From 82a159a3ed25d4bd3f19fec0ff03f4aef23f01d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gorhill Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:05:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Notes on memory benchmarks, selfies (markdown) --- ...hmarks, selfies.md => Notes-on-memory-benchmarks,-selfies.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename Notes on memory benchmarks, selfies.md => Notes-on-memory-benchmarks,-selfies.md (93%) diff --git a/Notes on memory benchmarks, selfies.md b/Notes-on-memory-benchmarks,-selfies.md similarity index 93% rename from Notes on memory benchmarks, selfies.md rename to Notes-on-memory-benchmarks,-selfies.md index 7cedf0c..9b240f4 100644 --- a/Notes on memory benchmarks, selfies.md +++ b/Notes-on-memory-benchmarks,-selfies.md @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Additionally, with version 0.6+, µBlock is able to create a selfie to improve i The time at which a selfie is created is at µBlock's discretion. Currently, this will happen some minutes after the filter lists have been loaded, so as to avoid launching memory-churning selfie creation operations before there is a good likelihood the user is done tampering with his selection of filters. -Take note that all the benchmarks appearing on the main page are quite dated at this point, a lot of code has been added or changed in µBlock. So for version 0.6 I ran the reference benchmark to find out where µBlock stands memory efficiency-wise -- along with ABP 1.8.3 for comparison. +Take note that all the benchmarks appearing on the main page are quite dated at this point, a lot of code has been added or changed in µBlock, and the filter lists themselves may have grown since then (I have to check). So for version 0.6 I ran the reference benchmark to find out where µBlock stands memory efficiency-wise -- along with ABP 1.8.3 for comparison. Without a selfie available (one was created during the benchmark):
![Without selfie](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/img/ublock-vs-abp-memory-201409-a.png)