synapse/tests/storage/test_user_directory.py

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

464 lines
18 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

# Copyright 2018-2021 The Matrix.org Foundation C.I.C.
2018-01-25 14:25:03 -07:00
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
from typing import Any, Dict, Set, Tuple
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
from unittest import mock
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
from unittest.mock import Mock, patch
from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes, Membership, UserTypes
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
from synapse.appservice import ApplicationService
from synapse.rest import admin
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
from synapse.rest.client import login, register, room
from synapse.server import HomeServer
from synapse.storage import DataStore
from synapse.storage.background_updates import _BackgroundUpdateHandler
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
from synapse.storage.roommember import ProfileInfo
from synapse.util import Clock
2018-01-25 14:25:03 -07:00
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
from tests.test_utils.event_injection import inject_member_event
from tests.unittest import HomeserverTestCase, override_config
2018-01-25 14:25:03 -07:00
ALICE = "@alice:a"
BOB = "@bob:b"
BOBBY = "@bobby:a"
# The localpart isn't 'Bela' on purpose so we can test looking up display names.
BELA = "@somenickname:a"
2018-01-25 14:25:03 -07:00
class GetUserDirectoryTables:
"""Helper functions that we want to reuse in tests/handlers/test_user_directory.py"""
def __init__(self, store: DataStore):
self.store = store
async def get_users_in_public_rooms(self) -> Set[Tuple[str, str]]:
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
"""Fetch the entire `users_in_public_rooms` table.
Returns a list of tuples (user_id, room_id) where room_id is public and
contains the user with the given id.
"""
r = await self.store.db_pool.simple_select_list(
"users_in_public_rooms", None, ("user_id", "room_id")
)
retval = set()
for i in r:
retval.add((i["user_id"], i["room_id"]))
return retval
async def get_users_who_share_private_rooms(self) -> Set[Tuple[str, str, str]]:
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
"""Fetch the entire `users_who_share_private_rooms` table.
Returns a set of tuples (user_id, other_user_id, room_id) corresponding
to the rows of `users_who_share_private_rooms`.
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
"""
rows = await self.store.db_pool.simple_select_list(
"users_who_share_private_rooms",
None,
["user_id", "other_user_id", "room_id"],
)
rv = set()
for row in rows:
rv.add((row["user_id"], row["other_user_id"], row["room_id"]))
return rv
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
async def get_users_in_user_directory(self) -> Set[str]:
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
"""Fetch the set of users in the `user_directory` table.
This is useful when checking we've correctly excluded users from the directory.
"""
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
result = await self.store.db_pool.simple_select_list(
"user_directory",
None,
["user_id"],
)
return {row["user_id"] for row in result}
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
async def get_profiles_in_user_directory(self) -> Dict[str, ProfileInfo]:
"""Fetch users and their profiles from the `user_directory` table.
This is useful when we want to inspect display names and avatars.
It's almost the entire contents of the `user_directory` table: the only
thing missing is an unused room_id column.
"""
rows = await self.store.db_pool.simple_select_list(
"user_directory",
None,
("user_id", "display_name", "avatar_url"),
)
return {
row["user_id"]: ProfileInfo(
display_name=row["display_name"], avatar_url=row["avatar_url"]
)
for row in rows
}
async def get_tables(
self,
) -> Tuple[Set[str], Set[Tuple[str, str]], Set[Tuple[str, str, str]]]:
"""Multiple tests want to inspect these tables, so expose them together."""
return (
await self.get_users_in_user_directory(),
await self.get_users_in_public_rooms(),
await self.get_users_who_share_private_rooms(),
)
class UserDirectoryInitialPopulationTestcase(HomeserverTestCase):
"""Ensure that rebuilding the directory writes the correct data to the DB.
See also tests/handlers/test_user_directory.py for similar checks. They
test the incremental updates, rather than the big rebuild.
