This is basically exactly the same logic as for receipts. Essentially we
just need to track which room account data we have and haven't sent down
to clients, and use that when we pull stuff out.
I think this just needs a couple of extra tests written
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <eric.eastwood@beta.gouv.fr>
Performance optimization: We can avoid fetching rooms that the user has
left themselves (which could be a significant amount), then only add
back rooms that the user has `newly_left` (left in the token range of an
incremental sync). It's a lot faster to fetch less rooms than fetch them
all and throw them away in most cases. Since the user only leaves a room
(or is state reset out) once in a blue moon, we can avoid a lot of work.
Based on @erikjohnston's branch, erikj/ss_perf
---------
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <erik@matrix.org>
Add cache to `get_tags_for_room(...)`
This helps Sliding Sync because `get_tags_for_room(...)` is going to be
used in https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17695
Essentially, we're just trying to match `get_account_data_for_room(...)`
which already has a tree cache.
No need to sort if the range is large enough to cover all of the rooms
in the list. Previously, we would only do this optimization if the range
was exactly large enough.
Follow-up to https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17672
This appears to be enough to make Element Web work (or at least move it
on to the next hurdle)
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <eric.eastwood@beta.gouv.fr>
Move filters tests to rest layer in order to test the new (with sliding
sync tables) and fallback paths that Sliding Sync can use.
Also found a bug in the new path because it's not being tested which is
also fixed in this PR. We now take into account `has_known_state` when
filtering.
Spawning from
https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17662#discussion_r1755574791.
This should have been done when we started using the new sliding sync
tables in https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17630
This PR changes `from pydantic import BaseModel` to `from
synapse._pydantic_compat import BaseModel` (as well as `constr`,
`conbytes`, `conint`, `confloat`).
It allows `check_pydantic_models.py` to mock those pydantic objects only
in the synapse module, and not interfere with pydantic objects in
external dependencies.
This should solve the CI problems for #17144, which breaks because
`check_pydantic_models.py` patches pydantic models from
[scim2-models](https://scim2-models.readthedocs.io/).
/cc @DMRobertson @gotmax23
fixes#17659
### Pull Request Checklist
<!-- Please read
https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html
before submitting your pull request -->
* [x] Pull request is based on the develop branch
* [x] Pull request includes a [changelog
file](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#changelog).
The entry should:
- Be a short description of your change which makes sense to users.
"Fixed a bug that prevented receiving messages from other servers."
instead of "Moved X method from `EventStore` to `EventWorkerStore`.".
- Use markdown where necessary, mostly for `code blocks`.
- End with either a period (.) or an exclamation mark (!).
- Start with a capital letter.
- Feel free to credit yourself, by adding a sentence "Contributed by
@github_username." or "Contributed by [Your Name]." to the end of the
entry.
* [x] [Code
style](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/code_style.html) is
correct
(run the
[linters](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#run-the-linters))
We need to bust the `get_sliding_sync_rooms_for_user`
cache when the room encryption is updated and any
other field that is used in the query.
Follow-up to https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17630
- Bust cache for membership change (cross-reference
`get_rooms_for_user`)
- Bust cache for room `encryption` (cross-reference
`get_room_encryption`)
- Bust cache for `forgotten` (cross-reference
`did_forget`/`get_forgotten_rooms_for_user`)
For rooms with a name we can skip fetching a full room summary, as we
don't need to calculate heroes, and instead just fetch the room counts
directly.
This also changes things to not return counts and heroes for non-joined
rooms. For left/banned rooms we were returning zero values anyway, and
for invite/knock rooms we don't really want to leak such information
(even if some of is included in the stripped state).
For rooms with a name we can skip fetching a full room summary, as we
don't need to calculate heroes, and instead just fetch the room counts
directly.
This also changes things to not return counts and heroes for non-joined
rooms. For left/banned rooms we were returning zero values anyway, and
for invite/knock rooms we don't really want to leak such information
(even if some of is included in the stripped state).
Erik Johnston