Backport #24751 by @wxiaoguang
Make mailer SMTP check have timed context
Otherwise Gitea may block for long time if the DNS request blocks.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #24470Fixes#24145
---
To solve the bug, I added a "computed" `TargetBehind` field to the
`Release` model, which indicates the target branch of a release. This is
particularly useful if the target branch was deleted in the meantime (or
is empty).
I also did a micro-optimization in `calReleaseNumCommitsBehind`. Instead
of checking that a branch exists and then call `GetBranchCommit`, I
immediately call `GetBranchCommit` and handle the `git.ErrNotExist`
error.
This optimization is covered by the added unit test.
_contributed in the context of @forgejo_
Backport #24231 by @sillyguodong
Close#24213
Replace #23830
#### Cause
- Before, in order to making PR can get latest commit after reopening,
the `ref`(${REPO_PATH}/refs/pull/${PR_INDEX}/head) of evrey closed PR
will be updated when pushing commits to the `head branch` of the closed
PR.
#### Changes
- For closed PR , won't perform these behavior: insert`comment`, push
`notification` (UI and email), exectue
[pushToBaseRepo](7422503341/services/pull/pull.go (L409))
function and trigger `action` any more when pushing to the `head branch`
of the closed PR.
- Refresh the reference of the PR when reopening the closed PR (**even
if the head branch has been deleted before**). Make the reference of PR
consistent with the `head branch`.
Co-authored-by: sillyguodong <33891828+sillyguodong@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #24573
Help some users like #16832#1851
There are many users reporting similar problem: if the SECRET_KEY
mismatches, some operations (like 2FA login) only reports unclear 500
error and unclear "base64 decode error" log （some maintainers ever spent
a lot of time on debugging such problem)
The SECRET_KEY was not well-designed and it is also a kind of technical
debt. Since it couldn't be fixed easily, it's good to add clearer error
messages, then at least users could know what the real problem is.
Backport #24536 by @sillyguodong
close#24449
The unit of `Actions` should be contorlled not only by
`repository.DISABLED_REPO_UNITS` but also by `actions.ENABLED`
in the `app.ini`.
Previously, the permission of the team's `Actions` unit was not
controlled by `actions.Enabled`. So, even if the user sets
`actions.Enabled` to false, he can still select the permission of the
`Actions` unit for the team.
This PR makes the permissions of the team's `Actions` unit also
controlled by `actions.Enabled`. Just append`TypeActions` into
`DisabledRepoUnits` slice when initializing if `actions.Enabled` is
false.
### Changes:
If `Actions` is set disbaled in `app.ini`, like below:
```yaml
[actions]
ENABLED = false
```
1. If user try to create/edit a team, will prompt user that `Actions` is
disbaled.
2. `actions` is not displayed in the sidebar on the team details page
Co-authored-by: sillyguodong <33891828+sillyguodong@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #23062
Backport #24515Fix#23617
This notably brings support for GOARCH=loong64, among other fixes.
This PR also fix bleve search architecture problem.
---------
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org>
Co-authored-by: WÁNG Xuěruì <1175567+xen0n@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Backport #24487 by @fnetX
On the @Forgejo instance of Codeberg, we discovered that forking a repo
which is already forked now returns a 500 Internal Server Error, which
is unexpected. This is an attempt at fixing this.
The error message in the log:
~~~
2023/05/02 08:36:30 .../api/v1/repo/fork.go:147:CreateFork() [E]
[6450cb8e-113] ForkRepository: repository is already forked by user
[uname: ...., repo path: .../..., fork path: .../...]
~~~
The service that is used for forking returns a custom error message
which is not checked against.
About the order of options:
The case that the fork already exists should be more common, followed by
the case that a repo with the same name already exists for other
reasons. The case that the global repo limit is hit is probably not the
likeliest.
---------
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter (fnetX) <git@fralix.ovh>
Backport #24382 by @lunny
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24362/files#r1179095324
`getAuthenticatedMeta` has checked them, these code are duplicated one.
And the first invokation has a wrong permission check. `DownloadHandle`
should require read permission but not write.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #24362 by @jolheiser
> The scoped token PR just checked all API routes but in fact, some web
routes like `LFS`, git `HTTP`, container, and attachments supports basic
auth. This PR added scoped token check for them.
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #24339 by @yardenshoham
I made it render the script even if the repo is archived
- Fixes#24324
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Backport #24307Fix#24305
According to MDN, "bold" starts from 700, some fonts do not provide
"bolding" for weight 600
Manually backport, no CSS conflict.
Backport #24035 by @garymoon
This change prevents Gitea from bypassing the manual approval process
for newly registered users when OIDC is used.
- Resolves https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/23392
Signed-off-by: Gary Moon <gary@garymoon.net>
Co-authored-by: Gary Moon <garymoon@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #24116 by @techknowlogick
Proposal found here: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/23654
TODO: make non-breaking (can we publish docker image using dev and
nightly prefix? at same time). if anyone has advice please comment :)
If this PR is merged, then I can add redirects to the downloads site.
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
wxiaoguang
