If the request isn't complete, this endpoint will now submit the request and
wait for completion using the new API. This may still be susceptible to
timeouts for larger repos, but other endpoints now exist that the web
interface will use to negotiate its way through larger archive processes.
This API will *not* allow consumers to subscribe to specific requests being
completed, just *any* request being completed. The caller is responsible for
determining if their request is satisfied and waiting again if needed.
Increase all timeouts to 10 seconds; these aren't hard-coded sleeps, so
there's no guarantee we'll actually take that long. If we need longer to
not have a false-positive, then so be it.
While here, various assert.{Not,}Equal arguments are flipped around so that
the wording in error output reflects reality, where the expected argument is
second and actual third.
We don't need to risk failure and use time.ParseDuration to get 2 *
time.Second.
else if isn't really necessary if the conditions are simple enough and lead
to the same result.
When archival was made async, the GET endpoint was only useful if a previous
POST had initiated the download. This commit restores the previous behavior,
to an extent; we'll now submit the archive request there and return a
"202 Accepted" to indicate that it's processing if we didn't manage to
complete the request within ~2 seconds of submission.
This lets a client directly GET the archive, and gives them some indication
that they may attempt to GET it again at a later time.
Things got shuffled around such that we carefully build up and release
requests from the queue, so we can validate the state of the queue at each
step. Fix some assertions that no longer hold true as fallout.
Once we've signaled a cond var, it may take some small amount of time for
the goroutines released to hit the spot we're wanting them to be at. Give
them an appropriate amount of time.
Locking/unlocking the queueMutex is allowed, but not required, for
Cond.Signal() and Cond.Broadcast(). The magic at play here is just a little
too much for golangci-lint, as we take the address of queueMutex and this is
mostly used in archiver.go; the variable still gets flagged as unused.
This introduces two sync.Cond pointers to the archiver package. If they're
non-nil when we go to process a request, we'll wait until signalled (at all)
to proceed. The tests will then create the sync.Cond so that it can signal
at-will and sanity-check the state of the queue at different phases.
The author believes that nil-checking these two sync.Cond pointers on every
archive processing will introduce minimal overhead with no impact on
maintainability.
Some, or perhaps even most, archives will not take all that long to archive.
The archive process starts as soon as the download button is initially
clicked, so in theory they could be done quite quickly. Drop the initial
delay down to three-quarters of a second to make it more responsive in the
common case of the archive being quickly created.
The prime benefit being sought here is for large archives to not
clog up the rendering process and cause unsightly proxy timeouts.
As a secondary benefit, archive-in-progress is moved out of the
way into a /tmp file so that new archival requests for the same
commit will not get fulfilled based on an archive that isn't yet
finished.
This asynchronous system is fairly primitive; request comes in, we'll
spawn off a new goroutine to handle it, then we'll mark it as done.
Status requests will see if the file exists in the final location,
and report the archival as done when it exists.
Fixes#11265
* routers: make /compare route available to unauthenticated users
Remove some bits of the compare interface if the user isn't signed in.
Notably, they don't need to see the "New Pull Request" button box nor the
hidden form that would fail to submit due to the POST request continuing to
require proper privileges.
Follow-up commits will improve the UI a bit around this, removing some
"Pull Request" verbiage in favor of "Compare."
* ui: home: show "compare" button for unauthenticated users
This change requires pulling in the BaseRepo unconditionally and
recording if the pull request is in-fact not allowed
(.PullRequestCtx.Allowed). If the user isn't allowed to create a pull
request, either because this isn't a fork or same-fork branch PRs aren't
allowed, then we'll name the button "Compare" instead of "Pull Request."
* ui: branch list: use the new Compare language when available
When viewing the branch listing as an unauthenticated user, you'll get
"Pull Request" buttons. use the new "Compare" verbiage instead, which
matches GitHub behavior when you can't issue a pull request from the
branches.
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
In the /install form, the value for SSH Server Domain is taken form the DOMAIN variable
and overwrites SSH_DOMAIN environment variable set the first time if nothing done
Co-authored-by: Adrian POIGET <adrian.poiget@viveris.fr>
* Add test
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Restore checkbox rendering and prevent poor sanitization of spans
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Also fix preview context
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Also fix preview context
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Previously, this required authentication, but there's not actually
any privileged information on this page. Move the endpoint out of
the group that requires sign-in. It still requires the ability to
read issues and pull requests, so private repositories (for instance)
will not be exposed.
Fixes#10312Fixes#11233
This is a boolean flag; simply checking if it's set isn't enough, we must check the value as well.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* Make sure that sendmail processes register with the process manager
* Provide a timeout for these (initially of 5 minutes)
* Add configurable value and tie in to documentation
* Tie in to the admin config page.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Now that emojify.js has been removed, get rid of all instances of has-emoji class that was only used for that. Support for rendering shortcodes should remain in all of these places so it should still work the same.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Not all dumps need to include the logs, in a similar vain to not all dumps
needing to include repositories; these may be subject to different backup
mechanisms/constraints. Add a simple option to let them be excluded from the
dump to simplify workflows that need to exclude them or not collect in the
first place.
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* Fix creation of Org repos
Fix go-gitea#9269
* Change variable name to appease linter
* Update PR with suggestions
Add a note for user.CanCreateRepo() about failure assumptions
Change repo.create help message
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
The SKS Keyserver network has been under attack with poisoned
certificates since at least 2019. Downloading a poisoned certificate has
the awful side-effect of completely breaking your keyring and most
software has now moved off the network and uses the keys.openpgp.org
which has a different protocol instead - in fact one whereby emails are
verified.
For more details regarding the attack see: https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f
See: https://keys.openpgp.org/about and https://keys.openpgp.org/about/faq
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Allow emoji short code in labels
As title, turn :alias: type short code into emojis when rendering labels to match previous behavior
* Update models/issue_label.go
Co-Authored-By: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
* render text in templates not code
* remove has-emoji class
🧙♀️
* fix new issue form
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Patch fomantic-ui to workaround build issue
Better workaround than https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/10653
for https://github.com/fomantic/Fomantic-UI/issues/1356. It does not
seem like we're getting a new Fomantic-UI release anytime soon, so
this patches it after node_modules installation.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/11243
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/10679
* copy instead of patch
* update package-lock.json
* Update Makefile
Co-Authored-By: Sorien <Sorien@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update web_src/fomantic/css.js
Co-Authored-By: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Sorien <Sorien@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Don't allow registration via the web form, when AllowOnlyExternalRegistration is True
* Show Disabled Registration message if DisableRegistration or AllowOnlyExternalRegistration options are true
In #9888, it was reported that my earlier pull request #9075 didn't quite function as expected. I was quite hopeful the `ValuesWithShadow()` worked as expected (and, I thought my testing showed it did) but I guess not. @zeripath proposed an alternative syntax which I like:
```ini
[markup.sanitizer.1]
ELEMENT=a
ALLOW_ATTR=target
REGEXP=something
[markup.sanitizer.2]
ELEMENT=a
ALLOW_ATTR=target
REGEXP=something
```
This was quite easy to adopt into the existing code. I've done so in a semi-backwards-compatible manner:
- The value from `.Value()` is used for each element.
- We parse `[markup.sanitizer]` and all `[markup.sanitizer.*]` sections and add them as rules.
This means that existing configs will load one rule (not all rules). It also means people can use string identifiers (`[markup.sanitiser.KaTeX]`) if they prefer, instead of numbered ones.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Support unicode emojis and remove emojify.js
This PR replaces all use of emojify.js and adds unicode emoji support to various areas of gitea.
This works in a few ways:
First it adds emoji parsing support into gitea itself. This allows us to
* Render emojis from valid alias (😄)
* Detect unicode emojis and let us put them in their own class with proper aria-labels and styling
* Easily allow for custom "emoji"
* Support all emoji rendering and features without javascript
* Uses plain unicode and lets the system render in appropriate emoji font
* Doesn't leave us relying on external sources for updates/fixes/features
That same list of emoji is also used to create a json file which replaces the part of emojify.js that populates the emoji search tribute. This file is about 35KB with GZIP turned on and I've set it to load after the page renders to not hinder page load time (and this removes loading emojify.js also)
For custom "emoji" it uses a pretty simple scheme of just looking for /emojis/img/name.png where name is something a user has put in the "allowed reactions" setting we already have. The gitea reaction that was previously hard coded into a forked copy of emojify.js is included and works as a custom reaction under this method.
The emoji data sourced here is from https://github.com/github/gemoji which is the gem library Github uses for their emoji rendering (and a data source for other sites). So we should be able to easily render any emoji and :alias: that Github can, removing any errors from migrated content. They also update it as well, so we can sync when there are new unicode emoji lists released.
I've included a slimmed down and slightly modified forked copy of https://github.com/knq/emoji to make up our own emoji module. The code is pretty straight forward and again allows us to have a lot of flexibility in what happens.
I had seen a few comments about performance in some of the other threads if we render this ourselves, but there doesn't seem to be any issue here. In a test it can parse, convert, and render 1,000 emojis inside of a large markdown table in about 100ms on my laptop (which is many more emojis than will ever be in any normal issue). This also prevents any flickering and other weirdness from using javascript to render some things while using go for others.
Not included here are image fall back URLS. I don't really think they are necessary for anything new being written in 2020. However, managing the emoji ourselves would allow us to add these as a feature later on if it seems necessary.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/9182
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/8974
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/8953
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/6628
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/5130
* add new shared function emojiHTML
* don't increase emoji size in issue title
* Update templates/repo/issue/view_content/add_reaction.tmpl
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Support for emoji rendering in various templates
* Render code and review comments as they should be
* Better way to handle mail subjects
* insert unicode from tribute selection
* Add template helper for plain text when needed
* Use existing replace function I forgot about
* Don't include emoji greater than Unicode Version 12
Only include emoji and aliases in JSON
* Update build/generate-emoji.go
* Tweak regex slightly to really match everything including random invisible characters. Run tests for every emoji we have
* final updates
* code review
* code review
* hard code gitea custom emoji to match previous behavior
* Update .eslintrc
Co-Authored-By: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
* disable preempt
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Kyle Evans