Make adding push rules idempotent
Also remove the **kwargs from the add_push_rule method. Fixes https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SYN-391
This commit is contained in:
parent
a182e5d721
commit
a9c9868957
|
@ -99,38 +99,36 @@ class PushRuleStore(SQLBaseStore):
|
||||||
results.setdefault(row['user_name'], {})[row['rule_id']] = row['enabled']
|
results.setdefault(row['user_name'], {})[row['rule_id']] = row['enabled']
|
||||||
defer.returnValue(results)
|
defer.returnValue(results)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
def add_push_rule(
|
||||||
def add_push_rule(self, before, after, **kwargs):
|
self, user_id, rule_id, priority_class, conditions, actions,
|
||||||
vals = kwargs
|
before=None, after=None
|
||||||
if 'conditions' in vals:
|
):
|
||||||
vals['conditions'] = json.dumps(vals['conditions'])
|
conditions_json = json.dumps(conditions)
|
||||||
if 'actions' in vals:
|
actions_json = json.dumps(actions)
|
||||||
vals['actions'] = json.dumps(vals['actions'])
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# we could check the rest of the keys are valid column names
|
|
||||||
# but sqlite will do that anyway so I think it's just pointless.
|
|
||||||
vals.pop("id", None)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if before or after:
|
if before or after:
|
||||||
ret = yield self.runInteraction(
|
return self.runInteraction(
|
||||||
"_add_push_rule_relative_txn",
|
"_add_push_rule_relative_txn",
|
||||||
self._add_push_rule_relative_txn,
|
self._add_push_rule_relative_txn,
|
||||||
before=before,
|
user_id, rule_id, priority_class,
|
||||||
after=after,
|
conditions_json, actions_json, before, after,
|
||||||
**vals
|
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
defer.returnValue(ret)
|
|
||||||
else:
|
else:
|
||||||
ret = yield self.runInteraction(
|
return self.runInteraction(
|
||||||
"_add_push_rule_highest_priority_txn",
|
"_add_push_rule_highest_priority_txn",
|
||||||
self._add_push_rule_highest_priority_txn,
|
self._add_push_rule_highest_priority_txn,
|
||||||
**vals
|
user_id, rule_id, priority_class,
|
||||||
|
conditions_json, actions_json,
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
defer.returnValue(ret)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _add_push_rule_relative_txn(self, txn, user_id, **kwargs):
|
def _add_push_rule_relative_txn(
|
||||||
after = kwargs.pop("after", None)
|
self, txn, user_id, rule_id, priority_class,
|
||||||
before = kwargs.pop("before", None)
|
conditions_json, actions_json, before, after
|
||||||
|
):
|
||||||
|
# Lock the table since otherwise we'll have annoying races between the
|
||||||
|
# SELECT here and the UPSERT below.
|
||||||
|
self.database_engine.lock_table(txn, "push_rules")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
relative_to_rule = before or after
|
relative_to_rule = before or after
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
res = self._simple_select_one_txn(
|
res = self._simple_select_one_txn(
|
||||||
|
@ -149,69 +147,45 @@ class PushRuleStore(SQLBaseStore):
|
||||||
"before/after rule not found: %s" % (relative_to_rule,)
|
"before/after rule not found: %s" % (relative_to_rule,)
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
priority_class = res["priority_class"]
|
base_priority_class = res["priority_class"]
|
||||||
base_rule_priority = res["priority"]
|
base_rule_priority = res["priority"]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if 'priority_class' in kwargs and kwargs['priority_class'] != priority_class:
|
if base_priority_class != priority_class:
|
||||||
raise InconsistentRuleException(
|
raise InconsistentRuleException(
|
||||||
"Given priority class does not match class of relative rule"
|
"Given priority class does not match class of relative rule"
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
new_rule = kwargs
|
if before:
|
||||||
new_rule.pop("before", None)
|
# Higher priority rules are executed first, So adding a rule before
|
||||||
new_rule.pop("after", None)
|
# a rule means giving it a higher priority than that rule.
|
||||||
new_rule['priority_class'] = priority_class
|
new_rule_priority = base_rule_priority + 1
|
||||||
new_rule['user_name'] = user_id
|
|
||||||
new_rule['id'] = self._push_rule_id_gen.get_next_txn(txn)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# check if the priority before/after is free
|
|
||||||
new_rule_priority = base_rule_priority
|
|
||||||
if after:
|
|
||||||
new_rule_priority -= 1
|
|
||||||
else:
|
else:
|
||||||
new_rule_priority += 1
|
# We increment the priority of the existing rules to make space for
|
||||||
|
# the new rule. Therefore if we want this rule to appear after
|
||||||
new_rule['priority'] = new_rule_priority
|
# an existing rule we give it the priority of the existing rule,
|
||||||
|
# and then increment the priority of the existing rule.
|
||||||
|
new_rule_priority = base_rule_priority
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
sql = (
|
sql = (
|
||||||
"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM push_rules"
|
"UPDATE push_rules SET priority = priority + 1"
|
||||||
" WHERE user_name = ? AND priority_class = ? AND priority = ?"
|
" WHERE user_name = ? AND priority_class = ? AND priority >= ?"
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
txn.execute(sql, (user_id, priority_class, new_rule_priority))
|
txn.execute(sql, (user_id, priority_class, new_rule_priority))
|
||||||
res = txn.fetchall()
|
|
||||||
num_conflicting = res[0][0]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# if there are conflicting rules, bump everything
|
self._upsert_push_rule_txn(
|
||||||
if num_conflicting:
|
txn, user_id, rule_id, priority_class, new_rule_priority,
|
||||||
sql = "UPDATE push_rules SET priority = priority "
|
conditions_json, actions_json,
|
||||||
if after:
|
|
||||||
sql += "-1"
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
sql += "+1"
|
|
||||||
sql += " WHERE user_name = ? AND priority_class = ? AND priority "
|
|
||||||
if after:
|
|
||||||
sql += "<= ?"
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
sql += ">= ?"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
txn.execute(sql, (user_id, priority_class, new_rule_priority))
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
txn.call_after(
|
|
||||||
self.get_push_rules_for_user.invalidate, (user_id,)
|
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
txn.call_after(
|
def _add_push_rule_highest_priority_txn(
|
||||||
self.get_push_rules_enabled_for_user.invalidate, (user_id,)
|
self, txn, user_id, rule_id, priority_class,
|
||||||
)
|
conditions_json, actions_json
|
||||||
|
):
|
||||||
|
# Lock the table since otherwise we'll have annoying races between the
|
||||||
|
# SELECT here and the UPSERT below.
|
||||||
|
self.database_engine.lock_table(txn, "push_rules")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
self._simple_insert_txn(
|
|
||||||
txn,
|
|
||||||
table="push_rules",
|
|
||||||
values=new_rule,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _add_push_rule_highest_priority_txn(self, txn, user_id,
|
|
||||||
priority_class, **kwargs):
|
|
||||||
# find the highest priority rule in that class
|
# find the highest priority rule in that class
|
||||||
sql = (
|
sql = (
|
||||||
"SELECT COUNT(*), MAX(priority) FROM push_rules"
|
"SELECT COUNT(*), MAX(priority) FROM push_rules"
|
||||||
|
@ -225,12 +199,48 @@ class PushRuleStore(SQLBaseStore):
|
||||||
if how_many > 0:
|
if how_many > 0:
|
||||||
new_prio = highest_prio + 1
|
new_prio = highest_prio + 1
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# and insert the new rule
|
self._upsert_push_rule_txn(
|
||||||
new_rule = kwargs
|
txn,
|
||||||
new_rule['id'] = self._push_rule_id_gen.get_next_txn(txn)
|
user_id, rule_id, priority_class, new_prio,
|
||||||
new_rule['user_name'] = user_id
|
conditions_json, actions_json,
|
||||||
new_rule['priority_class'] = priority_class
|
)
|
||||||
new_rule['priority'] = new_prio
|
|
||||||
|
def _upsert_push_rule_txn(
|
||||||
|
self, txn, user_id, rule_id, priority_class,
|
||||||
|
priority, conditions_json, actions_json
|
||||||
|
):
|
||||||
|
"""Specialised version of _simple_upsert_txn that picks a push_rule_id
|
||||||
|
using the _push_rule_id_gen if it needs to insert the rule. It assumes
|
||||||
|
that the "push_rules" table is locked"""
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
sql = (
|
||||||
|
"UPDATE push_rules"
|
||||||
|
" SET priority_class = ?, priority = ?, conditions = ?, actions = ?"
|
||||||
|
" WHERE user_name = ? AND rule_id = ?"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
txn.execute(sql, (
|
||||||
|
priority_class, priority, conditions_json, actions_json,
|
||||||
|
user_id, rule_id,
|
||||||
|
))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if txn.rowcount == 0:
|
||||||
|
# We didn't update a row with the given rule_id so insert one
|
||||||
|
push_rule_id = self._push_rule_id_gen.get_next_txn(txn)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
self._simple_insert_txn(
|
||||||
|
txn,
|
||||||
|
table="push_rules",
|
||||||
|
values={
|
||||||
|
"id": push_rule_id,
|
||||||
|
"user_name": user_id,
|
||||||
|
"rule_id": rule_id,
|
||||||
|
"priority_class": priority_class,
|
||||||
|
"priority": priority,
|
||||||
|
"conditions": conditions_json,
|
||||||
|
"actions": actions_json,
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
txn.call_after(
|
txn.call_after(
|
||||||
self.get_push_rules_for_user.invalidate, (user_id,)
|
self.get_push_rules_for_user.invalidate, (user_id,)
|
||||||
|
@ -239,12 +249,6 @@ class PushRuleStore(SQLBaseStore):
|
||||||
self.get_push_rules_enabled_for_user.invalidate, (user_id,)
|
self.get_push_rules_enabled_for_user.invalidate, (user_id,)
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
self._simple_insert_txn(
|
|
||||||
txn,
|
|
||||||
table="push_rules",
|
|
||||||
values=new_rule,
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||||
def delete_push_rule(self, user_id, rule_id):
|
def delete_push_rule(self, user_id, rule_id):
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue