Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sean Quah f792dd74e1
Remove option to skip locking of tables during emulated upserts (#14469)
To perform an emulated upsert into a table safely, we must either:
 * lock the table,
 * be the only writer upserting into the table
 * or rely on another unique index being present.

When the 2nd or 3rd cases were applicable, we previously avoided locking
the table as an optimization. However, as seen in #14406, it is easy to
slip up when adding new schema deltas and corrupt the database.

The only time we lock when performing emulated upserts is while waiting
for background updates on postgres. On sqlite, we do no locking at all.

Let's remove the option to skip locking tables, so that we don't shoot
ourselves in the foot again.

Signed-off-by: Sean Quah <seanq@matrix.org>
2022-11-28 13:42:06 +00:00
David Robertson 8dc666f785
Correct type hint for room_batch.py (#11310)
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-11-11 16:49:28 +00:00
Eric Eastwood 84f235aea4
Rename to more clear `get_insertion_event_id_by_batch_id` (MSC2716) (#11244)
`get_insertion_event_by_batch_id` -> `get_insertion_event_id_by_batch_id`

Split out from https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/11114
2021-11-08 21:21:10 -06:00
Eric Eastwood 35d6b914eb
Resolve and share `state_groups` for all historical events in batch (MSC2716) (#10975)
Resolve and share `state_groups` for all historical events in batch.  This also helps for showing the appropriate avatar/displayname in Element and will work whenever `/messages` has one of the historical messages as the first message in the batch.

This does have the flaw where if you just insert a single historical event somewhere, it probably won't resolve the state correctly from `/messages` or `/context` since it will grab a non historical event above or below with resolved state which never included the historical state back then. For the same reasions, this also does not work in Element between the transition from actual messages to historical messages. In the Gitter case, this isn't really a problem since all of the historical messages are in one big lump at the beginning of the room.

For a future iteration, might be good to look at `/messages` and `/context` to additionally add the `state` for any historical messages in that batch.

---

How are the `state_groups` shared? To illustrate the `state_group` sharing, see this example:


**Before** (new `state_group` for every event 😬, very inefficient):
```
# Tests from https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/pull/206
$ COMPLEMENT_ALWAYS_PRINT_SERVER_LOGS=1 COMPLEMENT_DIR=../complement ./scripts-dev/complement.sh TestBackfillingHistory/parallel/should_resolve_member_state_events_for_historical_events
create_new_client_event m.room.member event=$_JXfwUDIWS6xKGG4SmZXjSFrizhARM7QblhATVWWUcA state_group=None
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.insertion event=$1ZBfmBKEjg94d-vGYymKrVYeghwBOuGJ3wubU1-I9y0 state_group=9
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.insertion event=$Mq2JvRetTyclPuozRI682SAjYp3GqRuPc8_cH5-ezPY state_group=10
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$MfmY4rBQkxrIp8jVwVMTJ4PKnxSigpG9E2cn7S0AtTo state_group=11
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$uYOv6V8wiF7xHwOMt-60d1AoOIbqLgrDLz6ZIQDdWUI state_group=12
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$PAbkJRMxb0bX4A6av463faiAhxkE3FEObM1xB4D0UG4 state_group=13
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.batch event=$Oy_S7AWN7rJQe_MYwGPEy6RtbYklrI-tAhmfiLrCaKI state_group=14
```

**After** (all events in batch sharing `state_group=10`) (the base insertion event has `state_group=8` which matches the `prev_event` we're inserting next to):

```
# Tests from https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/pull/206
$ COMPLEMENT_ALWAYS_PRINT_SERVER_LOGS=1 COMPLEMENT_DIR=../complement ./scripts-dev/complement.sh TestBackfillingHistory/parallel/should_resolve_member_state_events_for_historical_events
create_new_client_event m.room.member event=$PWomJ8PwENYEYuVNoG30gqtybuQQSZ55eldBUSs0i0U state_group=None
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.insertion event=$e_mCU7Eah9ABF6nQU7lu4E1RxIWccNF05AKaTT5m3lw state_group=9
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.insertion event=$ui7A3_GdXIcJq0C8GpyrF8X7B3DTjMd_WGCjogax7xU state_group=10
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$EnTIM5rEGVezQJiYl62uFBl6kJ7B-sMxWqe2D_4FX1I state_group=10
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$LGx5jGONnBPuNhAuZqHeEoXChd9ryVkuTZatGisOPjk state_group=10
create_new_client_event m.room.message event=$wW0zwoN50lbLu1KoKbybVMxLbKUj7GV_olozIc5i3M0 state_group=10
create_new_client_event org.matrix.msc2716.batch event=$5ZB6dtzqFBCEuMRgpkU201Qhx3WtXZGTz_YgldL6JrQ state_group=10
```
2021-10-13 17:44:00 -05:00
Eric Eastwood 9fd057b8c5
Ensure `(room_id, next_batch_id)` is unique to avoid cross-talk/conflicts between batches (MSC2716) (#10877)
Part of [MSC2716](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2716)

Part of https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/10737
2021-09-28 21:23:16 -05:00
Eric Eastwood 51e2db3598
Rename MSC2716 things from `chunk` to `batch` to match `/batch_send` endpoint (#10838)
See https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2716#discussion_r684574497

Dropping support for older MSC2716 room versions so we don't have to worry about
supporting both chunk and batch events.
2021-09-21 15:06:28 -05:00
Eric Eastwood 145c006ef7
Verify `?chunk_id` actually corresponds to an insertion event that exists (MSC2716) (#10776) 2021-09-15 09:34:30 +01:00