... and set it everywhere it's called.
while we're here, rename it for consistency with `check_user_in_room` (and to
help check that I haven't missed any instances)
Python will return a tuple whether there are parentheses around the returned values or not.
I'm just sick of my editor complaining about this all over the place :)
--------
- Fix a regression introduced in v1.2.0rc1 which led to incorrect labels on some prometheus metrics. ([\#5734](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/5734))
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=+JBn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v1.2.0rc2' into develop
Bugfixes
--------
- Fix a regression introduced in v1.2.0rc1 which led to incorrect labels on some prometheus metrics. ([\#5734](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/5734))
* Fix servlet metric names
Co-Authored-By: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Remove redundant check
* Cover all return paths
A fix for PR #5626, which returned the original event content as part of a call to /relations.
Only problem was that we were attempting to aggregate the relations on top of it when we did so. We now set bundle_aggregations to False in the get_event call.
We also do this when pulling the relation events as well, because edits of edits are not something we'd like to support here.
When asking for the relations of an event, include the original event in the response. This will mostly be used for efficiently showing edit history, but could be useful in other circumstances.
Richard van der Hoff