This moves all the invalidations into a single place and de-duplicates
the code involved in invalidating caches for a given event by using
the base class method.
More prep work for asyncronous caching, also makes all process_replication_rows methods consistent (presence handler already is so).
Signed off by Nick @ Beeper (@Fizzadar)
Some experimental prep work to enable external event caching based on #9379 & #12955. Doesn't actually move the cache at all, just lays the groundwork for async implemented caches.
Signed off by Nick @ Beeper (@Fizzadar)
This should speed up push rule calculations for rooms with large numbers of local users when the main push rule cache fails.
Co-authored-by: reivilibre <oliverw@matrix.org>
This is allowed per MSC2675, although the original implementation did
not allow for it and would return an empty chunk / not bundle aggregations.
The main thing to improve is that the various caches get cleared properly
when an event is redacted, and that edits must not leak if the original
event is redacted (as that would presumably leak something similar to
the original event content).
The get_users_in_room and get_users_in_room_with_profiles
are now only invalidated when the membership of a room changes,
instead of during any state change in the room.
Empirically, this helped my server considerably when handling gaps in Matrix HQ. The problem was that we would repeatedly call have_seen_events for the same set of (50K or so) auth_events, each of which would take many minutes to complete, even though it's only an index scan.
* Make `invalidate` and `invalidate_many` do the same thing
... so that we can do either over the invalidation replication stream, and also
because they always confused me a bit.
* Kill off `invalidate_many`
* changelog
Part of #9744
Removes all redundant `# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-` lines from files, as python 3 automatically reads source code as utf-8 now.
`Signed-off-by: Jonathan de Jong <jonathan@automatia.nl>`
The function is used for two purposes: 1) for subscribers of streams to
get a token they can use to get further updates with, and 2) for
replication to track position of the writers of the stream.
For streams with a single writer the two scenarios produce the same
result, however the situation becomes complicated for streams with
multiple writers. The current `MultiWriterIdGenerator` does not
correctly handle the first case (which is not an issue as its only used
for the `caches` stream which nothing subscribes to outside of
replication).
Nick Mills-Barrett