"""
servlets = [
login.register_servlets,
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
admin.register_servlets,
room.register_servlets,
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
register.register_servlets,
]
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
def make_homeserver(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock) -> HomeServer:
self.appservice = ApplicationService(
token="i_am_an_app_service",
id="1234",
namespaces={"users": [{"regex": r"@as_user.*", "exclusive": True}]},
sender="@as:test",
)
mock_load_appservices = Mock(return_value=[self.appservice])
with patch(
"synapse.storage.databases.main.appservice.load_appservices",
mock_load_appservices,
):
hs = super().make_homeserver(reactor, clock)
return hs
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
self.store = hs.get_datastores().main
self.user_dir_helper = GetUserDirectoryTables(self.store)
def _purge_and_rebuild_user_dir(self) -> None:
"""Nuke the user directory tables, start the background process to
repopulate them, and wait for the process to complete. This allows us
to inspect the outcome of the background process alone, without any of
the other incremental updates.
"""
self.get_success(self.store.update_user_directory_stream_pos(None))
self.get_success(self.store.delete_all_from_user_dir())
shares_private = self.get_success(
self.user_dir_helper.get_users_who_share_private_rooms()
)
public_users = self.get_success(
self.user_dir_helper.get_users_in_public_rooms()
)
# Nothing updated yet
self.assertEqual(shares_private, set())
self.assertEqual(public_users, set())
# Ugh, have to reset this flag
self.store.db_pool.updates._all_done = False
self.get_success(
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert(
"background_updates",
{
"update_name": "populate_user_directory_createtables",
"progress_json": "{}",
},
)
)
self.get_success(
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert(
"background_updates",
{
"update_name": "populate_user_directory_process_rooms",
"progress_json": "{}",
"depends_on": "populate_user_directory_createtables",
},
)
)
self.get_success(
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert(
"background_updates",
{
"update_name": "populate_user_directory_process_users",
"progress_json": "{}",
"depends_on": "populate_user_directory_process_rooms",
},
)
)
self.get_success(
self.store.db_pool.simple_insert(
"background_updates",
{
"update_name": "populate_user_directory_cleanup",
"progress_json": "{}",
"depends_on": "populate_user_directory_process_users",
},
)
)
self.wait_for_background_updates()
def test_initial(self) -> None:
"""
The user directory's initial handler correctly updates the search tables.
"""
u1 = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
u1_token = self.login(u1, "pass")
u2 = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
u2_token = self.login(u2, "pass")
u3 = self.register_user("user3", "pass")
u3_token = self.login(u3, "pass")
room = self.helper.create_room_as(u1, is_public=True, tok=u1_token)
self.helper.invite(room, src=u1, targ=u2, tok=u1_token)
self.helper.join(room, user=u2, tok=u2_token)
private_room = self.helper.create_room_as(u1, is_public=False, tok=u1_token)
self.helper.invite(private_room, src=u1, targ=u3, tok=u1_token)
self.helper.join(private_room, user=u3, tok=u3_token)
# Do the initial population of the user directory via the background update
self._purge_and_rebuild_user_dir()
users, in_public, in_private = self.get_success(
self.user_dir_helper.get_tables()
)
# User 1 and User 2 are in the same public room
self.assertEqual(in_public, {(u1, room), (u2, room)})
# User 1 and User 3 share private rooms
self.assertEqual(in_private, {(u1, u3, private_room), (u3, u1, private_room)})
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
# All three should have entries in the directory
self.assertEqual(users, {u1, u2, u3})
# The next four tests (test_population_excludes_*) all set up
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
# - A normal user included in the user dir
# - A public and private room created by that user
# - A user excluded from the room dir, belonging to both rooms
# They match similar logic in handlers/test_user_directory.py But that tests
# updating the directory; this tests rebuilding it from scratch.
def _create_rooms_and_inject_memberships(
self, creator: str, token: str, joiner: str
) -> Tuple[str, str]:
"""Create a public and private room as a normal user.
Then get the `joiner` into those rooms.
