Mirrors
/
uBlock
mirror of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Updated Dynamic filtering examples (markdown)

gorhill 2014-10-08 09:11:02 -07:00
parent 19e181a66c
commit 40074c6200
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
Dynamic-filtering---examples.md

@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
<img align="right" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/dynamic-filtering-4.png" />Dynamic filtering can be used to block much more aggressively than what would normally happen when relying only on the default filter lists. With dynamic filtering, web pages are definitely more likely to break, but for many users this is acceptable, so long as the content of a web page can still be read.
Dynamic filtering can be used to block much more aggressively than what would normally happen when relying only on the default filter lists. With dynamic filtering, web pages are definitely more likely to break, but for many users this is acceptable, so long as the content of a web page can still be read.
Following are some examples of using dynamic filtering vs. not using dynamic filtering (i.e. relying solely on the static filter lists), with both scenarios using the default filter lists. The top row in each table shows the used bandwidth.
<p align="center"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/dynamic-filtering-4.png" /><br><sup>3rd-party scripts and 3rd-party frames blocked.</sup></p>
I didn't report below the comparative results without a blocker, that would be a lot of noise detracting from the main topic here, but I provide a summary of what would have happened without µBlock with default filter lists. (That is with click-to-play enabled for plugins -- it would be much worst without this.)
I used my [HAR parser](http://raymondhill.net/httpsb/har-parser.html) tool to extract the results.