wallet (Ilya Kitaev)
0019e31 libwallet_api: fix unhandled exception on address check (Ilya Kitaev)
1f73f80 libwallet_api: fast-refresh for new wallet (Ilya Kitaev)
4789347 libwallet_api: test for create/init wallet on mainnet (Ilya Kitaev)
bba6af9 wallet: cold wallet transaction signing (moneromooo-monero)
9872dcb wallet: fix log confusion between bytes and kilobytes (moneromooo-monero)
d9b0bf9 cryptonote_core: make extra field removal more generic (moneromooo-monero)
98f19d4 serialization: add support for serializing std::pair and std::list (moneromooo-monero)
Changed the wording from "from 0 to maximum available" to "from 2 to maximum available".
May I also suggest putting in a number rather than "maximum available" and also clarifying that mixin = 0 is still allowed if the user has unmixable outputs (dust), which he wants to "undust" using sweep_unmixable (comment from dEBRUYNE-1 ).
Changed the wording from "from 0 to maximum available" to "from 2 to maximum available".
May I also suggest putting in a number rather than "maximum available" and also clarifying that mixin = 0 is still allowed if the user has unmixable outputs (dust), which he wants to "undust" using sweep_unmixable (comment from dEBRUYNE-1 ).
Riccardo Spagni