"""
public_room = self.helper.create_room_as(
creator,
is_public=True,
# See https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/10951
extra_content={"visibility": "public"},
tok=token,
)
private_room = self.helper.create_room_as(creator, is_public=False, tok=token)
# HACK: get the user into these rooms
self.get_success(inject_member_event(self.hs, public_room, joiner, "join"))
self.get_success(inject_member_event(self.hs, private_room, joiner, "join"))
return public_room, private_room
def _check_room_sharing_tables(
self, normal_user: str, public_room: str, private_room: str
) -> None:
# After rebuilding the directory, we should only see the normal user.
users, in_public, in_private = self.get_success(
self.user_dir_helper.get_tables()
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
)
self.assertEqual(users, {normal_user})
self.assertEqual(in_public, {(normal_user, public_room)})
self.assertEqual(in_private, set())
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
def test_population_excludes_support_user(self) -> None:
# Create a normal and support user.
user = self.register_user("user", "pass")
token = self.login(user, "pass")
support = "@support1:test"
self.get_success(
self.store.register_user(
user_id=support, password_hash=None, user_type=UserTypes.SUPPORT
)
)
# Join the support user to rooms owned by the normal user.
public, private = self._create_rooms_and_inject_memberships(
user, token, support
)
# Rebuild the directory.
self._purge_and_rebuild_user_dir()
# Check the support user is not in the directory.
self._check_room_sharing_tables(user, public, private)
def test_population_excludes_deactivated_user(self) -> None:
user = self.register_user("naughty", "pass")
admin = self.register_user("admin", "pass", admin=True)
admin_token = self.login(admin, "pass")
# Deactivate the user.
channel = self.make_request(
"PUT",
f"/_synapse/admin/v2/users/{user}",
access_token=admin_token,
content={"deactivated": True},
)
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200)
self.assertEqual(channel.json_body["deactivated"], True)
# Join the deactivated user to rooms owned by the admin.
# Is this something that could actually happen outside of a test?
public, private = self._create_rooms_and_inject_memberships(
admin, admin_token, user
)
# Rebuild the user dir. The deactivated user should be missing.
self._purge_and_rebuild_user_dir()
self._check_room_sharing_tables(admin, public, private)
def test_population_excludes_appservice_user(self) -> None:
# Register an AS user.
user = self.register_user("user", "pass")
token = self.login(user, "pass")
as_user, _ = self.register_appservice_user(
"as_user_potato", self.appservice.token
)
Consistently exclude from user_directory (#10960) * Introduce `should_include_local_users_in_dir` We exclude three kinds of local users from the user_directory tables. At present we don't consistently exclude all three in the same places. This commit introduces a new function to gather those exclusion conditions together. Because we have to handle local and remote users in different ways, I've made that function only consider the case of remote users. It's the caller's responsibility to make the local versus remote distinction clear and correct. A test fixup is required. The test now hits a path which makes db queries against the users table. The expected rows were missing, because we were using a dummy user that hadn't actually been registered. We also add new test cases to covert the exclusion logic. ---- By my reading this makes these changes: * When an app service user registers or changes their profile, they will _not_ be added to the user directory. (Previously only support and deactivated users were excluded). This is consistent with the logic that rebuilds the user directory. See also [the discussion here](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10914#discussion_r716859548). * When rebuilding the directory, exclude support and disabled users from room sharing tables. Previously only appservice users were excluded. * Exclude all three categories of local users when rebuilding the directory. Previously `_populate_user_directory_process_users` didn't do any exclusion. Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-10-04 05:45:51 -06:00
# Join the AS user to rooms owned by the normal user.
public, private = self._create_rooms_and_inject_memberships(
user, token, as_user
)
# Rebuild the directory.
self._purge_and_rebuild_user_dir()
# Check the AS user is not in the directory.
self._check_room_sharing_tables(user, public, private)
def test_population_excludes_appservice_sender(self) -> None:
user = self.register_user("user", "pass")
token = self.login(user, "pass")
# Join the AS sender to rooms owned by the normal user.
public, private = self._create_rooms_and_inject_memberships(
user, token, self.appservice.sender
)
# Rebuild the directory.
self._purge_and_rebuild_user_dir()
# Check the AS sender is not in the directory.
self._check_room_sharing_tables(user, public, private)
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
def test_population_conceals_private_nickname(self) -> None:
# Make a private room, and set a nickname within
user = self.register_user("aaaa", "pass")
user_token = self.login(user, "pass")
private_room = self.helper.create_room_as(user, is_public=False, tok=user_token)
self.helper.send_state(
private_room,
EventTypes.Member,
state_key=user,
body={"membership": Membership.JOIN, "displayname": "BBBB"},
tok=user_token,
)
# Rebuild the user directory. Make the rescan of the `users` table a no-op
# so we only see the effect of scanning the `room_memberships` table.
async def mocked_process_users(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> int:
await self.store.db_pool.updates._end_background_update(
"populate_user_directory_process_users"
)
return 1
with mock.patch.dict(
self.store.db_pool.updates._background_update_handlers,
populate_user_directory_process_users=_BackgroundUpdateHandler(
mocked_process_users,
),
2021-10-05 11:35:25 -06:00
):
self._purge_and_rebuild_user_dir()
# Local users are ignored by the scan over rooms
users = self.get_success(self.user_dir_helper.get_profiles_in_user_directory())
self.assertEqual(users, {})
# Do a full rebuild including the scan over the `users` table. The local
# user should appear with their profile name.
self._purge_and_rebuild_user_dir()
users = self.get_success(self.user_dir_helper.get_profiles_in_user_directory())
self.assertEqual(
users, {user: ProfileInfo(display_name="aaaa", avatar_url=None)}
)
class UserDirectoryStoreTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
self.store = hs.get_datastores().main
2018-01-25 14:25:03 -07:00
# alice and bob are both in !room_id. bobby is not but shares
# a homeserver with alice.
self.get_success(self.store.update_profile_in_user_dir(ALICE, "alice", None))
self.get_success(self.store.update_profile_in_user_dir(BOB, "bob", None))
self.get_success(self.store.update_profile_in_user_dir(BOBBY, "bobby", None))
self.get_success(self.store.update_profile_in_user_dir(BELA, "Bela", None))
self.get_success(self.store.add_users_in_public_rooms("!room:id", (ALICE, BOB)))
2018-01-25 14:25:03 -07:00
def test_search_user_dir(self) -> None:
2018-01-25 14:25:03 -07:00
# normally when alice searches the directory she should just find
# bob because bobby doesn't share a room with her.
r = self.get_success(self.store.search_user_dir(ALICE, "bob", 10))
2018-01-25 14:25:03 -07:00
self.assertFalse(r["limited"])
self.assertEqual(1, len(r["results"]))
2018-08-10 07:54:09 -06:00
self.assertDictEqual(
r["results"][0], {"user_id": BOB, "display_name": "bob", "avatar_url": None}
)
2018-01-25 14:25:03 -07:00
@override_config({"user_directory": {"search_all_users": True}})
def test_search_user_dir_all_users(self) -> None:
r = self.get_success(self.store.search_user_dir(ALICE, "bob", 10))
self.assertFalse(r["limited"])
self.assertEqual(2, len(r["results"]))
self.assertDictEqual(
r["results"][0],
{"user_id": BOB, "display_name": "bob", "avatar_url": None},
)
self.assertDictEqual(
r["results"][1],
{"user_id": BOBBY, "display_name": "bobby", "avatar_url": None},
)
@override_config({"user_directory": {"search_all_users": True}})
def test_search_user_dir_stop_words(self) -> None:
"""Tests that a user can look up another user by searching for the start if its
display name even if that name happens to be a common English word that would
usually be ignored in full text searches.
"""
r = self.get_success(self.store.search_user_dir(ALICE, "be", 10))
self.assertFalse(r["limited"])
self.assertEqual(1, len(r["results"]))
self.assertDictEqual(
r["results"][0],
{"user_id": BELA, "display_name": "Bela", "avatar_url": None},
)