Fix overwriting profile when making room public (#11003)
This splits apart `handle_new_user` into a function which adds an entry to the `user_directory` and a function which updates the room sharing tables. I plan to continue doing more of this kind of refactoring to clarify the implementation.
This commit is contained in:
parent
eb9ddc8c2e
commit
670a8d9a1e
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
Fix a long-standing bug where a user's per-room nickname/avatar would overwrite their profile in the user directory when a room was made public.
|
|
@ -242,18 +242,15 @@ class UserDirectoryHandler(StateDeltasHandler):
|
|||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
if change is MatchChange.now_true: # The user joined
|
||||
event = await self.store.get_event(event_id, allow_none=True)
|
||||
# It isn't expected for this event to not exist, but we
|
||||
# don't want the entire background process to break.
|
||||
if event is None:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
profile = ProfileInfo(
|
||||
avatar_url=event.content.get("avatar_url"),
|
||||
display_name=event.content.get("displayname"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
await self._handle_new_user(room_id, state_key, profile)
|
||||
# This may be the first time we've seen a remote user. If
|
||||
# so, ensure we have a directory entry for them. (We don't
|
||||
# need to do this for local users: their directory entry
|
||||
# is created at the point of registration.
|
||||
if is_remote:
|
||||
await self._upsert_directory_entry_for_remote_user(
|
||||
state_key, event_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
await self._track_user_joined_room(room_id, state_key)
|
||||
else: # The user left
|
||||
await self._handle_remove_user(room_id, state_key)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
|
@ -303,7 +300,7 @@ class UserDirectoryHandler(StateDeltasHandler):
|
|||
room_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
logger.debug("Change: %r, publicness: %r", publicness, is_public)
|
||||
logger.debug("Publicness change: %r, is_public: %r", publicness, is_public)
|
||||
|
||||
if publicness is MatchChange.now_true and not is_public:
|
||||
# If we became world readable but room isn't currently public then
|
||||
|
@ -314,42 +311,50 @@ class UserDirectoryHandler(StateDeltasHandler):
|
|||
# ignore the change
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
other_users_in_room_with_profiles = (
|
||||
await self.store.get_users_in_room_with_profiles(room_id)
|
||||
)
|
||||
users_in_room = await self.store.get_users_in_room(room_id)
|
||||
|
||||
# Remove every user from the sharing tables for that room.
|
||||
for user_id in other_users_in_room_with_profiles.keys():
|
||||
for user_id in users_in_room:
|
||||
await self.store.remove_user_who_share_room(user_id, room_id)
|
||||
|
||||
# Then, re-add them to the tables.
|
||||
# NOTE: this is not the most efficient method, as handle_new_user sets
|
||||
# NOTE: this is not the most efficient method, as _track_user_joined_room sets
|
||||
# up local_user -> other_user and other_user_whos_local -> local_user,
|
||||
# which when ran over an entire room, will result in the same values
|
||||
# being added multiple times. The batching upserts shouldn't make this
|
||||
# too bad, though.
|
||||
for user_id, profile in other_users_in_room_with_profiles.items():
|
||||
await self._handle_new_user(room_id, user_id, profile)
|
||||
for user_id in users_in_room:
|
||||
await self._track_user_joined_room(room_id, user_id)
|
||||
|
||||
async def _handle_new_user(
|
||||
self, room_id: str, user_id: str, profile: ProfileInfo
|
||||
async def _upsert_directory_entry_for_remote_user(
|
||||
self, user_id: str, event_id: str
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""Called when we might need to add user to directory
|
||||
|
||||
Args:
|
||||
room_id: The room ID that user joined or started being public
|
||||
user_id
|
||||
"""A remote user has just joined a room. Ensure they have an entry in
|
||||
the user directory. The caller is responsible for making sure they're
|
||||
remote.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
event = await self.store.get_event(event_id, allow_none=True)
|
||||
# It isn't expected for this event to not exist, but we
|
||||
# don't want the entire background process to break.
|
||||
if event is None:
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
logger.debug("Adding new user to dir, %r", user_id)
|
||||
|
||||
await self.store.update_profile_in_user_dir(
|
||||
user_id, profile.display_name, profile.avatar_url
|
||||
user_id, event.content.get("displayname"), event.content.get("avatar_url")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
async def _track_user_joined_room(self, room_id: str, user_id: str) -> None:
|
||||
"""Someone's just joined a room. Update `users_in_public_rooms` or
|
||||
`users_who_share_private_rooms` as appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
The caller is responsible for ensuring that the given user is not excluded
|
||||
from the user directory.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
is_public = await self.store.is_room_world_readable_or_publicly_joinable(
|
||||
room_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Now we update users who share rooms with users.
