Backport #30535 by wxiaoguang
Regression of #29920
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30569
Also this is a rewriting to eliminate the remaining jQuery usages from
code.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #30520 by @KN4CK3R
Fixes#28255
The new query uses the id field to sort by "newer". This most not be
correct (usually it is) but it's faster (see #28255).
If someone has a better idea, please propose changes.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #30594 by wxiaoguang
Thanks to @Zottelchen for looking into problem and proposing the fix.
Ref: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3017 ,
https://peps.python.org/pep-0503/
This PR's change is from Zottelchen's work.
And I by the way rename the `$p` to `$pd` because `p` is used as
"package" in code, while `pd` is used as "package description".
----
Co-authored-by: Zottelchen
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #30581 by @yp05327
Follow https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30357
When user push to default branch, the schedule trigger user will be the
user.
When disable then enable action units in settings, the schedule trigger
user will be action user.
When repo is a mirror, the schedule trigger user will be action user. (
before it will return error, fixed by #30357)
As scheduled job is a cron, the trigger user should be action user from
Gitea, not a real user.
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Backport #30584 by @wolfogre
Related to #30375.
It doesn't make sense to import `modules/web/middleware` and
`modules/setting` in `modules/web/session` since the last one is more
low-level.
And it looks like a workaround to call `DeleteLegacySiteCookie` in
`RegenerateSession`, so maybe we could reverse the importing by
registering hook functions.
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Backport #30577 by @silverwind
Enable npm dependency cache in
[setup-node](https://github.com/actions/setup-node). This should work
reliably and across branches as well.
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #30555 by xor-gate
Config section `[task]` has been deprecated in favor of `[queue.task]`
Co-authored-by: Jerry Jacobs <xor-gate@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #30546 by @silverwind
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30384
On repo settings page, there id `repo_name` was used 5 times on the same
page, some in modal and such. I think we are better off just
auto-generating these IDs in the future so that labels link up with
their form element.
Ideally this id generation would be done in backend in a subtemplate,
but seeing that we already have similar JS patches for checkboxes, I
took the easy path for now.
I also checked that these `#repo_name` were not in use in JS and the
only case where this id appears in JS is on the migration page where
it's still there.
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #30291 by @edwardzhanged
Add some logic in `convert.ToBranchProtection` to return only the names
associated with readAccess instead of returning all names. This will
ensure consistency in behavior between the frontend and backend.
Fixes: #27694
Co-authored-by: Edward Zhang <45360012+edwardzhanged@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: wenzhuo.zhang <wenzhuo.zhang@geely.com>
Backport #30529 by @silverwind
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30512
I think this does mean those tools would run on a potential `vendor`
directory, but I'm not sure we really support vendoring of dependencies
anymore.
`release` has a `vendor` prerequisite so likely the source tarballs
contain vendor files?
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #30375 by @jtran
Cookies may exist on "/subpath" and "/subpath/" for some legacy reasons
(eg: changed CookiePath behavior in code). The legacy cookie should be
removed correctly.
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jonnytran@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Backport #30453 by @silverwind
Enable `no-sizzle` lint rule, there was only one use in
`initCompReactionSelector` which I have rewritten as follows:
- Remove all jQuery except the necessary fomantic dropdown init
- Remove the recursion, instead bind event listeners to common parent
container nodes
Did various tests, works with our without attachments, in diff view and
in diff comments inside comment list.
Additionally the style of reactions now matches between code comments
and issue comments:
<img width="275" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-13 at 14 58 10"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/9d08f188-8661-4dd9-bff4-cad6d6d09cab">
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #30456 by wxiaoguang
1. Check whether the label is for an issue or a pull request.
2. Don't use space to layout
3. Make sure the test strings have trailing spaces explicitly, to avoid
some IDE removing the trailing spaces automatically.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #30392 by @jam7
This patch improves the migration from gitbucket to gitea.
The gitbucket uses it's own internal perPage value (= 25) for paging and
ignore per_page arguments in the requested URL. This cause gitea to
migrate only 25 issues and 25 PRs from gitbucket repository. This may
not happens on old gitbucket. But recent gitbucket 4.40 or 4.38.4 has
this problem.
This patch change to use this internally hardcoded perPage of gitbucket
as gitea's maxPerPage numer when migrating from gitbucket. There are
several perPage values in gitbucket like 25 for Isseus/PRs and 10 for
Releases. Some of those API doesn't support paging yet. It sounds
difficult to implement, but using the minimum number among them worked
out very well. So, I use 10 in this patch.
Brief descriptions of problems and this patch are also available in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30316.
In addition, I'm not sure what kind of test cases are possible to write
here. It's a test for migration, so it requires testing gitbucket server
and gitea server, I guess. Please let me know if it is possible to write
such test cases here. Thanks!
Co-authored-by: Kazushi (Jam) Marukawa <jam@pobox.com>
Backport #30419 by wxiaoguang
Follow Split `index.js` to separate files (#17315)
It's time to move some code away from the messy "legacy" file.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #30357 by @yp05327
When repo is a mirror, and commit author is an external user, then
`GetUserByEmail` will return error.
reproduce/test:
- mirror Gitea to your instance
- disable action and enable it again, this will trigger
`DetectAndHandleSchedules`
ps: also follow #24706, it only fixed normal runs, not scheduled runs.
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Backport #30382 by @wolfogre
Fix regression of #30331.
```txt
time="2024-04-10T02:23:49Z" level=error msg="failed to fetch task" func="[fetchTask]" file="[poller.go:91]" error="unknown: rpc error: code = Internal desc = pick task: CreateTaskForRunner: Error 1052 (23000): Column 'id' in field list is ambiguous"
```
I have tested it in my local env, and it should work now.
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Backport #30104 by @lunny
Agit returned result should be from `ProcReceive` hook but not
`PostReceive` hook. Then for all non-agit pull requests, it will not
check the pull requests for every pushing `refs/pull/%d/head`.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #30331 by @yp05327
Fix#30243
We only checking unit disabled when detecting workflows, but not in
runner `FetchTask`.
So if a workflow was detected when action unit is enabled, but disabled
later, `FetchTask` will still return these detected actions.
Global setting: repo.ENABLED and repository.`DISABLED_REPO_UNITS` will
not effect this.
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Giteabot