synapse-old/synapse/storage/databases/main/user_directory.py

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

925 lines
34 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
# Copyright 2017 Vector Creations Ltd
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
2018-07-09 00:09:20 -06:00
import logging
import re
from typing import (
TYPE_CHECKING,
Dict,
Iterable,
List,
Optional,
Sequence,
Set,
Tuple,
cast,
)
from typing_extensions import TypedDict
from synapse.api.errors import StoreError
from synapse.util.stringutils import non_null_str_or_none
if TYPE_CHECKING:
from synapse.server import HomeServer
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes, HistoryVisibility, JoinRules
from synapse.storage.database import (
DatabasePool,
LoggingDatabaseConnection,
LoggingTransaction,
)
from synapse.storage.databases.main.state import StateFilter
from synapse.storage.databases.main.state_deltas import StateDeltasStore
2019-03-11 07:39:12 -06:00
from synapse.storage.engines import PostgresEngine, Sqlite3Engine
from synapse.types import (
JsonDict,
UserProfile,
get_domain_from_id,
get_localpart_from_id,
)
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
from synapse.util.caches.descriptors import cached
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
TEMP_TABLE = "_temp_populate_user_directory"
class UserDirectoryBackgroundUpdateStore(StateDeltasStore):
# How many records do we calculate before sending it to
# add_users_who_share_private_rooms?
SHARE_PRIVATE_WORKING_SET = 500
def __init__(
self,
database: DatabasePool,
db_conn: LoggingDatabaseConnection,
hs: "HomeServer",
) -> None:
super().__init__(database, db_conn, hs)
self.server_name: str = hs.hostname
self.db_pool.updates.register_background_update_handler(
"populate_user_directory_createtables",
self._populate_user_directory_createtables,
)
self.db_pool.updates.register_background_update_handler(
"populate_user_directory_process_rooms",
self._populate_user_directory_process_rooms,
)
self.db_pool.updates.register_background_update_handler(
"populate_user_directory_process_users",
self._populate_user_directory_process_users,
)
self.db_pool.updates.register_background_update_handler(
"populate_user_directory_cleanup", self._populate_user_directory_cleanup
)
async def _populate_user_directory_createtables(
self, progress: JsonDict, batch_size: int
) -> int:
# Get all the rooms that we want to process.
def _make_staging_area(txn: LoggingTransaction) -> None:
sql = (
"CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS "
+ TEMP_TABLE
+ "_rooms(room_id TEXT NOT NULL, events BIGINT NOT NULL)"
)
txn.execute(sql)
sql = (
"CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS "
+ TEMP_TABLE
+ "_position(position TEXT NOT NULL)"
)
txn.execute(sql)
# Get rooms we want to process from the database
sql = """
SELECT room_id, count(*) FROM current_state_events
GROUP BY room_id
"""
txn.execute(sql)
rooms = list(txn.fetchall())
self.db_pool.simple_insert_many_txn(
txn, TEMP_TABLE + "_rooms", keys=("room_id", "events"), values=rooms
)
del rooms
sql = (
"CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS "
+ TEMP_TABLE
+ "_users(user_id TEXT NOT NULL)"
)
txn.execute(sql)
txn.execute("SELECT name FROM users")
users = list(txn.fetchall())
self.db_pool.simple_insert_many_txn(
txn, TEMP_TABLE + "_users", keys=("user_id",), values=users
)
new_pos = await self.get_max_stream_id_in_current_state_deltas()
await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"populate_user_directory_temp_build", _make_staging_area
)
await self.db_pool.simple_insert(
TEMP_TABLE + "_position", {"position": new_pos}
)
await self.db_pool.updates._end_background_update(
"populate_user_directory_createtables"
)
return 1
async def _populate_user_directory_cleanup(
self,
progress: JsonDict,
batch_size: int,
) -> int:
"""
Update the user directory stream position, then clean up the old tables.
"""
position = await self.db_pool.simple_select_one_onecol(
TEMP_TABLE + "_position", {}, "position"
)
await self.update_user_directory_stream_pos(position)
def _delete_staging_area(txn: LoggingTransaction) -> None:
txn.execute("DROP TABLE IF EXISTS " + TEMP_TABLE + "_rooms")
txn.execute("DROP TABLE IF EXISTS " + TEMP_TABLE + "_users")
txn.execute("DROP TABLE IF EXISTS " + TEMP_TABLE + "_position")
await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"populate_user_directory_cleanup", _delete_staging_area
)
await self.db_pool.updates._end_background_update(
"populate_user_directory_cleanup"
)
return 1
async def _populate_user_directory_process_rooms(
self, progress: JsonDict, batch_size: int
) -> int:
"""
Rescan the state of all rooms so we can track
- who's in a public room;
- which local users share a private room with other users (local
and remote); and
- who should be in the user_directory.
Args:
progress (dict)
batch_size (int): Maximum number of state events to process
per cycle.
Returns:
number of events processed.
"""
# If we don't have progress filed, delete everything.
if not progress:
await self.delete_all_from_user_dir()
def _get_next_batch(
txn: LoggingTransaction,
) -> Optional[Sequence[Tuple[str, int]]]:
# Only fetch 250 rooms, so we don't fetch too many at once, even
# if those 250 rooms have less than batch_size state events.
sql = """
SELECT room_id, events FROM %s
ORDER BY events DESC
LIMIT 250
""" % (
TEMP_TABLE + "_rooms",
)
txn.execute(sql)
rooms_to_work_on = cast(List[Tuple[str, int]], txn.fetchall())
if not rooms_to_work_on:
return None
# Get how many are left to process, so we can give status on how
# far we are in processing
txn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM " + TEMP_TABLE + "_rooms")
result = txn.fetchone()
assert result is not None
progress["remaining"] = result[0]
return rooms_to_work_on
rooms_to_work_on = await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"populate_user_directory_temp_read", _get_next_batch
)
# No more rooms -- complete the transaction.
if not rooms_to_work_on:
await self.db_pool.updates._end_background_update(
"populate_user_directory_process_rooms"
)
return 1
logger.debug(
"Processing the next %d rooms of %d remaining"
% (len(rooms_to_work_on), progress["remaining"])
)
processed_event_count = 0
for room_id, event_count in rooms_to_work_on:
is_in_room = await self.is_host_joined(room_id, self.server_name) # type: ignore[attr-defined]
if is_in_room:
users_with_profile = await self.get_users_in_room_with_profiles(room_id) # type: ignore[attr-defined]
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
# Throw away users excluded from the directory.
users_with_profile = {
user_id: profile
for user_id, profile in users_with_profile.items()
if not self.hs.is_mine_id(user_id)
or await self.should_include_local_user_in_dir(user_id)
}
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
# Upsert a user_directory record for each remote user we see.
for user_id, profile in users_with_profile.items():
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
# Local users are processed separately in
# `_populate_user_directory_users`; there we can read from
# the `profiles` table to ensure we don't leak their per-room
# profiles. It also means we write local users to this table
# exactly once, rather than once for every room they're in.
if self.hs.is_mine_id(user_id):
continue
# TODO `users_with_profile` above reads from the `user_directory`
# table, meaning that `profile` is bespoke to this room.
# and this leaks remote users' per-room profiles to the user directory.
await self.update_profile_in_user_dir(
user_id, profile.display_name, profile.avatar_url
)
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
# Now update the room sharing tables to include this room.
is_public = await self.is_room_world_readable_or_publicly_joinable(
room_id
)
if is_public:
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
if users_with_profile:
await self.add_users_in_public_rooms(
room_id, users_with_profile.keys()
)
else:
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
to_insert = set()
for user_id in users_with_profile:
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
# We want the set of pairs (L, M) where L and M are
# in `users_with_profile` and L is local.
# Do so by looking for the local user L first.
if not self.hs.is_mine_id(user_id):
continue
for other_user_id in users_with_profile:
if user_id == other_user_id:
continue
user_set = (user_id, other_user_id)
to_insert.add(user_set)
# If it gets too big, stop and write to the database
# to prevent storing too much in RAM.
if len(to_insert) >= self.SHARE_PRIVATE_WORKING_SET:
await self.add_users_who_share_private_room(
room_id, to_insert
)
to_insert.clear()
if to_insert:
await self.add_users_who_share_private_room(room_id, to_insert)
to_insert.clear()
# We've finished a room. Delete it from the table.
await self.db_pool.simple_delete_one(
TEMP_TABLE + "_rooms", {"room_id": room_id}
)
# Update the remaining counter.
progress["remaining"] -= 1
await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"populate_user_directory",
self.db_pool.updates._background_update_progress_txn,
"populate_user_directory_process_rooms",
progress,
)
processed_event_count += event_count
if processed_event_count > batch_size:
# Don't process any more rooms, we've hit our batch size.
return processed_event_count
return processed_event_count
async def _populate_user_directory_process_users(
self, progress: JsonDict, batch_size: int
) -> int:
"""
Add all local users to the user directory.
"""
def _get_next_batch(txn: LoggingTransaction) -> Optional[List[str]]:
sql = "SELECT user_id FROM %s LIMIT %s" % (
TEMP_TABLE + "_users",
str(batch_size),
)
txn.execute(sql)
user_result = cast(List[Tuple[str]], txn.fetchall())
if not user_result:
return None
users_to_work_on = [x[0] for x in user_result]
# Get how many are left to process, so we can give status on how
# far we are in processing
sql = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM " + TEMP_TABLE + "_users"
txn.execute(sql)
count_result = txn.fetchone()
assert count_result is not None
progress["remaining"] = count_result[0]
return users_to_work_on
users_to_work_on = await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"populate_user_directory_temp_read", _get_next_batch
)
# No more users -- complete the transaction.
if not users_to_work_on:
await self.db_pool.updates._end_background_update(
"populate_user_directory_process_users"
)
return 1
logger.debug(
"Processing the next %d users of %d remaining"
% (len(users_to_work_on), progress["remaining"])
)
for user_id in users_to_work_on:
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
if await self.should_include_local_user_in_dir(user_id):
profile = await self.get_profileinfo(get_localpart_from_id(user_id)) # type: ignore[attr-defined]
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
await self.update_profile_in_user_dir(
user_id, profile.display_name, profile.avatar_url
)
# We've finished processing a user. Delete it from the table.
await self.db_pool.simple_delete_one(
TEMP_TABLE + "_users", {"user_id": user_id}
)
# Update the remaining counter.
progress["remaining"] -= 1
await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"populate_user_directory",
self.db_pool.updates._background_update_progress_txn,
"populate_user_directory_process_users",
progress,
)
return len(users_to_work_on)
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
async def should_include_local_user_in_dir(self, user: str) -> bool:
"""Certain classes of local user are omitted from the user directory.
Is this user one of them?
"""
# We're opting to exclude the appservice sender (user defined by the
# `sender_localpart` in the appservice registration) even though
# technically it could be DM-able. In the future, this could potentially
# be configurable per-appservice whether the appservice sender can be
# contacted.
if self.get_app_service_by_user_id(user) is not None: # type: ignore[attr-defined]
return False
# We're opting to exclude appservice users (anyone matching the user
# namespace regex in the appservice registration) even though technically
# they could be DM-able. In the future, this could potentially
# be configurable per-appservice whether the appservice users can be
# contacted.
if self.get_if_app_services_interested_in_user(user): # type: ignore[attr-defined]
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
# TODO we might want to make this configurable for each app service
return False
# Support users are for diagnostics and should not appear in the user directory.
if await self.is_support_user(user): # type: ignore[attr-defined]
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
return False
# Deactivated users aren't contactable, so should not appear in the user directory.
try:
if await self.get_user_deactivated_status(user): # type: ignore[attr-defined]
return False
except StoreError:
# No such user in the users table. No need to do this when calling
# is_support_user---that returns False if the user is missing.
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
return False
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
return True
async def is_room_world_readable_or_publicly_joinable(self, room_id: str) -> bool:
2017-05-31 08:00:29 -06:00
"""Check if the room is either world_readable or publically joinable"""
# Create a state filter that only queries join and history state event
types_to_filter = (
(EventTypes.JoinRules, ""),
(EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, ""),
)
# Getting the partial state is fine, as we're not looking at membership
# events.
current_state_ids = await self.get_partial_filtered_current_state_ids( # type: ignore[attr-defined]
room_id, StateFilter.from_types(types_to_filter)
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
)
join_rules_id = current_state_ids.get((EventTypes.JoinRules, ""))
if join_rules_id:
join_rule_ev = await self.get_event(join_rules_id, allow_none=True) # type: ignore[attr-defined]
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
if join_rule_ev:
if join_rule_ev.content.get("join_rule") == JoinRules.PUBLIC:
return True
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
hist_vis_id = current_state_ids.get((EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, ""))
if hist_vis_id:
hist_vis_ev = await self.get_event(hist_vis_id, allow_none=True) # type: ignore[attr-defined]
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
if hist_vis_ev:
if (
hist_vis_ev.content.get("history_visibility")
== HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE
):
return True
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
return False
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
async def update_profile_in_user_dir(
self, user_id: str, display_name: Optional[str], avatar_url: Optional[str]
) -> None:
"""
Update or add a user's profile in the user directory.
2017-05-31 08:00:29 -06:00
"""
# If the display name or avatar URL are unexpected types, replace with None.
display_name = non_null_str_or_none(display_name)
avatar_url = non_null_str_or_none(avatar_url)
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
def _update_profile_in_user_dir_txn(txn: LoggingTransaction) -> None:
self.db_pool.simple_upsert_txn(
txn,
table="user_directory",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
values={"display_name": display_name, "avatar_url": avatar_url},
lock=False, # We're only inserter
)
if isinstance(self.database_engine, PostgresEngine):
2017-11-29 11:27:05 -07:00
# We weight the localpart most highly, then display name and finally
# server name
sql = """
INSERT INTO user_directory_search(user_id, vector)
VALUES (?,
setweight(to_tsvector('simple', ?), 'A')
|| setweight(to_tsvector('simple', ?), 'D')
|| setweight(to_tsvector('simple', COALESCE(?, '')), 'B')
) ON CONFLICT (user_id) DO UPDATE SET vector=EXCLUDED.vector
"""
txn.execute(
sql,
(
user_id,
get_localpart_from_id(user_id),
get_domain_from_id(user_id),
display_name,
),
)
elif isinstance(self.database_engine, Sqlite3Engine):
value = "%s %s" % (user_id, display_name) if display_name else user_id
self.db_pool.simple_upsert_txn(
txn,
table="user_directory_search",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
values={"value": value},
lock=False, # We're only inserter
)
else:
# This should be unreachable.
raise Exception("Unrecognized database engine")
txn.call_after(self.get_user_in_directory.invalidate, (user_id,))
await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"update_profile_in_user_dir", _update_profile_in_user_dir_txn
)
2017-06-01 07:50:46 -06:00
async def add_users_who_share_private_room(
self, room_id: str, user_id_tuples: Iterable[Tuple[str, str]]
) -> None:
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
"""Insert entries into the users_who_share_private_rooms table. The first
user should be a local user.
Args:
room_id
user_id_tuples: iterable of 2-tuple of user IDs.
"""
Use autocommit mode for single statement DB functions. (#8542) Autocommit means that we don't wrap the functions in transactions, and instead get executed directly. Introduced in #8456. This will help: 1. reduce the number of `could not serialize access due to concurrent delete` errors that we see (though there are a few functions that often cause serialization errors that we don't fix here); 2. improve the DB performance, as it no longer needs to deal with the overhead of `REPEATABLE READ` isolation levels; and 3. improve wall clock speed of these functions, as we no longer need to send `BEGIN` and `COMMIT` to the DB. Some notes about the differences between autocommit mode and our default `REPEATABLE READ` transactions: 1. Currently `autocommit` only applies when using PostgreSQL, and is ignored when using SQLite (due to silliness with [Twisted DB classes](https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/9998)). 2. Autocommit functions may get retried on error, which means they can get applied *twice* (or more) to the DB (since they are not in a transaction the previous call would not get rolled back). This means that the functions need to be idempotent (or otherwise not care about being called multiple times). Read queries, simple deletes, and updates/upserts that replace rows (rather than generating new values from existing rows) are all idempotent. 3. Autocommit functions no longer get executed in [`REPEATABLE READ`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/transaction-iso.html) isolation level, and so data can change queries, which is fine for single statement queries.
2020-10-14 08:50:59 -06:00
await self.db_pool.simple_upsert_many(
table="users_who_share_private_rooms",
key_names=["user_id", "other_user_id", "room_id"],
key_values=[
(user_id, other_user_id, room_id)
for user_id, other_user_id in user_id_tuples
],
value_names=(),
value_values=(),
Use autocommit mode for single statement DB functions. (#8542) Autocommit means that we don't wrap the functions in transactions, and instead get executed directly. Introduced in #8456. This will help: 1. reduce the number of `could not serialize access due to concurrent delete` errors that we see (though there are a few functions that often cause serialization errors that we don't fix here); 2. improve the DB performance, as it no longer needs to deal with the overhead of `REPEATABLE READ` isolation levels; and 3. improve wall clock speed of these functions, as we no longer need to send `BEGIN` and `COMMIT` to the DB. Some notes about the differences between autocommit mode and our default `REPEATABLE READ` transactions: 1. Currently `autocommit` only applies when using PostgreSQL, and is ignored when using SQLite (due to silliness with [Twisted DB classes](https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/9998)). 2. Autocommit functions may get retried on error, which means they can get applied *twice* (or more) to the DB (since they are not in a transaction the previous call would not get rolled back). This means that the functions need to be idempotent (or otherwise not care about being called multiple times). Read queries, simple deletes, and updates/upserts that replace rows (rather than generating new values from existing rows) are all idempotent. 3. Autocommit functions no longer get executed in [`REPEATABLE READ`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/transaction-iso.html) isolation level, and so data can change queries, which is fine for single statement queries.
2020-10-14 08:50:59 -06:00
desc="add_users_who_share_room",
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
)
async def add_users_in_public_rooms(
self, room_id: str, user_ids: Iterable[str]
) -> None:
"""Insert entries into the users_in_public_rooms table.
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
Args:
room_id
user_ids
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
"""
Use autocommit mode for single statement DB functions. (#8542) Autocommit means that we don't wrap the functions in transactions, and instead get executed directly. Introduced in #8456. This will help: 1. reduce the number of `could not serialize access due to concurrent delete` errors that we see (though there are a few functions that often cause serialization errors that we don't fix here); 2. improve the DB performance, as it no longer needs to deal with the overhead of `REPEATABLE READ` isolation levels; and 3. improve wall clock speed of these functions, as we no longer need to send `BEGIN` and `COMMIT` to the DB. Some notes about the differences between autocommit mode and our default `REPEATABLE READ` transactions: 1. Currently `autocommit` only applies when using PostgreSQL, and is ignored when using SQLite (due to silliness with [Twisted DB classes](https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/9998)). 2. Autocommit functions may get retried on error, which means they can get applied *twice* (or more) to the DB (since they are not in a transaction the previous call would not get rolled back). This means that the functions need to be idempotent (or otherwise not care about being called multiple times). Read queries, simple deletes, and updates/upserts that replace rows (rather than generating new values from existing rows) are all idempotent. 3. Autocommit functions no longer get executed in [`REPEATABLE READ`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/transaction-iso.html) isolation level, and so data can change queries, which is fine for single statement queries.
2020-10-14 08:50:59 -06:00
await self.db_pool.simple_upsert_many(
table="users_in_public_rooms",
key_names=["user_id", "room_id"],
key_values=[(user_id, room_id) for user_id in user_ids],
value_names=(),
value_values=(),
Use autocommit mode for single statement DB functions. (#8542) Autocommit means that we don't wrap the functions in transactions, and instead get executed directly. Introduced in #8456. This will help: 1. reduce the number of `could not serialize access due to concurrent delete` errors that we see (though there are a few functions that often cause serialization errors that we don't fix here); 2. improve the DB performance, as it no longer needs to deal with the overhead of `REPEATABLE READ` isolation levels; and 3. improve wall clock speed of these functions, as we no longer need to send `BEGIN` and `COMMIT` to the DB. Some notes about the differences between autocommit mode and our default `REPEATABLE READ` transactions: 1. Currently `autocommit` only applies when using PostgreSQL, and is ignored when using SQLite (due to silliness with [Twisted DB classes](https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/9998)). 2. Autocommit functions may get retried on error, which means they can get applied *twice* (or more) to the DB (since they are not in a transaction the previous call would not get rolled back). This means that the functions need to be idempotent (or otherwise not care about being called multiple times). Read queries, simple deletes, and updates/upserts that replace rows (rather than generating new values from existing rows) are all idempotent. 3. Autocommit functions no longer get executed in [`REPEATABLE READ`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/transaction-iso.html) isolation level, and so data can change queries, which is fine for single statement queries.
2020-10-14 08:50:59 -06:00
desc="add_users_in_public_rooms",
)
async def delete_all_from_user_dir(self) -> None:
"""Delete the entire user directory"""
def _delete_all_from_user_dir_txn(txn: LoggingTransaction) -> None:
txn.execute("DELETE FROM user_directory")
txn.execute("DELETE FROM user_directory_search")
txn.execute("DELETE FROM users_in_public_rooms")
txn.execute("DELETE FROM users_who_share_private_rooms")
txn.call_after(self.get_user_in_directory.invalidate_all)
await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"delete_all_from_user_dir", _delete_all_from_user_dir_txn
)
@cached()
async def get_user_in_directory(self, user_id: str) -> Optional[Dict[str, str]]:
return await self.db_pool.simple_select_one(
table="user_directory",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
retcols=("display_name", "avatar_url"),
allow_none=True,
desc="get_user_in_directory",
)
async def update_user_directory_stream_pos(self, stream_id: Optional[int]) -> None:
await self.db_pool.simple_update_one(
table="user_directory_stream_pos",
keyvalues={},
updatevalues={"stream_id": stream_id},
desc="update_user_directory_stream_pos",
)
class SearchResult(TypedDict):
limited: bool
results: List[UserProfile]
class UserDirectoryStore(UserDirectoryBackgroundUpdateStore):
# How many records do we calculate before sending it to
# add_users_who_share_private_rooms?
SHARE_PRIVATE_WORKING_SET = 500
def __init__(
self,
database: DatabasePool,
db_conn: LoggingDatabaseConnection,
hs: "HomeServer",
) -> None:
super().__init__(database, db_conn, hs)
self._prefer_local_users_in_search = (
hs.config.userdirectory.user_directory_search_prefer_local_users
)
self._server_name = hs.config.server.server_name
async def remove_from_user_dir(self, user_id: str) -> None:
def _remove_from_user_dir_txn(txn: LoggingTransaction) -> None:
self.db_pool.simple_delete_txn(
txn, table="user_directory", keyvalues={"user_id": user_id}
)
self.db_pool.simple_delete_txn(
txn, table="user_directory_search", keyvalues={"user_id": user_id}
)
self.db_pool.simple_delete_txn(
txn, table="users_in_public_rooms", keyvalues={"user_id": user_id}
)
self.db_pool.simple_delete_txn(
txn,
table="users_who_share_private_rooms",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
)
self.db_pool.simple_delete_txn(
txn,
table="users_who_share_private_rooms",
keyvalues={"other_user_id": user_id},
)
txn.call_after(self.get_user_in_directory.invalidate, (user_id,))
await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"remove_from_user_dir", _remove_from_user_dir_txn
)
async def get_users_in_dir_due_to_room(self, room_id: str) -> Set[str]:
"""Get all user_ids that are in the room directory because they're
in the given room_id
"""
user_ids_share_pub = await self.db_pool.simple_select_onecol(
table="users_in_public_rooms",
keyvalues={"room_id": room_id},
retcol="user_id",
desc="get_users_in_dir_due_to_room",
)
user_ids_share_priv = await self.db_pool.simple_select_onecol(
table="users_who_share_private_rooms",
keyvalues={"room_id": room_id},
retcol="other_user_id",
desc="get_users_in_dir_due_to_room",
)
user_ids = set(user_ids_share_pub)
user_ids.update(user_ids_share_priv)
return user_ids
async def remove_user_who_share_room(self, user_id: str, room_id: str) -> None:
"""
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
Deletes entries in the users_who_share_*_rooms table. The first
user should be a local user.
Args:
user_id
room_id
"""
def _remove_user_who_share_room_txn(txn: LoggingTransaction) -> None:
self.db_pool.simple_delete_txn(
txn,
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
table="users_who_share_private_rooms",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id, "room_id": room_id},
)
self.db_pool.simple_delete_txn(
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
txn,
table="users_who_share_private_rooms",
keyvalues={"other_user_id": user_id, "room_id": room_id},
)
self.db_pool.simple_delete_txn(
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
txn,
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
table="users_in_public_rooms",
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id, "room_id": room_id},
)
2019-03-11 04:11:36 -06:00
await self.db_pool.runInteraction(
"remove_user_who_share_room", _remove_user_who_share_room_txn
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
)
async def get_user_dir_rooms_user_is_in(self, user_id: str) -> List[str]:
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
"""
Returns the rooms that a user is in.
Args:
user_id(str): Must be a local user
Returns:
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
list: user_id
"""
rows = await self.db_pool.simple_select_onecol(
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
table="users_who_share_private_rooms",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
retcol="room_id",
desc="get_rooms_user_is_in",
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
)
pub_rows = await self.db_pool.simple_select_onecol(
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
table="users_in_public_rooms",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
2019-03-12 04:47:14 -06:00
retcol="room_id",
desc="get_rooms_user_is_in",
)
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
users = set(pub_rows)
users.update(rows)
return list(users)
async def get_user_directory_stream_pos(self) -> Optional[int]:
"""
Get the stream ID of the user directory stream.
Returns:
The stream token or None if the initial background update hasn't happened yet.
"""
return await self.db_pool.simple_select_one_onecol(
2017-05-31 04:51:01 -06:00
table="user_directory_stream_pos",
keyvalues={},
retcol="stream_id",
desc="get_user_directory_stream_pos",
)
async def search_user_dir(
self, user_id: str, search_term: str, limit: int
) -> SearchResult:
2017-05-31 08:00:29 -06:00
"""Searches for users in directory
Returns:
dict of the form::
{
"limited": <bool>, # whether there were more results or not
"results": [ # Ordered by best match first
{
"user_id": <user_id>,
"display_name": <display_name>,
"avatar_url": <avatar_url>
}
]
}
"""
if self.hs.config.userdirectory.user_directory_search_all_users:
join_args = (user_id,)
where_clause = "user_id != ?"
else:
join_args = (user_id,)
2019-03-12 08:17:51 -06:00
where_clause = """
(
EXISTS (select 1 from users_in_public_rooms WHERE user_id = t.user_id)
OR EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM users_who_share_private_rooms
WHERE user_id = ? AND other_user_id = t.user_id
)
)
"""
# We allow manipulating the ranking algorithm by injecting statements
# based on config options.
additional_ordering_statements = []
ordering_arguments: Tuple[str, ...] = ()
2017-05-31 07:00:01 -06:00
if isinstance(self.database_engine, PostgresEngine):
full_query, exact_query, prefix_query = _parse_query_postgres(search_term)
# If enabled, this config option will rank local users higher than those on
# remote instances.
if self._prefer_local_users_in_search:
# This statement checks whether a given user's user ID contains a server name
# that matches the local server
statement = "* (CASE WHEN user_id LIKE ? THEN 2.0 ELSE 1.0 END)"
additional_ordering_statements.append(statement)
ordering_arguments += ("%:" + self._server_name,)
2017-05-31 11:17:47 -06:00
# We order by rank and then if they have profile info
# The ranking algorithm is hand tweaked for "best" results. Broadly
# the idea is we give a higher weight to exact matches.
# The array of numbers are the weights for the various part of the
# search: (domain, _, display name, localpart)
2017-05-31 07:00:01 -06:00
sql = """
SELECT d.user_id AS user_id, display_name, avatar_url
2019-03-12 08:17:51 -06:00
FROM user_directory_search as t
INNER JOIN user_directory AS d USING (user_id)
WHERE
%(where_clause)s
AND vector @@ to_tsquery('simple', ?)
2017-05-31 11:17:47 -06:00
ORDER BY
2019-03-07 02:22:53 -07:00
(CASE WHEN d.user_id IS NOT NULL THEN 4.0 ELSE 1.0 END)
* (CASE WHEN display_name IS NOT NULL THEN 1.2 ELSE 1.0 END)
* (CASE WHEN avatar_url IS NOT NULL THEN 1.2 ELSE 1.0 END)
* (
3 * ts_rank_cd(
'{0.1, 0.1, 0.9, 1.0}',
vector,
to_tsquery('simple', ?),
8
)
+ ts_rank_cd(
'{0.1, 0.1, 0.9, 1.0}',
vector,
to_tsquery('simple', ?),
8
)
)
%(order_case_statements)s
DESC,
2017-05-31 11:17:47 -06:00
display_name IS NULL,
avatar_url IS NULL
2017-05-31 07:00:01 -06:00
LIMIT ?
""" % {
"where_clause": where_clause,
"order_case_statements": " ".join(additional_ordering_statements),
}
args = (
join_args
+ (full_query, exact_query, prefix_query)
+ ordering_arguments
+ (limit + 1,)
)
2017-05-31 07:00:01 -06:00
elif isinstance(self.database_engine, Sqlite3Engine):
search_query = _parse_query_sqlite(search_term)
# If enabled, this config option will rank local users higher than those on
# remote instances.
if self._prefer_local_users_in_search:
# This statement checks whether a given user's user ID contains a server name
# that matches the local server
#
# Note that we need to include a comma at the end for valid SQL
statement = "user_id LIKE ? DESC,"
additional_ordering_statements.append(statement)
ordering_arguments += ("%:" + self._server_name,)
2017-05-31 07:00:01 -06:00
sql = """
SELECT d.user_id AS user_id, display_name, avatar_url
2019-03-12 08:17:51 -06:00
FROM user_directory_search as t
INNER JOIN user_directory AS d USING (user_id)
WHERE
%(where_clause)s
AND value MATCH ?
2017-05-31 11:17:47 -06:00
ORDER BY
2017-06-01 07:58:48 -06:00
rank(matchinfo(user_directory_search)) DESC,
%(order_statements)s
2017-05-31 11:17:47 -06:00
display_name IS NULL,
avatar_url IS NULL
2017-05-31 07:00:01 -06:00
LIMIT ?
""" % {
"where_clause": where_clause,
"order_statements": " ".join(additional_ordering_statements),
}
args = join_args + (search_query,) + ordering_arguments + (limit + 1,)
2017-05-31 07:00:01 -06:00
else:
# This should be unreachable.
raise Exception("Unrecognized database engine")
results = cast(
List[UserProfile],
await self.db_pool.execute(
"search_user_dir", self.db_pool.cursor_to_dict, sql, *args
),
)
2017-05-31 07:00:01 -06:00
limited = len(results) > limit
return {"limited": limited, "results": results}
2017-05-31 11:07:12 -06:00
def _parse_query_sqlite(search_term: str) -> str:
2017-05-31 11:07:12 -06:00
"""Takes a plain unicode string from the user and converts it into a form
that can be passed to database.
We use this so that we can add prefix matching, which isn't something
that is supported by default.
We specifically add both a prefix and non prefix matching term so that
exact matches get ranked higher.
"""
# Pull out the individual words, discarding any non-word characters.
results = re.findall(r"([\w\-]+)", search_term, re.UNICODE)
return " & ".join("(%s* OR %s)" % (result, result) for result in results)
def _parse_query_postgres(search_term: str) -> Tuple[str, str, str]:
"""Takes a plain unicode string from the user and converts it into a form
that can be passed to database.
We use this so that we can add prefix matching, which isn't something
that is supported by default.
"""
# Pull out the individual words, discarding any non-word characters.
results = re.findall(r"([\w\-]+)", search_term, re.UNICODE)
both = " & ".join("(%s:* | %s)" % (result, result) for result in results)
exact = " & ".join("%s" % (result,) for result in results)
prefix = " & ".join("%s:*" % (result,) for result in results)
2017-05-31 11:07:12 -06:00
return both, exact, prefix