|
||||
other_users_in_room = await self.store.get_users_in_room(room_id)
|
||||
|
||||
if is_public:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -372,8 +372,6 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
|
|||
# Alice makes two rooms. Bob joins one of them.
|
||||
room1 = self.helper.create_room_as(alice, tok=alice_token)
|
||||
room2 = self.helper.create_room_as(alice, tok=alice_token)
|
||||
print("room1=", room1)
|
||||
print("room2=", room2)
|
||||
self.helper.join(room1, bob, tok=bob_token)
|
||||
|
||||
# The user sharing tables should have been updated.
|
||||
|
@ -436,6 +434,75 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
|
|||
0,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_making_room_public_doesnt_alter_directory_entry(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Per-room names shouldn't go to the directory when the room becomes public.
|
||||
|
||||
This isn't about preventing a leak (the room is now public, so the nickname
|
||||
is too). It's about preserving the invariant that we only show a user's public
|
||||
profile in the user directory results.
|
||||
|
||||
I made this a Synapse test case rather than a Complement one because
|
||||
I think this is (strictly speaking) an implementation choice. Synapse
|
||||
has chosen to only ever use the public profile when responding to a user
|
||||
directory search. There's no privacy leak here, because making the room
|
||||
public discloses the per-room name.
|
||||
|
||||
The spec doesn't mandate anything about _how_ a user
|
||||
should appear in a /user_directory/search result. Hypothetical example:
|
||||
suppose Bob searches for Alice. When representing Alice in a search
|
||||
result, it's reasonable to use any of Alice's nicknames that Bob is
|
||||
aware of. Heck, maybe we even want to use lots of them in a combined
|
||||
displayname like `Alice (aka "ali", "ally", "41iC3")`.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO the same should apply when Alice is a remote user.
|
||||
alice = self.register_user("alice", "pass")
|
||||
alice_token = self.login(alice, "pass")
|
||||
bob = self.register_user("bob", "pass")
|
||||
bob_token = self.login(bob, "pass")
|
||||
|
||||
# Alice and Bob are in a private room.
|
||||
room = self.helper.create_room_as(alice, is_public=False, tok=alice_token)
|
||||
self.helper.invite(room, src=alice, targ=bob, tok=alice_token)
|
||||
self.helper.join(room, user=bob, tok=bob_token)
|
||||
|
||||
# Alice has a nickname unique to that room.
|
||||
|
||||
self.helper.send_state(
|
||||
room,
|
||||
"m.room.member",
|
||||
{
|
||||
"displayname": "Freddy Mercury",
|
||||
"membership": "join",
|
||||
},
|
||||
alice_token,
|
||||
state_key=alice,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Check Alice isn't recorded as being in a public room.
|
||||
public = self.get_success(self.user_dir_helper.get_users_in_public_rooms())
|
||||
self.assertNotIn((alice, room), public)
|
||||
|
||||
# One of them makes the room public.
|
||||
self.helper.send_state(
|
||||
room,
|
||||
"m.room.join_rules",
|
||||
{"join_rule": "public"},
|
||||
alice_token,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Check that Alice is now recorded as being in a public room
|
||||
public = self.get_success(self.user_dir_helper.get_users_in_public_rooms())
|
||||
self.assertIn((alice, room), public)
|
||||
|
||||
# Alice's display name remains the same in the user directory.
|
||||
search_result = self.get_success(self.handler.search_users(bob, alice, 10))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
search_result["results"],
|
||||
[{"display_name": "alice", "avatar_url": None, "user_id": alice}],
|
||||
0,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_private_room(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
A user can be searched for only by people that are either in a public
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue