Merge pull request #4718 from matrix-org/erikj/fix_backfill_state_shred
Fix backfill storing incorrect state for events
This commit is contained in:
commit
69efe6fb16
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||||
|
Fix paginating over federation persisting incorrect state.
|
|
@ -770,10 +770,26 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
|
||||||
set(auth_events.keys()) | set(state_events.keys())
|
set(auth_events.keys()) | set(state_events.keys())
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# We now have a chunk of events plus associated state and auth chain to
|
||||||
|
# persist. We do the persistence in two steps:
|
||||||
|
# 1. Auth events and state get persisted as outliers, plus the
|
||||||
|
# backward extremities get persisted (as non-outliers).
|
||||||
|
# 2. The rest of the events in the chunk get persisted one by one, as
|
||||||
|
# each one depends on the previous event for its state.
|
||||||
|
#
|
||||||
|
# The important thing is that events in the chunk get persisted as
|
||||||
|
# non-outliers, including when those events are also in the state or
|
||||||
|
# auth chain. Caution must therefore be taken to ensure that they are
|
||||||
|
# not accidentally marked as outliers.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Step 1a: persist auth events that *don't* appear in the chunk
|
||||||
ev_infos = []
|
ev_infos = []
|
||||||
for a in auth_events.values():
|
for a in auth_events.values():
|
||||||
if a.event_id in seen_events:
|
# We only want to persist auth events as outliers that we haven't
|
||||||
|
# seen and aren't about to persist as part of the backfilled chunk.
|
||||||
|
if a.event_id in seen_events or a.event_id in event_map:
|
||||||
continue
|
continue
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
a.internal_metadata.outlier = True
|
a.internal_metadata.outlier = True
|
||||||
ev_infos.append({
|
ev_infos.append({
|
||||||
"event": a,
|
"event": a,
|
||||||
|
@ -785,14 +801,21 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
})
|
})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Step 1b: persist the events in the chunk we fetched state for (i.e.
|
||||||
|
# the backwards extremities) as non-outliers.
|
||||||
for e_id in events_to_state:
|
for e_id in events_to_state:
|
||||||
|
# For paranoia we ensure that these events are marked as
|
||||||
|
# non-outliers
|
||||||
|
ev = event_map[e_id]
|
||||||
|
assert(not ev.internal_metadata.is_outlier())
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ev_infos.append({
|
ev_infos.append({
|
||||||
"event": event_map[e_id],
|
"event": ev,
|
||||||
"state": events_to_state[e_id],
|
"state": events_to_state[e_id],
|
||||||
"auth_events": {
|
"auth_events": {
|
||||||
(auth_events[a_id].type, auth_events[a_id].state_key):
|
(auth_events[a_id].type, auth_events[a_id].state_key):
|
||||||
auth_events[a_id]
|
auth_events[a_id]
|
||||||
for a_id in event_map[e_id].auth_event_ids()
|
for a_id in ev.auth_event_ids()
|
||||||
if a_id in auth_events
|
if a_id in auth_events
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
})
|
})
|
||||||
|
@ -802,12 +825,17 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
|
||||||
backfilled=True,
|
backfilled=True,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Step 2: Persist the rest of the events in the chunk one by one
|
||||||
events.sort(key=lambda e: e.depth)
|
events.sort(key=lambda e: e.depth)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for event in events:
|
for event in events:
|
||||||
if event in events_to_state:
|
if event in events_to_state:
|
||||||
continue
|
continue
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# For paranoia we ensure that these events are marked as
|
||||||
|
# non-outliers
|
||||||
|
assert(not event.internal_metadata.is_outlier())
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# We store these one at a time since each event depends on the
|
# We store these one at a time since each event depends on the
|
||||||
# previous to work out the state.
|
# previous to work out the state.
|
||||||
# TODO: We can probably do something more clever here.
|
# TODO: We can probably do something more clever here.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue