From 9e4e8621ada8d4e3b62573dc02d72f3795cad36d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gwarser Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:28:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Procedural cosmetic filters (markdown) --- Procedural-cosmetic-filters.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Procedural-cosmetic-filters.md b/Procedural-cosmetic-filters.md index 209aa47..9db23e7 100644 --- a/Procedural-cosmetic-filters.md +++ b/Procedural-cosmetic-filters.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ The concept of procedural cosmetic filtering was introduced with uBlock Origin ("uBO") [version 1.8.0](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases/tag/1.8.0). -The initial implementation was revised to allow chained/recursive use of the procedural operators with version [1.11.0](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases/tag/1.11.0)+. There is no limit on the number of operators chained, or the number of recursion level, aside common sense. Though, chaining to native CSS selector after procedural one was not supported before 1.17.5rc1. As a reminder, use procedural cosmetic filters only for when plain CSS selectors won't solve a case. +The initial implementation was revised to allow chained/recursive use of the procedural operators with version [1.11.0](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases/tag/1.11.0)+. There is no limit on the number of operators chained, or the number of recursion level, aside common sense. Though, chaining to native CSS selector after procedural one was not supported before [1.17.5rc1](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/commit/8a88e9d93174badd6855c0e782737158c9ccd6f8). As a reminder, use procedural cosmetic filters only for when plain CSS selectors won't solve a case. Normal, standard cosmetic filters are _declarative_, i.e. they are used as selector in a CSS rule, and completely handled by browsers through `style` tag elements.