2024-07-31 11:20:46 -06:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# This file is licensed under the Affero General Public License (AGPL) version 3.
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2024 New Vector, Ltd
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
|
# it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as
|
|
|
|
|
# published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
|
|
|
|
|
# License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# See the GNU Affero General Public License for more details:
|
|
|
|
|
# <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html>.
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
import logging
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-01 04:25:39 -06:00
|
|
|
from parameterized import parameterized_class
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-31 11:20:46 -06:00
|
|
|
from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import synapse.rest.admin
|
|
|
|
|
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes, HistoryVisibility
|
|
|
|
|
from synapse.rest.client import login, room, sync
|
|
|
|
|
from synapse.server import HomeServer
|
|
|
|
|
from synapse.types import UserID
|
|
|
|
|
from synapse.util import Clock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from tests.rest.client.sliding_sync.test_sliding_sync import SlidingSyncBase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-01 04:25:39 -06:00
|
|
|
# FIXME: This can be removed once we bump `SCHEMA_COMPAT_VERSION` and run the
|
|
|
|
|
# foreground update for
|
|
|
|
|
# `sliding_sync_joined_rooms`/`sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` (tracked by
|
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17623)
|
|
|
|
|
@parameterized_class(
|
|
|
|
|
("use_new_tables",),
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
(True,),
|
|
|
|
|
(False,),
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
class_name_func=lambda cls, num, params_dict: f"{cls.__name__}_{'new' if params_dict['use_new_tables'] else 'fallback'}",
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
2024-07-31 11:20:46 -06:00
|
|
|
class SlidingSyncRoomsInvitesTestCase(SlidingSyncBase):
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
Test to make sure the `rooms` response looks good for invites in the Sliding Sync API.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invites behave a lot different than other rooms because we don't include the
|
|
|
|
|
`timeline` (`num_live`, `limited`, `prev_batch`) or `required_state` in favor of
|
|
|
|
|
some stripped state under the `invite_state` key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knocks probably have the same behavior but the spec doesn't mention knocks yet.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
servlets = [
|
|
|
|
|
synapse.rest.admin.register_servlets,
|
|
|
|
|
login.register_servlets,
|
|
|
|
|
room.register_servlets,
|
|
|
|
|
sync.register_servlets,
|
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
|
|
|
|
|
self.store = hs.get_datastores().main
|
|
|
|
|
self.storage_controllers = hs.get_storage_controllers()
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-09-01 04:25:39 -06:00
|
|
|
super().prepare(reactor, clock, hs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-31 11:20:46 -06:00
|
|
|
def test_rooms_invite_shared_history_initial_sync(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an
|
|
|
|
|
initial sync.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`)
|
|
|
|
|
but we also shouldn't see any timeline events because the history visiblity is
|
|
|
|
|
`shared` and we haven't joined the room yet.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id)
|
|
|
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
# Ensure we're testing with a room with `shared` history visibility which means
|
|
|
|
|
# history visible until you actually join the room.
|
|
|
|
|
history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state(
|
|
|
|
|
room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"),
|
|
|
|
|
HistoryVisibility.SHARED,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before1", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before2", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after4", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Make the Sliding Sync request
|
|
|
|
|
sync_body = {
|
|
|
|
|
"lists": {
|
|
|
|
|
"foo-list": {
|
|
|
|
|
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
|
|
|
|
|
"required_state": [],
|
|
|
|
|
"timeline_limit": 3,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
response_body, _ = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `required_state` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the
|
|
|
|
|
# room (we don't care about the order).
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertCountEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.create",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"join_rule": "public"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": user1_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_rooms_invite_shared_history_incremental_sync(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an
|
|
|
|
|
incremental sync.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`)
|
|
|
|
|
but we also shouldn't see any timeline events because the history visiblity is
|
|
|
|
|
`shared` and we haven't joined the room yet.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id)
|
|
|
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
# Ensure we're testing with a room with `shared` history visibility which means
|
|
|
|
|
# history visible until you actually join the room.
|
|
|
|
|
history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state(
|
|
|
|
|
room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"),
|
|
|
|
|
HistoryVisibility.SHARED,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite1", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite2", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite3", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite4", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sync_body = {
|
|
|
|
|
"lists": {
|
|
|
|
|
"foo-list": {
|
|
|
|
|
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
|
|
|
|
|
"required_state": [],
|
|
|
|
|
"timeline_limit": 3,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
_, from_token = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after token5", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after toekn6", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Make the Sliding Sync request
|
|
|
|
|
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
|
|
|
|
|
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `required_state` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the
|
|
|
|
|
# room (we don't care about the order).
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertCountEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.create",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"join_rule": "public"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": user1_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_rooms_invite_world_readable_history_initial_sync(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an
|
|
|
|
|
initial sync.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`)
|
|
|
|
|
but depending on the semantics we decide, we could potentially see some
|
|
|
|
|
historical events before/after the `from_token` because the history is
|
|
|
|
|
`world_readable`. Same situation for events after the `from_token` if the
|
|
|
|
|
history visibility was set to `invited`.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id)
|
|
|
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
|
|
|
user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
|
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
|
|
|
"preset": "public_chat",
|
|
|
|
|
"initial_state": [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {
|
|
|
|
|
"history_visibility": HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# Ensure we're testing with a room with `world_readable` history visibility
|
|
|
|
|
# which means events are visible to anyone even without membership.
|
|
|
|
|
history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state(
|
|
|
|
|
room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"),
|
|
|
|
|
HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before1", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before2", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after4", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Make the Sliding Sync request
|
|
|
|
|
sync_body = {
|
|
|
|
|
"lists": {
|
|
|
|
|
"foo-list": {
|
|
|
|
|
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
|
|
|
|
|
"required_state": [],
|
|
|
|
|
# Large enough to see the latest events and before the invite
|
|
|
|
|
"timeline_limit": 4,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
response_body, _ = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `required_state` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the
|
|
|
|
|
# room (we don't care about the order).
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertCountEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.create",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"join_rule": "public"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": user1_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_rooms_invite_world_readable_history_incremental_sync(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an
|
|
|
|
|
incremental sync.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`)
|
|
|
|
|
but depending on the semantics we decide, we could potentially see some
|
|
|
|
|
historical events before/after the `from_token` because the history is
|
|
|
|
|
`world_readable`. Same situation for events after the `from_token` if the
|
|
|
|
|
history visibility was set to `invited`.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id)
|
|
|
|
|
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
|
|
|
|
|
user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
|
|
|
|
|
user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
tok=user2_tok,
|
|
|
|
|
extra_content={
|
|
|
|
|
"preset": "public_chat",
|
|
|
|
|
"initial_state": [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {
|
|
|
|
|
"history_visibility": HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# Ensure we're testing with a room with `world_readable` history visibility
|
|
|
|
|
# which means events are visible to anyone even without membership.
|
|
|
|
|
history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state(
|
|
|
|
|
room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"),
|
|
|
|
|
HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite1", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite2", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite3", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite4", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sync_body = {
|
|
|
|
|
"lists": {
|
|
|
|
|
"foo-list": {
|
|
|
|
|
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
|
|
|
|
|
"required_state": [],
|
|
|
|
|
# Large enough to see the latest events and before the invite
|
|
|
|
|
"timeline_limit": 4,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
_, from_token = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after token5", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after toekn6", tok=user2_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Make the incremental Sliding Sync request
|
|
|
|
|
response_body, _ = self.do_sync(sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# `required_state` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"),
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
# We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the
|
|
|
|
|
# room (we don't care about the order).
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertCountEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.create",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"join_rule": "public"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": "",
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"},
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": user2_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"state_key": user1_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
