mirror of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock.git
Updated Debunking "uBlock Origin is less efficient than Adguard" claims (markdown)
parent
c00ff8af9f
commit
5739e45874
|
@ -72,4 +72,4 @@ Memory usage after all tabs loaded (see pic, top is after browser launch + garba
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Conclusion:
|
### Conclusion:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Both extensions use essentially the same code on Microsoft Edge as they do on Chromium, so it is expected they will have the same performance outcome. Given that uBlock Origin consumes 1/3 of CPU cycles to actually accomplish more than Adguard (uBO's defaults includes Peter Lowe's and malware lists), to claim that the results are completely reversed on Microsoft Edge is an extraordinary claim, and thus needs to be substantiated by more than just a completely subjective and data-less assessment such as "methodology is real life usage".
|
Both extensions use essentially the same code on Microsoft Edge as they do on Chromium, so it is expected they will have the same relative performance outcome. Given that uBlock Origin consumes 1/3 of CPU cycles to actually accomplish more than Adguard (uBO's defaults includes Peter Lowe's and malware lists), to claim that the results are completely reversed on Microsoft Edge is an extraordinary claim, and thus needs to be substantiated by more than just a completely subjective and data-less assessment such as "methodology is real life usage".
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue