Backport #29531 by wxiaoguang
Add two "HTMLURL" methods for PackageDescriptor.
And rename "FullWebLink" to "VersionWebLink"
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #29535 by wxiaoguang
* `$referenceUrl`: it is constructed by "Issue.Link", which already has
the "AppSubURL"
* `window.location.href`: AppSubURL could be empty string, so it needs
the trailing slash
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #29525 by @wxiaoguang
* Follow #17746: `HasIssueContentHistory` should use expr builder to
make sure zero value (0) be respected.
* Add "doer" check to make sure `canSoftDeleteContentHistory` only be
called by sign-in users.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #29459 by @KN4CK3R
The tests use an invalid `setting.AppSubURL`. The wrong behaviour
disturbs other PRs like #29222 and #29427.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #29407 by @silverwind
- `e.error` can be undefined in some cases which would raise an error
inside this error handler, fixed that.
- The displayed message mentions looking into the console, but in my
case of error from `ResizeObserver` there was nothing there, so add this
logging. I think this logging was once there but got lost during
refactoring.
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #29448 by @charles7668
issue : #28239
The counter number script uses the 'checkbox' attribute to determine
whether an item is selected or not.
However, the input event only increments the counter value, and when
more items are displayed, it does not update all previously loaded
items.
As a result, the display becomes incorrect because it triggers the
update counter script, but checkboxes that are selected without the
'checked' attribute are not counted
Co-authored-by: charles <30816317+charles7668@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #29467 by @Zettat123
1. Fix incorrect `HookEventType` for issue-related events in
`IssueChangeAssignee`
2. Add `case "types"` in the `switch` block in `matchPullRequestEvent`
to avoid warning logs
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Backport #29470 by @silverwind
Ported the function as-is and added comments so we don't forget about
this in the future.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/29462
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #29439 by @sillyguodong
Previously, it will be treated as "re-run all jobs" when `jobIndex ==
0`. So when you click re-run button on the first job, it triggers all
the jobs actually.
Caused by #26535.
Co-authored-by: sillyguodong <33891828+sillyguodong@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #29377 by wxiaoguang
Regression of #18718. When submitting the form,
EditRepoFileForm.TreePath is marked as "Required", so the value can't be
empty. The value is not used by backend, so use a meaningful dummy value
for it.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #27263 by @lunny
This PR will also keep the consistent between list assigned users and
check assigned users.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #29105
`ctx.Error` only displays the text but `ctx.ServerError` renders the
usual error page.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #29047
Add more details for the docker tag when using container registry.
Co-authored-by: wienans <40465543+wienans@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #29347 by @carlosfelgueiras
Fixes#27188.
Introduces a check on the installation that tries to parse the FROM
address. If it fails, shows a new error message to the user.
Co-authored-by: Carlos Felgueiras <carlosfelgueiras@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
The submitted tests in the patch for the XSS fix is not right.
To test, it should test "what should happen", but not "what doesn't
exist" or "what is processed/decoded".
Backport #29342 by @Zettat123
Fix#29249
~~Use the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/archive/{archive}` API to download.~~
Apply #26430 to archive download URLs.
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
When releasing, the releaser should read all the pull requests carefully
and do some adjustments because some of pull requests' labels are not
right when it's merged.
And the changelog tool needs to be adjusted. If one pull request has
both `bug` and `API`, it should mark it as `bug` but not `API`.
- The Wiki page did not sanitize author name
- the reviewer name on a "dismiss review" comment is also affected
- the migration page has some spots
---------
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Backport #29295 by @lunny
Fix#28843
This PR will bypass the pushUpdateTag to database failure when
syncAllTags. An error log will be recorded.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes#28945
Backport #28948
Setting the avatar is wrong and creating a random password is equal to
leave it empty.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #29277 by @Zettat123
Fix#29175
Replace #29207
This PR makes some improvements to the `issue_comment` workflow trigger
event.
1. Fix the bug that pull requests cannot trigger `issue_comment`
workflows
2. Previously the `issue_comment` event only supported the `created`
activity type. This PR adds support for the missing `edited` and
`deleted` activity types.
3. Some events (including `issue_comment`, `issues`, etc. ) only trigger
workflows that belong to the workflow file on the default branch. This
PR introduces the `IsDefaultBranchWorkflow` function to check for these
events.
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Backport #29297 by @KN4CK3R
Fixes#29101
Related #29298
Discard all read data to prevent misinterpreting existing data. Some
discard calls were missing in error cases.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Backport #29173Fix#29166
Add support for the following activity types of `pull_request`
- assigned
- unassigned
- review_requested
- review_request_removed
- milestoned
- demilestoned
Backport #29298
Fixes the reason why #29101 is hard to replicate.
Related #29297
Create a repo with a file with minimum size 4097 bytes (I use 10000) and
execute the following code:
```go
gitRepo, err := gitrepo.OpenRepository(db.DefaultContext, <repo>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(<sha>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
entry, err := commit.GetTreeEntryByPath(<file>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
b := entry.Blob()
// Create a reader
r, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err)
defer r.Close()
// Create a second reader
r2, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err) // Should be no error but is ErrNotExist
defer r2.Close()
```
The problem is the check in `CatFileBatch`:
79217ea63c/modules/git/repo_base_nogogit.go (L81-L87)
`Buffered() > 0` is used to check if there is a "operation" in progress
at the moment. This is a problem because we can't control the internal
buffer in the `bufio.Reader`. The code above demonstrates a sequence
which initiates an operation for which the code thinks there is no
active processing. The second call to `DataAsync()` therefore reuses the
existing instances instead of creating a new batch reader.
Giteabot