Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30296
- Adds a DB fixture for actions artifacts
- Adds artifacts test files
- Clears artifacts test files between each run
- Note: I initially initialized the artifacts only for artifacts tests,
but because the files are small it only takes ~8ms, so I changed it to
always run in test setup for simplicity
- Fix some otherwise flaky tests by making them not depend on previous
tests
Fix#28121
I did some tests and found that the `missing signature key` error is
caused by an incorrect `Content-Type` header. Gitea correctly sets the
`Content-Type` header when serving files.
348d1d0f32/routers/api/packages/container/container.go (L712-L717)
However, when `SERVE_DIRECT` is enabled, the `Content-Type` header may
be set to an incorrect value by the storage service. To fix this issue,
we can use query parameters to override response header values.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/API_GetObject.html
<img width="600px"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f2ff90f0-f1df-46f9-9680-b8120222c555"
/>
In this PR, I introduced a new parameter to the `URL` method to support
additional parameters.
```
URL(path, name string, reqParams url.Values) (*url.URL, error)
```
---
Most S3-like services support specifying the content type when storing
objects. However, Gitea always use `application/octet-stream`.
Therefore, I believe we also need to improve the `Save` method to
support storing objects with the correct content type.
b7fb20e73e/modules/storage/minio.go (L214-L221)
- Prefer
[window.location.assign](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Location/assign)
over assigning to
[window.location](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/location)
which typescript does not like. This works in all browsers including
PaleMoon.
- Fix all typescript issues in `web_src/js/webcomponents`, no behaviour
changes.
- ~~Workaround bug in `@typescript-eslint/no-unnecessary-type-assertion`
rule.~~
- Omit vendored file from type checks.
- `tsc` error count is reduce by 53 with these changes.
This contains two backwards-compatible changes:
* in the lfs http_client, the number of lfs oids requested per batch is
loaded from lfs_client#BATCH_SIZE and defaulted to the previous value of
20
* in the lfs server/service, the max number of lfs oids allowed in a
batch api request is loaded from server#LFS_MAX_BATCH_SIZE and defaults
to 'nil' which equates to the previous behavior of 'infinite'
This fixes#32306
---------
Signed-off-by: Royce Remer <royceremer@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
before if it was nonglob each load would try to glob it and the check
that is not glob ... now we only do that once and no future loading will
trigger it
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
Migrated a handful Vue components to the `setup` syntax using
composition api as it has better Typescript support and is becoming the
new default in the Vue ecosystem.
- [x] ActionRunStatus.vue
- [x] ActivityHeatmap.vue
- [x] ContextPopup.vue
- [x] DiffFileList.vue
- [x] DiffFileTree.vue
- [x] DiffFileTreeItem.vue
- [x] PullRequestMergeForm.vue
- [x] RepoActivityTopAuthors.vue
- [x] RepoCodeFrequency.vue
- [x] RepoRecentCommits.vue
- [x] ScopedAccessTokenSelector.vue
Left some larger components untouched for now to not go to crazy in this
single PR:
- [ ] DiffCommitSelector.vue
- [ ] RepoActionView.vue
- [ ] RepoContributors.vue
- [ ] DashboardRepoList.vue
- [ ] RepoBranchTagSelector.vue
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.
Fixes#17131
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
These settings can allow users to only display the repositories explore page.
Thanks to yp05327 and wxiaoguang !
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
close#25833
Currently, the information for "requested_reviewers" is only included in
the webhook event for reviews. I would like to suggest adding this
information to the webhook event for "PullRequest comment" as well, as
they both pertain to the "PullRequest" event.
Also, The reviewer information for the Pull Request is not displayed
when it is approved or rejected.
Lunny Xiao