From e3cead085a7c049c5616c616d0d497b746d2f951 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gorhill Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:05:22 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ... --- README.md | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index cd62a44e8..6bcd70ece 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -16,14 +16,16 @@ garbage collector kicks in. #### New myths flying around - "µBlock does not support element hiding". - -Yes it does. If you don't believe it, try entering `twitter.com##body` in the + - Yes it does. If you don't believe it, try entering `twitter.com##body` in the _"Your filters"_ text area and see what happens when you visit twitter.com... - - "The memory usage isn't actually ABP's fault, _EasyList_ is like 40,000+ lines of rules that all have to be parsed by ABP". + - Hum, µBlock also parse _EasyList_. And _EasyPrivacy_. And _Malware domains_ lists. +And _Peter Lowes's Ad server_ list. Out of the box. Yet uses less than half the +memory of ABP. -Hum, µBlock also parse _EasyList_. And _EasyPrivacy_. And _Malware domains_ lists. -And _Peter Lowes's Ad server_ list. Out of the box. Yet uses half the memory of ABP. +And for a fun memory test, you can try yourself the +[infamous vim test](https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard/wiki/Adblock-Plus-memory-consumption), +once with only ABP as the active extension, and once as only µBlock as the active extension. #### Regarding reviews in various web store