From 271fe727a02fd0566753ff338e9a4a7f1ef5b8aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hill Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:47:23 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Doesn't uBlock Origin add overhead to page load? (markdown) --- Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md b/Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md index dd29b3d..8eff23d 100644 --- a/Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md +++ b/Doesn't-uBlock-Origin-add-overhead-to-page-load?.md @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -**TL;DR:** if you worry about uBO's added overhead for non-bloated sites, just [disable cosmetic filtering](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Per-site-switches#no-cosmetic-filtering) on a per-site basis, it is the optimal approach: this will keep you protected security- and privacy-wise while minimizing the added overhead. +**TL;DR:** if you worry about uBO's added overhead for non-bloated sites, just [disable cosmetic filtering](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Per-site-switches#no-cosmetic-filtering) on a per-site basis, it is the optimal approach: this will keep you protected security- and privacy-wise (as far as your filters/rules allow) while minimizing the added overhead. ***