Fleshed out login spec.

This commit is contained in:
Kegan Dougal 2014-08-28 14:49:15 +01:00
parent 7acede1e42
commit 52cfdfd5f1
1 changed files with 175 additions and 169 deletions

View File

@ -201,124 +201,133 @@ Clients must register with a home server in order to use Matrix. After
registering, the client will be given an access token which must be used in ALL
requests to that home server as a query parameter 'access_token'.
- TODO Kegan : Make registration like login
- TODO Kegan : Make registration like login (just omit the "user" key on the
initial request?)
- TODO Kegan : Allow alternative forms of login (>1 route)
If the client has already registered, they need to be able to login to their
account. The home server may provide many different ways of logging in, such
as user/password auth, login via a social network (OAuth), login by confirming
as user/password auth, login via a social network (OAuth2), login by confirming
a token sent to their email address, etc. This specification does not define how
home servers should authorise their users who want to login to their existing
accounts, but instead defines the standard interface which implementations
should follow so that ANY client can login to ANY home server.
The login process breaks down into the following:
1. Get login process info.
1. Determine the requirements for logging in.
2. Submit the login stage credentials.
3. Get access token or be told the next stage in the login process and repeat
3. Get credentials or be told the next stage in the login process and repeat
step 2.
- What are types?
As each home server may have different ways of logging in, the client needs to know how
they should login. All distinct login stages MUST have a corresponding ``'type'``.
A ``'type'`` is a namespaced string which details the mechanism for logging in.
Matrix-defined login types
--------------------------
A client may be able to login via multiple valid login flows, and should choose a single
flow when logging in. A flow is a series of login stages. The home server MUST respond
with all the valid login flows when requested::
The client can login via 3 paths: 1a and 1b, 2a and 2b, or 3. The client should
select one of these paths.
[
{
"type": "<login type1a>",
"stages": [ "<login type 1a>", "<login type 1b>" ]
},
{
"type": "<login type2a>",
"stages": [ "<login type 2a>", "<login type 2b>" ]
},
{
"type": "<login type3>"
}
]
After the login is completed, the client's fully-qualified user ID and a new access
token MUST be returned::
{
"user_id": "@user:matrix.org",
"access_token": "abcdef0123456789"
}
The ``user_id`` key is particularly useful if the home server wishes to support
localpart entry of usernames (e.g. "user" rather than "@user:matrix.org"), as the
client may not be able to determine its ``user_id`` in this case.
If a login has multiple requests, the home server may wish to create a session. If
a home server responds with a 'session' key to a request, clients MUST submit it in
subsequent requests until the login is completed::
{
"session": "<session id>"
}
This specification defines the following login types:
- m.login.password
- m.login.oauth2
- m.login.email.code
- m.login.email.url
Password-based
--------------
Type: "m.login.password"
LoginSubmission::
Type:
"m.login.password"
Description:
Login is supported via a username and password.
To respond to this type, reply with::
{
"type": "m.login.password",
"user": <user_id>,
"password": <password>
"user": "<user_id or user localpart>",
"password": "<password>"
}
Example:
Assume you are @bob:matrix.org and you wish to login on another mobile device.
First, you GET /login which returns::
{
"type": "m.login.password"
}
Your client knows how to handle this, so your client prompts the user to enter
their username and password. This is then submitted::
{
"type": "m.login.password",
"user": "@bob:matrix.org",
"password": "monkey"
}
The server checks this, finds it is valid, and returns::
{
"access_token": "abcdef0123456789"
}
The server may optionally return "user_id" to confirm or change the user's ID.
This is particularly useful if the home server wishes to support localpart entry
of usernames (e.g. "bob" rather than "@bob:matrix.org").
The home server MUST respond with either new credentials, the next stage of the login
process, or a standard error response.
OAuth2-based
------------
Type: "m.login.oauth2"
This is a multi-stage login.
Type:
"m.login.oauth2"
Description:
Login is supported via OAuth2 URLs. This login consists of multiple requests.
LoginSubmission::
To respond to this type, reply with::
{
"type": "m.login.oauth2",
"user": <user_id>
"user": "<user_id or user localpart>"
}
Returns::
The server MUST respond with::
{
"uri": <Authorization Request uri OR service selection uri>
"uri": <Authorization Request URI OR service selection URI>
}
The home server acts as a 'confidential' Client for the purposes of OAuth2.
If the uri is a "sevice selection uri", it is a simple page which prompts the
user to choose which service to authorize with. On selection of a service, they
link through to Authorization Request URIs. If there is only 1 service which the
The home server acts as a 'confidential' client for the purposes of OAuth2.
If the uri is a ``sevice selection URI``, it MUST point to a webpage which prompts the
user to choose which service to authorize with. On selection of a service, this
MUST link through to an ``Authorization Request URI``. If there is only 1 service which the
home server accepts when logging in, this indirection can be skipped and the
"uri" key can be the Authorization Request URI.
"uri" key can be the ``Authorization Request URI``.
The client visits the Authorization Request URI, which then shows the OAuth2
Allow/Deny prompt. Hitting 'Allow' returns the redirect URI with the auth code.
Home servers can choose any path for the redirect URI. The client should visit
the redirect URI, which will then finish the OAuth2 login process, granting the
The client then visits the ``Authorization Request URI``, which then shows the OAuth2
Allow/Deny prompt. Hitting 'Allow' returns the ``redirect URI`` with the auth code.
Home servers can choose any path for the ``redirect URI``. The client should visit
the ``redirect URI``, which will then finish the OAuth2 login process, granting the
home server an access token for the chosen service. When the home server gets
this access token, it knows that the cilent has authed with the 3rd party, and
so can return a LoginResult.
this access token, it verifies that the cilent has authorised with the 3rd party, and
can now complete the login. The OAuth2 ``redirect URI`` (with auth code) MUST respond
with either new credentials, the next stage of the login process, or a standard error
response.
The OAuth redirect URI (with auth code) MUST return a LoginResult.
Example:
Assume you are @bob:matrix.org and you wish to login on another mobile device.
First, you GET /login which returns::
{
"type": "m.login.oauth2"
}
Your client knows how to handle this, so your client prompts the user to enter
their username. This is then submitted::
{
"type": "m.login.oauth2",
"user": "@bob:matrix.org"
}
The server only accepts auth from Google, so returns the Authorization Request
URI for Google::
For example, if a home server accepts OAuth2 from Google, it would return the
Authorization Request URI for Google::
{
"uri": "https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?response_type=code&
@ -329,145 +338,142 @@ The client then visits this URI and authorizes the home server. The client then
visits the REDIRECT_URI with the auth code= query parameter which returns::
{
"user_id": "@user:matrix.org",
"access_token": "0123456789abcdef"
}
Email-based (code)
------------------
Type: "m.login.email.code"
This is a multi-stage login.
Type:
"m.login.email.code"
Description:
Login is supported by typing in a code which is sent in an email. This login
consists of multiple requests.
First LoginSubmission::
To respond to this type, reply with::
{
"type": "m.login.email.code",
"user": <user_id>
"email": <email address>
"user": "<user_id or user localpart>",
"email": "<email address>"
}
Returns::
{
"type": m.login.email.code
"session": <session id>
}
The email contains a code which must be sent in the next LoginSubmission::
After validating the email address, the home server MUST send an email containing
an authentication code and return::
{
"type": "m.login.email.code",
"session": <session id>,
"code": <code in email sent>
"session": "<session id>"
}
Returns::
The second request in this login stage involves sending this authentication code::
{
"access_token": <access token>
"type": "m.login.email.code",
"session": "<session id>",
"code": "<code in email sent>"
}
The home server MUST respond to this with either new credentials, the next stage of
the login process, or a standard error response.
Email-based (url)
-----------------
Type: "m.login.email.url"
This is a multi-stage login.
Type:
"m.login.email.url"
Description:
Login is supported by clicking on a URL in an email. This login consists of
multiple requests.
First LoginSubmission::
To respond to this type, reply with::
{
"type": "m.login.email.url",
"user": <user_id>
"email": <email address>
"user": "<user_id or user localpart>",
"email": "<email address>"
}
Returns::
After validating the email address, the home server MUST send an email containing
an authentication URL and return::
{
"session": <session id>
"type": "m.login.email.url",
"session": "<session id>"
}
The email contains a URL which must be clicked. After it has been clicked, the
client should perform a request::
{
"type": "m.login.email.code",
"session": <session id>
}
Returns::
{
"access_token": <access token>
}
Example:
Assume you are @bob:matrix.org and you wish to login on another mobile device.
First, you GET /login which returns::
{
"type": "m.login.email.url"
}
Your client knows how to handle this, so your client prompts the user to enter
their email address. This is then submitted::
client should perform another request::
{
"type": "m.login.email.url",
"user": "@bob:matrix.org",
"email": "bob@mydomain.com"
"session": "<session id>"
}
The server confirms that bob@mydomain.com is linked to @bob:matrix.org, then
sends an email to this address and returns::
The home server MUST respond to this with either new credentials, the next stage of
the login process, or a standard error response.
A common client implementation will be to periodically poll until the link is clicked.
If the link has not been visited yet, a standard error response with an errcode of
``M_LOGIN_EMAIL_URL_NOT_YET`` should be returned.
N-Factor Authentication
-----------------------
Multiple login stages can be combined to create N-factor authentication during login.
This can be achieved by responding with the ``'next'`` login type on completion of a
previous login stage::
{
"session": "ewuigf7462"
"next": "<next login type>"
}
The client then starts polling the server with the following::
If a home server implements N-factor authentication, it MUST respond with all
``'stages'`` when initially queried for their login requirements::
{
"type": "m.login.email.url",
"session": "ewuigf7462"
"type": "<1st login type>",
"stages": [ <1st login type>, <2nd login type>, ... , <Nth login type> ]
}
(Alternatively, the server could send the device a push notification when the
email has been validated). The email arrives and it contains a URL to click on.
The user clicks on the which completes the login process with the server. The
next time the client polls, it returns::
This can be represented conceptually as::
{
"access_token": "abcdef0123456789"
}
N-Factor auth
-------------
Multiple login stages can be combined with the "next" key in the LoginResult.
Example:
A server demands an email.code then password auth before logging in. First, the
client performs a GET /login which returns::
{
"type": "m.login.email.code",
"stages": ["m.login.email.code", "m.login.password"]
}
The client performs the email login (See "Email-based (code)"), but instead of
returning an access_token, it returns::
{
"next": "m.login.password"
}
The client then presents a user/password screen and the login continues until
this is complete (See "Password-based"), which then returns the "access_token".
_______________________
| Login Stage 1 |
| type: "<login type1>" |
| ___________________ |
| |_Request_1_________| | <-- Returns "session" key which is used throughout.
| ___________________ |
| |_Request_2_________| | <-- Returns a "next" value of "login type2"
|_______________________|
|
|
_________V_____________
| Login Stage 2 |
| type: "<login type2>" |
| ___________________ |
| |_Request_1_________| |
| ___________________ |
| |_Request_2_________| |
| ___________________ |
| |_Request_3_________| | <-- Returns a "next" value of "login type3"
|_______________________|
|
|
_________V_____________
| Login Stage 3 |
| type: "<login type3>" |
| ___________________ |
| |_Request_1_________| | <-- Returns user credentials
|_______________________|
Fallback
--------
Clients cannot be expected to be able to know how to process every single
login type. If a client determines it does not know how to handle a given
login type, it should request a login fallback page::
If the client does NOT know how to handle the given type, they should::
GET /login/fallback
GET matrix/client/api/v1/login/fallback
This MUST return an HTML page which can perform the entire login process.