Fix bug which caused rejected events to be stored with the wrong room state (#6320)
Fixes a bug where rejected events were persisted with the wrong state group. Also fixes an occasional internal-server-error when receiving events over federation which are rejected and (possibly because they are backwards-extremities) have no prev_group. Fixes #6289.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e3ab8afdc
commit
807ec3bd99
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
Fix bug which casued rejected events to be persisted with the wrong room state.
|
|
@ -48,10 +48,21 @@ class EventContext:
|
|||
Note that this is a private attribute: it should be accessed via
|
||||
the ``state_group`` property.
|
||||
|
||||
state_group_before_event: The ID of the state group representing the state
|
||||
of the room before this event.
|
||||
|
||||
If this is a non-state event, this will be the same as ``state_group``. If
|
||||
it's a state event, it will be the same as ``prev_group``.
|
||||
|
||||
If ``state_group`` is None (ie, the event is an outlier),
|
||||
``state_group_before_event`` will always also be ``None``.
|
||||
|
||||
prev_group: If it is known, ``state_group``'s prev_group. Note that this being
|
||||
None does not necessarily mean that ``state_group`` does not have
|
||||
a prev_group!
|
||||
|
||||
If the event is a state event, this is normally the same as ``prev_group``.
|
||||
|
||||
If ``state_group`` is None (ie, the event is an outlier), ``prev_group``
|
||||
will always also be ``None``.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -77,7 +88,8 @@ class EventContext:
|
|||
``get_current_state_ids``. _AsyncEventContext impl calculates this
|
||||
on-demand: it will be None until that happens.
|
||||
|
||||
_prev_state_ids: The room state map, excluding this event. For a non-state
|
||||
_prev_state_ids: The room state map, excluding this event - ie, the state
|
||||
in ``state_group_before_event``. For a non-state
|
||||
event, this will be the same as _current_state_events.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that it is a completely different thing to prev_group!
|
||||
|
@ -92,6 +104,7 @@ class EventContext:
|
|||
|
||||
rejected = attr.ib(default=False, type=Union[bool, str])
|
||||
_state_group = attr.ib(default=None, type=Optional[int])
|
||||
state_group_before_event = attr.ib(default=None, type=Optional[int])
|
||||
prev_group = attr.ib(default=None, type=Optional[int])
|
||||
delta_ids = attr.ib(default=None, type=Optional[Dict[Tuple[str, str], str]])
|
||||
app_service = attr.ib(default=None, type=Optional[ApplicationService])
|
||||
|
@ -103,12 +116,18 @@ class EventContext:
|
|||
|
||||
@staticmethod
|
||||
def with_state(
|
||||
state_group, current_state_ids, prev_state_ids, prev_group=None, delta_ids=None
|
||||
state_group,
|
||||
state_group_before_event,
|
||||
current_state_ids,
|
||||
prev_state_ids,
|
||||
prev_group=None,
|
||||
delta_ids=None,
|
||||
):
|
||||
return EventContext(
|
||||
current_state_ids=current_state_ids,
|
||||
prev_state_ids=prev_state_ids,
|
||||
state_group=state_group,
|
||||
state_group_before_event=state_group_before_event,
|
||||
prev_group=prev_group,
|
||||
delta_ids=delta_ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
@ -140,6 +159,7 @@ class EventContext:
|
|||
"event_type": event.type,
|
||||
"event_state_key": event.state_key if event.is_state() else None,
|
||||
"state_group": self._state_group,
|
||||
"state_group_before_event": self.state_group_before_event,
|
||||
"rejected": self.rejected,
|
||||
"prev_group": self.prev_group,
|
||||
"delta_ids": _encode_state_dict(self.delta_ids),
|
||||
|
@ -165,6 +185,7 @@ class EventContext:
|
|||
event_type=input["event_type"],
|
||||
event_state_key=input["event_state_key"],
|
||||
state_group=input["state_group"],
|
||||
state_group_before_event=input["state_group_before_event"],
|
||||
prev_group=input["prev_group"],
|
||||
delta_ids=_decode_state_dict(input["delta_ids"]),
|
||||
rejected=input["rejected"],
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2280,6 +2280,7 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
|
|||
|
||||
return EventContext.with_state(
|
||||
state_group=state_group,
|
||||
state_group_before_event=context.state_group_before_event,
|
||||
current_state_ids=current_state_ids,
|
||||
prev_state_ids=prev_state_ids,
|
||||
prev_group=prev_group,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
from collections import namedtuple
|
||||
from typing import Iterable, Optional
|
||||
|
||||
from six import iteritems, itervalues
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ from twisted.internet import defer
|
|||
|
||||
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes
|
||||
from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, StateResolutionVersions
|
||||
from synapse.events import EventBase
|
||||
from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext
|
||||
from synapse.logging.utils import log_function
|
||||
from synapse.state import v1, v2
|
||||
|
@ -212,15 +214,17 @@ class StateHandler(object):
|
|||
return joined_hosts
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def compute_event_context(self, event, old_state=None):
|
||||
def compute_event_context(
|
||||
self, event: EventBase, old_state: Optional[Iterable[EventBase]] = None
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""Build an EventContext structure for the event.
|
||||
|
||||
This works out what the current state should be for the event, and
|
||||
generates a new state group if necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
Args:
|
||||
event (synapse.events.EventBase):
|
||||
old_state (dict|None): The state at the event if it can't be
|
||||
event:
|
||||
old_state: The state at the event if it can't be
|
||||
calculated from existing events. This is normally only specified
|
||||
when receiving an event from federation where we don't have the
|
||||
prev events for, e.g. when backfilling.
|
||||
|
@ -251,114 +255,104 @@ class StateHandler(object):
|
|||
# group for it.
|
||||
context = EventContext.with_state(
|
||||
state_group=None,
|
||||
state_group_before_event=None,
|
||||
current_state_ids=current_state_ids,
|
||||
prev_state_ids=prev_state_ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return context
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
# first of all, figure out the state before the event
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
if old_state:
|
||||
# We already have the state, so we don't need to calculate it.
|
||||
# Let's just correctly fill out the context and create a
|
||||
# new state group for it.
|
||||
# if we're given the state before the event, then we use that
|
||||
state_ids_before_event = {
|
||||
(s.type, s.state_key): s.event_id for s in old_state
|
||||
}
|
||||
state_group_before_event = None
|
||||
state_group_before_event_prev_group = None
|
||||
deltas_to_state_group_before_event = None
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = {(s.type, s.state_key): s.event_id for s in old_state}
|
||||
|
||||
if event.is_state():
|
||||
key = (event.type, event.state_key)
|
||||
if key in prev_state_ids:
|
||||
replaces = prev_state_ids[key]
|
||||
if replaces != event.event_id: # Paranoia check
|
||||
event.unsigned["replaces_state"] = replaces
|
||||
current_state_ids = dict(prev_state_ids)
|
||||
current_state_ids[key] = event.event_id
|
||||
else:
|
||||
current_state_ids = prev_state_ids
|
||||
|
||||
state_group = yield self.state_store.store_state_group(
|
||||
event.event_id,
|
||||
event.room_id,
|
||||
prev_group=None,
|
||||
delta_ids=None,
|
||||
current_state_ids=current_state_ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
context = EventContext.with_state(
|
||||
state_group=state_group,
|
||||
current_state_ids=current_state_ids,
|
||||
prev_state_ids=prev_state_ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return context
|
||||
|
||||
# otherwise, we'll need to resolve the state across the prev_events.
|
||||
logger.debug("calling resolve_state_groups from compute_event_context")
|
||||
|
||||
entry = yield self.resolve_state_groups_for_events(
|
||||
event.room_id, event.prev_event_ids()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = entry.state
|
||||
prev_group = None
|
||||
delta_ids = None
|
||||
state_ids_before_event = entry.state
|
||||
state_group_before_event = entry.state_group
|
||||
state_group_before_event_prev_group = entry.prev_group
|
||||
deltas_to_state_group_before_event = entry.delta_ids
|
||||
|
||||
if event.is_state():
|
||||
# If this is a state event then we need to create a new state
|
||||
# group for the state after this event.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# make sure that we have a state group at that point. If it's not a state event,
|
||||
# that will be the state group for the new event. If it *is* a state event,
|
||||
# it might get rejected (in which case we'll need to persist it with the
|
||||
# previous state group)
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
if not state_group_before_event:
|
||||
state_group_before_event = yield self.state_store.store_state_group(
|
||||
event.event_id,
|
||||
event.room_id,
|
||||
prev_group=state_group_before_event_prev_group,
|
||||
delta_ids=deltas_to_state_group_before_event,
|
||||
current_state_ids=state_ids_before_event,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# XXX: can we update the state cache entry for the new state group? or
|
||||
# could we set a flag on resolve_state_groups_for_events to tell it to
|
||||
# always make a state group?
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
# now if it's not a state event, we're done
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
if not event.is_state():
|
||||
return EventContext.with_state(
|
||||
state_group_before_event=state_group_before_event,
|
||||
state_group=state_group_before_event,
|
||||
current_state_ids=state_ids_before_event,
|
||||
prev_state_ids=state_ids_before_event,
|
||||
prev_group=state_group_before_event_prev_group,
|
||||
delta_ids=deltas_to_state_group_before_event,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
#
|
||||
# otherwise, we'll need to create a new state group for after the event
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
key = (event.type, event.state_key)
|
||||
if key in prev_state_ids:
|
||||
replaces = prev_state_ids[key]
|
||||
if key in state_ids_before_event:
|
||||
replaces = state_ids_before_event[key]
|
||||
if replaces != event.event_id:
|
||||
event.unsigned["replaces_state"] = replaces
|
||||
|
||||
current_state_ids = dict(prev_state_ids)
|
||||
current_state_ids[key] = event.event_id
|
||||
|
||||
if entry.state_group:
|
||||
# If the state at the event has a state group assigned then
|
||||
# we can use that as the prev group
|
||||
prev_group = entry.state_group
|
||||
state_ids_after_event = dict(state_ids_before_event)
|
||||
state_ids_after_event[key] = event.event_id
|
||||
delta_ids = {key: event.event_id}
|
||||
elif entry.prev_group:
|
||||
# If the state at the event only has a prev group, then we can
|
||||
# use that as a prev group too.
|
||||
prev_group = entry.prev_group
|
||||
delta_ids = dict(entry.delta_ids)
|
||||
delta_ids[key] = event.event_id
|
||||
|
||||
state_group = yield self.state_store.store_state_group(
|
||||
state_group_after_event = yield self.state_store.store_state_group(
|
||||
event.event_id,
|
||||
event.room_id,
|
||||
prev_group=prev_group,
|
||||
prev_group=state_group_before_event,
|
||||
delta_ids=delta_ids,
|
||||
current_state_ids=current_state_ids,
|
||||
current_state_ids=state_ids_after_event,
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
current_state_ids = prev_state_ids
|
||||
prev_group = entry.prev_group
|
||||
delta_ids = entry.delta_ids
|
||||
|
||||
if entry.state_group is None:
|
||||
entry.state_group = yield self.state_store.store_state_group(
|
||||
event.event_id,
|
||||
event.room_id,
|
||||
prev_group=entry.prev_group,
|
||||
delta_ids=entry.delta_ids,
|
||||
current_state_ids=current_state_ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry.state_id = entry.state_group
|
||||
|
||||
state_group = entry.state_group
|
||||
|
||||
context = EventContext.with_state(
|
||||
state_group=state_group,
|
||||
current_state_ids=current_state_ids,
|
||||
prev_state_ids=prev_state_ids,
|
||||
prev_group=prev_group,
|
||||
return EventContext.with_state(
|
||||
state_group=state_group_after_event,
|
||||
state_group_before_event=state_group_before_event,
|
||||
current_state_ids=state_ids_after_event,
|
||||
prev_state_ids=state_ids_before_event,
|
||||
prev_group=state_group_before_event,
|
||||
delta_ids=delta_ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return context
|
||||
|
||||
@measure_func()
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def resolve_state_groups_for_events(self, room_id, event_ids):
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ class StateStore(StateGroupWorkerStore, StateBackgroundUpdateStore):
|
|||
# if the event was rejected, just give it the same state as its
|
||||
# predecessor.
|
||||
if context.rejected:
|
||||
state_groups[event.event_id] = context.prev_group
|
||||
state_groups[event.event_id] = context.state_group_before_event
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
state_groups[event.event_id] = context.state_group
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -12,13 +12,19 @@
|
|||
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
||||
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
||||
# limitations under the License.
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
|
||||
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes
|
||||
from synapse.api.errors import AuthError, Codes
|
||||
from synapse.federation.federation_base import event_from_pdu_json
|
||||
from synapse.logging.context import LoggingContext, run_in_background
|
||||
from synapse.rest import admin
|
||||
from synapse.rest.client.v1 import login, room
|
||||
|
||||
from tests import unittest
|
||||
|
||||
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class FederationTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
|
||||
servlets = [
|
||||
|
@ -79,3 +85,123 @@ class FederationTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
|
|||
self.assertEqual(failure.code, 403, failure)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(failure.errcode, Codes.FORBIDDEN, failure)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(failure.msg, "You are not invited to this room.")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rejected_message_event_state(self):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Check that we store the state group correctly for rejected non-state events.
|
||||
|
||||
Regression test for #6289.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
OTHER_SERVER = "otherserver"
|
||||
OTHER_USER = "@otheruser:" + OTHER_SERVER
|
||||
|
||||
# create the room
|
||||
user_id = self.register_user("kermit", "test")
|
||||
tok = self.login("kermit", "test")
|
||||
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(room_creator=user_id, tok=tok)
|
||||
|
||||
# pretend that another server has joined
|
||||
join_event = self._build_and_send_join_event(OTHER_SERVER, OTHER_USER, room_id)
|
||||
|
||||
# check the state group
|
||||
sg = self.successResultOf(
|
||||
self.store._get_state_group_for_event(join_event.event_id)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# build and send an event which will be rejected
|
||||
ev = event_from_pdu_json(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": EventTypes.Message,
|
||||
"content": {},
|
||||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||||
"sender": "@yetanotheruser:" + OTHER_SERVER,
|
||||
"depth": join_event["depth"] + 1,
|
||||
"prev_events": [join_event.event_id],
|
||||
"auth_events": [],
|
||||
"origin_server_ts": self.clock.time_msec(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
join_event.format_version,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
with LoggingContext(request="send_rejected"):
|
||||
d = run_in_background(self.handler.on_receive_pdu, OTHER_SERVER, ev)
|
||||
self.get_success(d)
|
||||
|
||||
# that should have been rejected
|
||||
e = self.get_success(self.store.get_event(ev.event_id, allow_rejected=True))
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(e.rejected_reason)
|
||||
|
||||
# ... and the state group should be the same as before
|
||||
sg2 = self.successResultOf(self.store._get_state_group_for_event(ev.event_id))
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sg, sg2)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rejected_state_event_state(self):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Check that we store the state group correctly for rejected state events.
|
||||
|
||||
Regression test for #6289.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
OTHER_SERVER = "otherserver"
|
||||
OTHER_USER = "@otheruser:" + OTHER_SERVER
|
||||
|
||||
# create the room
|
||||
user_id = self.register_user("kermit", "test")
|
||||
tok = self.login("kermit", "test")
|
||||
room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(room_creator=user_id, tok=tok)
|
||||
|
||||
# pretend that another server has joined
|
||||
join_event = self._build_and_send_join_event(OTHER_SERVER, OTHER_USER, room_id)
|
||||
|
||||
# check the state group
|
||||
sg = self.successResultOf(
|
||||
self.store._get_state_group_for_event(join_event.event_id)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# build and send an event which will be rejected
|
||||
ev = event_from_pdu_json(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "org.matrix.test",
|
||||
"state_key": "test_key",
|
||||
"content": {},
|
||||
"room_id": room_id,
|
||||
"sender": "@yetanotheruser:" + OTHER_SERVER,
|
||||
"depth": join_event["depth"] + 1,
|
||||
"prev_events": [join_event.event_id],
|
||||
"auth_events": [],
|
||||
"origin_server_ts": self.clock.time_msec(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
join_event.format_version,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
with LoggingContext(request="send_rejected"):
|
||||
d = run_in_background(self.handler.on_receive_pdu, OTHER_SERVER, ev)
|
||||
self.get_success(d)
|
||||
|
||||
# that should have been rejected
|
||||
e = self.get_success(self.store.get_event(ev.event_id, allow_rejected=True))
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(e.rejected_reason)
|
||||
|
||||
# ... and the state group should be the same as before
|
||||
sg2 = self.successResultOf(self.store._get_state_group_for_event(ev.event_id))
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sg, sg2)
|
||||
|
||||
def _build_and_send_join_event(self, other_server, other_user, room_id):
|
||||
join_event = self.get_success(
|
||||
self.handler.on_make_join_request(other_server, room_id, other_user)
|
||||
)
|
||||
# the auth code requires that a signature exists, but doesn't check that
|
||||
# signature... go figure.
|
||||
join_event.signatures[other_server] = {"x": "y"}
|
||||
with LoggingContext(request="send_join"):
|
||||
d = run_in_background(
|
||||
self.handler.on_send_join_request, other_server, join_event
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.get_success(d)
|
||||
|
||||
# sanity-check: the room should show that the new user is a member
|
||||
r = self.get_success(self.store.get_current_state_ids(room_id))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(r[(EventTypes.Member, other_user)], join_event.event_id)
|
||||
|
||||
return join_event
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ from synapse.api.auth import Auth
|
|||
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes, Membership
|
||||
from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions
|
||||
from synapse.events import FrozenEvent
|
||||
from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext
|
||||
from synapse.state import StateHandler, StateResolutionHandler
|
||||
|
||||
from tests import unittest
|
||||
|
@ -198,16 +199,22 @@ class StateTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
self.store.register_events(graph.walk())
|
||||
|
||||
context_store = {}
|
||||
context_store = {} # type: dict[str, EventContext]
|
||||
|
||||
for event in graph.walk():
|
||||
context = yield self.state.compute_event_context(event)
|
||||
self.store.register_event_context(event, context)
|
||||
context_store[event.event_id] = context
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield context_store["D"].get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
ctx_c = context_store["C"]
|
||||
ctx_d = context_store["D"]
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield ctx_d.get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(2, len(prev_state_ids))
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ctx_c.state_group, ctx_d.state_group_before_event)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ctx_d.state_group_before_event, ctx_d.state_group)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def test_branch_basic_conflict(self):
|
||||
graph = Graph(
|
||||
|
@ -241,12 +248,19 @@ class StateTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
self.store.register_event_context(event, context)
|
||||
context_store[event.event_id] = context
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield context_store["D"].get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
# C ends up winning the resolution between B and C
|
||||
|
||||
ctx_c = context_store["C"]
|
||||
ctx_d = context_store["D"]
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield ctx_d.get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
self.assertSetEqual(
|
||||
{"START", "A", "C"}, {e_id for e_id in prev_state_ids.values()}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ctx_c.state_group, ctx_d.state_group_before_event)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ctx_d.state_group_before_event, ctx_d.state_group)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def test_branch_have_banned_conflict(self):
|
||||
graph = Graph(
|
||||
|
@ -292,11 +306,18 @@ class StateTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
self.store.register_event_context(event, context)
|
||||
context_store[event.event_id] = context
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield context_store["E"].get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
# C ends up winning the resolution between C and D because bans win over other
|
||||
# changes
|
||||
|
||||
ctx_c = context_store["C"]
|
||||
ctx_e = context_store["E"]
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield ctx_e.get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
self.assertSetEqual(
|
||||
{"START", "A", "B", "C"}, {e for e in prev_state_ids.values()}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ctx_c.state_group, ctx_e.state_group_before_event)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ctx_e.state_group_before_event, ctx_e.state_group)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def test_branch_have_perms_conflict(self):
|
||||
|
@ -360,12 +381,20 @@ class StateTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
self.store.register_event_context(event, context)
|
||||
context_store[event.event_id] = context
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield context_store["D"].get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
# B ends up winning the resolution between B and C because power levels
|
||||
# win over other changes.
|
||||
|
||||
ctx_b = context_store["B"]
|
||||
ctx_d = context_store["D"]
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield ctx_d.get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
self.assertSetEqual(
|
||||
{"A1", "A2", "A3", "A5", "B"}, {e for e in prev_state_ids.values()}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ctx_b.state_group, ctx_d.state_group_before_event)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ctx_d.state_group_before_event, ctx_d.state_group)
|
||||
|
||||
def _add_depths(self, nodes, edges):
|
||||
def _get_depth(ev):
|
||||
node = nodes[ev]
|
||||
|
@ -390,13 +419,16 @@ class StateTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
context = yield self.state.compute_event_context(event, old_state=old_state)
|
||||
|
||||
current_state_ids = yield context.get_current_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield context.get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
self.assertCountEqual((e.event_id for e in old_state), prev_state_ids.values())
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
set(e.event_id for e in old_state), set(current_state_ids.values())
|
||||
current_state_ids = yield context.get_current_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
self.assertCountEqual(
|
||||
(e.event_id for e in old_state), current_state_ids.values()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(context.state_group)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(context.state_group_before_event)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(context.state_group_before_event, context.state_group)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def test_annotate_with_old_state(self):
|
||||
|
@ -411,11 +443,18 @@ class StateTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
context = yield self.state.compute_event_context(event, old_state=old_state)
|
||||
|
||||
prev_state_ids = yield context.get_prev_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
self.assertCountEqual((e.event_id for e in old_state), prev_state_ids.values())
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
set(e.event_id for e in old_state), set(prev_state_ids.values())
|
||||
current_state_ids = yield context.get_current_state_ids(self.store)
|
||||
self.assertCountEqual(
|
||||
(e.event_id for e in old_state + [event]), current_state_ids.values()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(context.state_group_before_event)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(context.state_group_before_event, context.state_group)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(context.state_group_before_event, context.prev_group)
|
||||
self.assertEqual({("state", ""): event.event_id}, context.delta_ids)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def test_trivial_annotate_message(self):
|
||||
prev_event_id = "prev_event_id"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue